دورية أكاديمية
Safe sex negotiation and HIV risk reduction among women: A cross-sectional analysis of Burkina Faso 2021 Demographic and Health Survey.
العنوان: | Safe sex negotiation and HIV risk reduction among women: A cross-sectional analysis of Burkina Faso 2021 Demographic and Health Survey. |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Saaka SA; Department of Geography and Environment, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada., Pienaah CKA; Department of Geography and Environment, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada., Stampp Z; Department of Geography and Environment, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada., Antabe R; Department of Health and Society, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada. |
المصدر: | PLOS global public health [PLOS Glob Public Health] 2024 Apr 24; Vol. 4 (4), pp. e0003134. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 24 (Print Publication: 2024). |
نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
اللغة: | English |
بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9918283779606676 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2767-3375 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 27673375 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLOS Glob Public Health Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE |
أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: San Francisco, California : Public Library of Science, [2021]- |
مستخلص: | Women are biologically more susceptible to the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and other sexually transmitted Infections (STIs) because receptive sex is riskier than insertive. Despite condom use being the staple preventive method for HIV infection (over 80% efficacy), in Sub-Saharan African countries like Burkina Faso, a high burden of HIV and the unmet need for condom use coexist. Moreover, even though women in SSA are disproportionately HIV positive, they are reportedly less capable of negotiating condom use for HIV risk reduction. Thus, using the Health Believe Model (HBM), this study explored the factors that influence condom use among women within the context of HIV prevention, with a key interest in condom use negotiation. Using the women's dataset of the 2021 Burkina Faso Demographic and Health Survey and applying logistic regression models, this study examined the factors associated with condom use for HIV risk reduction. Women who had confidence to negotiate condom use with their partners (OR = 1.57, P<0.001, 95%CI: 1.29, 1.91), those with secondary education (OR = 1.38, P<0.05, 95%CI: 1.07 1.77), from richest households (OR = 1.64, P<0.05, 95%CI: 1.08, 2.47), the employed (OR = 1.23, P<0.05, 95%CI: 1.02, 1.49), women with knowledge of sexually transmitted infections (OR = 1.58, P<0.001, 95%CI: 1.26, 1.97), those who have ever been tested for HIV (OR = 1.85, P<0.001, 95%CI: 1.52 2.24), as well as those who knew that a healthy-looking person can have HIV (OR = 2.64, P<0.001, 95%CI: 2.15, 3.24) were all significantly more likely to practice condom use for HIV risk reduction. Also, religion and geographical location of participants significantly predicted condom use for HIV risk reduction in the study context. The ability to negotiate condom use, knowledge of HIV and STIs, the socioeconomic status of women, as well as their geographical location, influence their practice of safer sex for HIV risk reduction in Burkina Faso. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. (Copyright: © 2024 Saaka et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.) |
References: | Lancet. 2011 Jul 16;378(9787):269-78. (PMID: 21763938) Sex Transm Infect. 2007 Dec;83(7):510-6. (PMID: 17932124) Soc Sci Med. 1997 May;44(9):1303-12. (PMID: 9141163) Trop Med Int Health. 2006 Dec;11(12):1889-97. (PMID: 17176354) Int J Equity Health. 2018 May 11;17(1):58. (PMID: 29751836) Cult Health Sex. 2013;15(3):269-82. (PMID: 23043556) N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 2;367(5):459-61. (PMID: 22784041) BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 15;21(1):148. (PMID: 33588836) J Pak Med Assoc. 2013 Apr;63(4 Suppl 3):S67-72. (PMID: 24386733) PLoS One. 2024 Jan 19;19(1):e0296934. (PMID: 38241404) SSM Popul Health. 2021 Mar 17;14:100773. (PMID: 33855160) Afr J Reprod Health. 2007 Dec;11(3):28-43. (PMID: 18458739) Int J Health Plann Manage. 2020 Jul;35(4):939-959. (PMID: 32310321) Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Aug;16(4):489-99. (PMID: 26488070) AIDS Educ Prev. 2002 Feb;14(1):62-72. (PMID: 11900111) Stud Fam Plann. 2004 Mar;35(1):39-47. (PMID: 15067787) J Adolesc Health. 2006 Jan;38(1):18-25. (PMID: 16387244) AIDS Behav. 2018 Feb;22(2):671-680. (PMID: 29090395) AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2012 Nov;26(11):694-9. (PMID: 23066699) BMC Public Health. 2012 Dec 20;12:1097. (PMID: 23256530) J Adolesc Health. 2006 May;38(5):550-5. (PMID: 16635766) Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2013 Mar;10(1):59-64. (PMID: 23224425) J Adolesc Health. 2021 Jan;68(1):13-27. (PMID: 33059958) Health Educ Q. 1984 Spring;11(1):1-47. (PMID: 6392204) PeerJ. 2023 May 30;11:e15391. (PMID: 37273544) BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 3;21(1):1498. (PMID: 34344339) Cult Health Sex. 2016;18(4):453-69. (PMID: 26503879) Stud Fam Plann. 2023 Mar;54(1):201-230. (PMID: 36729070) Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008 Jun;13(2):114-22. (PMID: 18465472) |
تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20240424 Latest Revision: 20240427 |
رمز التحديث: | 20240427 |
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: | PMC11042694 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003134 |
PMID: | 38656996 |
قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
كن أول من يترك تعليقا!