دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Bleaching efficacy of in-office dental bleaching with different application protocols: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Bleaching efficacy of in-office dental bleaching with different application protocols: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.
المؤلفون: Favoreto MW; Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Rua Carlos Cavalcanti, Bloco M - Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Parana, 4748, Brazil.; School of Dentistry, Tuiuti University, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil., Camargo CM; Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Rua Carlos Cavalcanti, Bloco M - Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Parana, 4748, Brazil., Forville H; Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Rua Carlos Cavalcanti, Bloco M - Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Parana, 4748, Brazil., Carneiro TS; Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Rua Carlos Cavalcanti, Bloco M - Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Parana, 4748, Brazil.; Area of Stomatology, IDIBO research group, Health Sciences Faculty, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain., Ñaupari-Villasante R; Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Rua Carlos Cavalcanti, Bloco M - Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Parana, 4748, Brazil., Wendlinger M; Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Rua Carlos Cavalcanti, Bloco M - Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Parana, 4748, Brazil., Reis A; Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Rua Carlos Cavalcanti, Bloco M - Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Parana, 4748, Brazil., Loguercio AD; Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Rua Carlos Cavalcanti, Bloco M - Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Parana, 4748, Brazil. aloguercio@hotmail.com.
المصدر: Clinical oral investigations [Clin Oral Investig] 2024 May 03; Vol. 28 (5), pp. 295. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 03.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Springer-Verlag Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 9707115 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1436-3771 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14326981 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Clin Oral Investig Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Berlin : Springer-Verlag
Original Publication: Berlin : Springer, c1997-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Tooth Bleaching*/methods , Hydrogen Peroxide*/administration & dosage , Tooth Bleaching Agents* , Dentin Sensitivity*/chemically induced , Dentin Sensitivity*/prevention & control, Humans ; Female ; Male ; Adult ; Single-Blind Method ; Spectrophotometry ; Treatment Outcome ; Middle Aged ; Esthetics, Dental ; Adolescent
مستخلص: Objective: This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the equivalence in the color change, adverse effects, self-perception (AS) and the impact on oral condition (IO) of participants submitted to different application protocols of in-office dental bleaching.
Materials and Methods: 165 participants were bleached with a 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (Total Blanc Office One-Step, DFL), according to the following protocols: (1) 2 applications of 20-min each (2 × 20 min); (2) 1 × 40-min and; (3) 1 × 30-min. The color change was evaluated with the Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer, Vita Classical and Vita Bleachedguide scales. The intensity and risk of tooth sensitivity (TS) and gingival irritation (GI) were recorded using a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS). AS and IO was assessed before and after the bleaching procedure using the Orofacial Aesthetic Scale and Oral Health Impact Profile-14, respectively.
Results: Equivalent color change were observed (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between groups. The group 2 × 20 min presented the highest risk of TS (76%, 95% CI 63 to 85), compared to the 1 × 30 min (p < 0.04). The intensity of TS and GI and the risk of GI was similar between groups (p > 0.31). Irrespectively of the group (p = 0.32), significant improvements were observed for all items of AS and IO after bleaching (p < 0.02).
Conclusions: The 1 × 30 min protocol produced equivalent color change to the other bleaching protocols with reduced risk of TS and shorter application time.
Clinical Relevance: A more simplified application regimen of a single application of 30 min yields effective bleaching and patient satisfaction while minimizing undesirable side effects and improving patient satisfaction.
(© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
References: Abbasi MS, Lal A, Das G, Salman F, Akram A, Ahmed AR, Maqsood A, Ahmed N (2022) Impact of social media on aesthetic dentistry: General practitioners’ perspectives. Healthcare 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10102055.
Bonafé E, Rezende M, Machado MM, Lima SNL, Fernandez E, Baldani MMP, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bandeca MC (2021) Personality traits, psychosocial effects and quality of life of patients submitted to dental bleaching. BMC Oral Health 21:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01370-6. (PMID: 10.1186/s12903-020-01370-6334073427789155)
Bersezio C, Martín J, Mayer C, Rivera O, Estay J, Vernal R, Haidar ZS, Angel P, Oliveira OB Jr., Fernández E (2018) Quality of life and stability of tooth color change at three months after dental bleaching. Qual Life Res 27:3199–3207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1972-7. (PMID: 10.1007/s11136-018-1972-730132252)
Goettems ML, Fernandez MDS, Donassollo TA, Henn Donassollo S, Demarco FF (2021) Impact of tooth bleaching on oral health-related quality of life in adults: a triple-blind randomised clinical trial. J Dent 105:103564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103564. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.10356433359042)
Kwon SR, Wertz PW (2015) Review of the Mechanism of Tooth Whitening. Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry 27:240 – 57. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12152.
Reis A, Mendonça da Silva L, Martins L, Loguercio A (2018) In-office tooth whitening. Clin Dentistry Reviewed 2:10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41894-018-0021-9. (PMID: 10.1007/s41894-018-0021-9)
da Silva KL, Favoreto MW, Centenaro GG, Bernardi LG, Borges CPF, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2023) Can all highly concentrated in-office bleaching gels be used as a single-application? Clin Oral Invest 27:3663–3671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04980-w. (PMID: 10.1007/s00784-023-04980-w)
Favoreto MW, Cordeiro DCF, Centenaro GG, Bosco LD, Arana-Gordillo LA, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2024) Evaluating color change and hydrogen peroxide penetration in human and bovine teeth through in-office bleaching procedures. J Esthetic Restor Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13207. (PMID: 10.1111/jerd.13207)
Pignoly C, Camps L, Susini G, About I, Camps J (2012) Influence of in-office whitening gel pH on hydrogen peroxide diffusion through enamel and color changes in bovine teeth. Am J Dent 25:91–96. (PMID: 22779282)
Balladares L, Alegría-Acevedo LF, Montenegro-Arana A, Arana-Gordillo LA, Pulido C, Salazar-Gracez MT, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2019) Effects of pH and application technique of In-office bleaching gels on Hydrogen Peroxide Penetration into the Pulp Chamber. Oper Dent 44:659–667. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-148-l. (PMID: 10.2341/18-148-l31009314)
Mena-Serrano AP, Parreiras SO, do Nascimento EM, Borges CP, Berger SB, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2015) Effects of the concentration and composition of in-office bleaching gels on hydrogen peroxide penetration into the pulp chamber. Oper Dent 40:E76–82. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-352-l. (PMID: 10.2341/13-352-l25535786)
Kossatz S, Martins G, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2012) Tooth sensitivity and bleaching effectiveness associated with use of a calcium-containing in-office bleaching gel. J Am Dent Assoc 143:e81–e87. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0075. (PMID: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.007523204096)
Loguercio AD, Servat F, Stanislawczuk R, Mena-Serrano A, Rezende M, Prieto MV, Cereño V, Rojas MF, Ortega K, Fernandez E, Reis A (2017) Effect of acidity of in-office bleaching gels on tooth sensitivity and whitening: a two-center double-blind randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest 21:2811–2818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2083-5. (PMID: 10.1007/s00784-017-2083-5)
Martins I, Onofre S, Franco N, Martins LM, Montenegro A, Arana-Gordillo LA, Reis A, Loguercio AD, da Silva LM (2018) Effectiveness of In-office hydrogen peroxide with two different protocols: a two-center Randomized Clinical Trial. Oper Dent 43:353–361. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-128-c. (PMID: 10.2341/17-128-c29949479)
Reis A, Tay LY, Herrera DR, Kossatz S, Loguercio AD (2011) Clinical effects of prolonged application time of an in-office bleaching gel. Oper Dent 36:590–596. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-173-c. (PMID: 10.2341/10-173-c21913864)
Meireles SS, Santos ME, Lustosa ÍMC, Leite ELL (2021) Effects of a reduced in-office bleaching protocol with 37.5% hydrogen peroxide on effectiveness and tooth sensitivity: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Esthetic Restor Dentistry 33:824–831. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12744. (PMID: 10.1111/jerd.12744)
Dourado Pinto AV, Carlos NR, Amaral F, França FMG, Turssi CP, Basting RT (2019) At-home, in-office and combined dental bleaching techniques using hydrogen peroxide: randomized clinical trial evaluation of effectiveness, clinical parameters and enamel mineral content. Am J Dent 32:124–132. (PMID: 31295393)
Kury M, Lins RBE, Resende BA, Picolo MZD, André CB, Cavalli V (2022) The influence of the renewal or the single application of the peroxide gel on the efficacy and tooth sensitivity outcomes of in-office bleaching-A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Esthetic Restor Dentistry 34:490–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12827. (PMID: 10.1111/jerd.12827)
Maran BM, Matos TP, de Castro ADS, Vochikovski L, Amadori AL, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Berger SB (2020) In-office bleaching with low/medium vs. high concentrate hydrogen peroxide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 103:103499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103499. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.10349933068711)
Gurgan S, Cakir FY, Yazici E (2010) Different light-activated in-office bleaching systems: a clinical evaluation. Lasers Med Sci 25:817–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-009-0688-x. (PMID: 10.1007/s10103-009-0688-x19588075)
Klaric E, Par M, Profeta I, Kopjar N, Rozgaj R, Kasuba V, Zeljezic D, Tarle Z (2013) Genotoxic effect of two bleaching agents on oral mucosa. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 10:209–215. (PMID: 24136973)
Santana TR, Silva PFD, Santana MLC, de Mattos C, Favoreto MW, de Souza Carneiro T, Reis A, Loguércio AD, Cavalcante LMA, Schneider LFJ, Faria e Silva AL (2024) Effect of gingival barrier brands on operator perception, cervical adaptation, and patient comfort during in-office tooth bleaching: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 24:139. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-03900-y. (PMID: 10.1186/s12903-024-03900-y3828191110822166)
Price RB, Sedarous M, Hiltz GS (2000) The pH of tooth-whitening products. J Can Dent Assoc 66:421–426. (PMID: 11040525)
Freire A, Archegas LR, de Souza EM, Vieira S (2009) Effect of storage temperature on pH of in-office and at-home dental bleaching agents. Acta Odontol Latinoam 22:27–31. (PMID: 19601493)
Cavalli V, Silva BGD, Berger SB, Marson FC, Tabchoury CPM, Giannini M (2019) Decomposition rate, pH, and Enamel Color Alteration of At-Home and In-Office Bleaching agents. Braz Dent J 30:385–396. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201902484. (PMID: 10.1590/0103-644020190248431340230)
Torres CR, Crastechini E, Feitosa FA, Pucci CR, Borges AB (2014) Influence of pH on the effectiveness of hydrogen peroxide whitening. Oper Dent 39:E261–E268. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-214-l. (PMID: 10.2341/13-214-l25136903)
Acuña ED, Parreiras SO, Favoreto MW, Cruz GP, Gomes A, Borges CPF, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2022) In-office bleaching with a commercial 40% hydrogen peroxide gel modified to have different pHs: Color change, surface morphology, and penetration of hydrogen peroxide into the pulp chamber. J Esthetic Restor Dentistry 34:322–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12453. (PMID: 10.1111/jerd.12453)
Sa Y, Sun L, Wang Z, Ma X, Liang S, Xing W, Jiang T, Wang Y (2013) Effects of two in-office bleaching agents with different pH on the structure of human enamel: an in situ and in vitro study. Oper Dent 38:100–110. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-173-l. (PMID: 10.2341/11-173-l22917440)
Soares AF, Bombonatti JF, Alencar MS, Consolmagno EC, Honório HM, Mondelli RF (2016) Influence of pH, bleaching agents, and acid etching on surface wear of bovine enamel. J Appl Oral Sci 24:24–30. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720150281. (PMID: 10.1590/1678-775720150281270082544775006)
Trentino AC, Soares AF, Duarte MA, Ishikiriama SK, Mondelli RF (2015) Evaluation of pH levels and surface roughness after bleaching and abrasion tests of eight Commercial products. Photomed Laser Surg 33:372–377. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2014.3869. (PMID: 10.1089/pho.2014.386926154725)
Soares DG, Basso FG, Hebling J, de Souza Costa CA (2014) Concentrations of and application protocols for hydrogen peroxide bleaching gels: effects on pulp cell viability and whitening efficacy. J Dent 42:185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.021. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.02124239924)
Kose C, Calixto AL, Bauer JR, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2016) Comparison of the effects of In-office Bleaching Times on whitening and tooth sensitivity: a single Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial. Oper Dent 41:138–145. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-085-c. (PMID: 10.2341/15-085-c26509229)
Pandis N, Chung B, Scherer RW, Elbourne D, Altman DG (2019) CONSORT 2010 statement: extension checklist for reporting within person randomised trials. Br J Dermatol 180:534–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17239. (PMID: 10.1111/bjd.1723930609010)
Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ, Altman DG (2012) Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA 308:2594–2604. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.87802. (PMID: 10.1001/jama.2012.8780223268518)
Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Bona AD, Igiel C, Linninger M, Sakai M, Takahashi H, Tashkandi E, Perez Mdel M (2015) Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthetic Restor Dentistry 27(Suppl 1):S1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12149. (PMID: 10.1111/jerd.12149)
Hardan L, Bourgi R, Cuevas-Suárez CE, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Monjarás-Ávila AJ, Zarow M, Jakubowicz N, Jorquera G, Ashi T, Mancino D, Kharouf N, Haikel Y (2022) Novel trends in Dental Color Match using different shade selection methods: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Materials 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020468.
Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Alessandretti R, Pérez MM, Della Bona A (2016) Visual and instrumental shade matching using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas. Dent Mater 32:82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.10.015. (PMID: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.10.01526631341)
ISO 28642 2011 I Dentistry - Guidance on Colour Measurement.
CIE - Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. Recommendations on uniform color spaces, color difference equations, psychometric color terms (1978) 2:5–6.
Luo MR, Cui G, Rigg B (2001) The development of the CIE 2000 colour-difference formula: CIEDE2000. Color Res Appl 26:340–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.1049. (PMID: 10.1002/col.1049)
Pérez Mdel M, Ghinea R, Rivas MJ, Yebra A, Ionescu AM, Paravina RD, Herrera LJ (2016) Development of a customized whiteness index for dentistry based on CIELAB color space. Dent Mater 32:461–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.12.008. (PMID: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.12.00826778404)
Pérez MM, Herrera LJ, Carrillo F, Pecho OE, Dudea D, Gasparik C, Ghinea R, Bona AD (2019) Whiteness difference thresholds in dentistry. Dent Mater 35:292–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.022. (PMID: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.02230527588)
Campos LA, Marôco J, John MT, Santos-Pinto A, Campos J (2020) Development and psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-Pt. PeerJ 8:e8814. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8814. (PMID: 10.7717/peerj.8814322112457083155)
John MT (2018) Health outcomes reported by Dental patients. J Evid Based Dent Pract 18:332–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2018.09.001. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2018.09.00130514446)
Oliveira BH, Nadanovsky P (2005) Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the oral Health Impact Profile-short form. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 33:307–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2005.00225.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2005.00225.x)
Marson FC, Gonçalves RS, Silva CO, Cintra LT, Pascotto RC, Santos PH, Briso AL (2015) Penetration of hydrogen peroxide and degradation rate of different bleaching products. Oper Dent 40:72–79. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-270-L. (PMID: 10.2341/13-270-L24828134)
Santana TR, Silva PFD, Santana MLC, de Mattos CLLB, Favoreto MW, de Souza Carneiro T, Reis A, Loguércio AD, Cavalcante LMA, Schneider LFJ, Faria-E-Silva AL (2024) Effect of gingival barrier brands on operator perception, cervical adaptation, and patient comfort during in-office tooth bleaching: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 28;24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-03900-y.
معلومات مُعتمدة: 001 Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; 304817/2021-0 Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; 308286/2019-7 Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Application protocol; Color bleaching; In-office bleaching; Quality of life; Tooth sensitivity
المشرفين على المادة: BBX060AN9V (Hydrogen Peroxide)
0 (Tooth Bleaching Agents)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240503 Date Completed: 20240503 Latest Revision: 20240527
رمز التحديث: 20240527
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05697-0
PMID: 38700548
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1436-3771
DOI:10.1007/s00784-024-05697-0