دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Long-term intravenous devices: a narrative review of their placement.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Long-term intravenous devices: a narrative review of their placement.
المؤلفون: Roche S; Department of anesthesia and resuscitation, hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
المصدر: Current opinion in anaesthesiology [Curr Opin Anaesthesiol] 2024 Aug 01; Vol. 37 (4), pp. 400-405. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 13.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Review
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8813436 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1473-6500 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09527907 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Curr Opin Anaesthesiol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Philadelphia, PA : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Original Publication: Philadelphia, PA, USA : Gower Academic Journals, c1988-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Catheterization, Peripheral*/instrumentation , Catheterization, Peripheral*/adverse effects , Catheterization, Peripheral*/methods, Humans ; Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation ; Catheterization, Central Venous/methods ; Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects ; Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control ; Catheter-Related Infections/etiology ; Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects ; Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects
مستخلص: Purpose of Review: This review summarizes the latest findings and recommendations about the characteristics, indications and use of peripheral and central long-term venous access devices.The various complications inherent in these devices are becoming better known, and their contributing factors determined, which could make it possible to reduce their incidence.
Recent Findings: Some measures are integrated into recommendations for good practice, such as appropriate selection of devices, the preferential use of the thinnest catheters, and cyanoacrylate glue and dressings impregnated with chlorhexidine.
Summary: Improving understanding of the phenomena leading to infectious and thrombotic complications, as well as better knowing the differences between intravenous devices and their respective indications, should lead to improvement of in-hospital and out-of-hospital care.
(Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
References: Chopra V, Kuhn L, Coffey CE Jr, et al. Hospitalist experiences, practice, opinions, and knowledge regarding peripherally inserted central catheters: a Michigan survey. J Hosp Med 2013; 8:309–314.
Taxbro K, Hammarskjöld F, Thelin B, et al. Clinical impact of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted port catheters in patients with cancer: an open-label, randomised, two-centre trial. Br J Anaesth 2019; 122:734–741.
De Souza Fantin S, Scherer Dos Santos M, Ferro EB, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheters versus centrally inserted central catheters for in-hospital infusion therapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Value Health Reg Issues 2024; 41:123–130.
Maki J, Sumie M, Ide T, et al. A pressure-resistant peripherally inserted central catheter is as useful as a central venous catheter for rapid fluid infusion: an in vitro study. BMC Anesthesiol 2022; 22:205.
Mitbander UB, Geer MJ, Taxbro K, et al. Patterns of use and outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheters in hospitalized patients with solid tumors: a multicenter study. Cancer 2022; 128:3681–3690.
Perego M, Calloni M, Taino A, et al. Letter in response to a recent article by Zhang et al . Thromb Res 2024; 236:85–87.
Chopra V, Kaatz S, Conlon A, et al. The Michigan Risk Score to predict peripherally inserted central catheter-associated thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15:1951–1962.
Chopra V, O’Malley M, Horowitz J, et al. Improving peripherally inserted central catheter appropriateness and reducing device-related complications: a quasi experimental study in 52 Michigan hospitals. BMJ Qual Saf 2022; 31:23–30.
Chopra V, Anand S, Hickner A, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2013; 382:311–325.
Espitia O, Tissot A, Miossec A, et al. Upper extremity venous thrombosis in hospitalized patients: a prospective epidemiological study. Thromb Res 2024; 233:174–180.
Fallouh N, McGuirk HM, Flanders SA, Chopra V. Peripherally inserted central catheter-associated deep vein thrombosis: a narrative review. Am J Med 2015; 128:722–738.
Bahl A, Alsbrooks K, Gala S, Hoerauf K. Symptomatic deep vein thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central catheters of different diameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2023; 29:1–11.
Sharp R, Carr P, Childs J, et al. Catheter to vein ratio and risk of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-associated thrombosis according to diagnostic group: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e045895.
Giustivi D, Gidaro A, Baroni M, Paglia S. Tunneling technique of PICCs and midline catheters. J Vasc Access 2022; 23:610–614.
Ostroff MD, Moureau N, Pittiruti M. Rapid Assessment of Vascular Exit Site and Tunneling Options (RAVESTO): a new decision tool in the management of the complex vascular access patients. J Vasc Access 2023; 24:311–317.
Benvenuti S, Porteri E, Ceresoli R, et al. Pseudo-tunneling procedure: an easy technique for insertion of PICCs and Midline catheters in patients with small veins of the arm. J Vasc Access 2023; 11297298231191367[Online ahead of print].
Doyle SC, Bergin NM, Young R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for localising peripherally inserted central catheter tips in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Radiol 2022; 52:2421–2430.
Balsorano P, Virgili G, Villa G, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheter-related thrombosis rate in modern vascular access era when insertion technique matters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Access 2020; 21:45–54.
Puri A, Dai H, Giri M, et al. The incidence and risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters in hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:917572.
Hussain RN, Mandal AK, Li N, et al. Right heart thrombus in transit and peripherally inserted central catheters. Thromb J 2023; 21:68.
Elias A, Debourdeau P, Espitia O, et al. INNOVTE CAT Working Group. Central venous catheter associated upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in cancer patients: diagnosis and therapeutic management. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2024; 117:72–83.
Kakkos SK, Gohel M, Baekgaard N, et al. European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2021 Clinical practice guidelines on the management of venous thrombosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2021; 61:9–82.
Xu H, Hyun A, Mihala G, et al. The effectiveness of dressings and securement devices to prevent central venous-catheter associated complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2024; 149:104620.
O’Grady NP. Prevention of central-line associated bloodstream infections. N Eng J Med 2023; 389:1121–1131.
Trembath HE, Caruso DM, McLean SE, et al. Central line-associated bloodstream infection risk factors in a pediatric population. Am Surg 2024; 90:69–74.
Ullman AJ, Paterson RS, Schults JA, et al. Do antimicrobial and antithrombogenic peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) materials prevent catheter complications? An analysis of 42,562 hospitalized medical patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2022; 43:427–434.
Kumar Upadhyay A, Prakash B, Shekhar S, Kumar A, et al. Embolization of a fractured peripherally inserted central catheter to pulmonary arteries: a sporadic life-threatening phenomenon. Cureus 2023; 15:e43044.
Bae HS, Kim KY, Han YM. Comparison of complications between reverse-tapered and nontapered peripherally inserted central catheters. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0285445.
Bailleul A, Fulgencio JP, Vimont S, et al. Risk factors and prognostic significance of infection of totally implantable vascular access port in solid tumor patients: a prospective cohort study. Infect Dis Now 2023; 53:104766.
Narita A, Takehara Y, Maruchi Y, et al. Usefulness of peripherally inserted central catheter port system (PICC-PORT) implantation in the sitting position: a new technique for cases unsuitable for conventional implantation. Jpn J Radiol 2023; 41:108–113.
Pénichoux J, Rio J, Kammoun L, et al. Retrospective analysis of the safety of peripherally inserted catheters versus implanted ports catheters during first-line treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Eur J Haematol 2022; 109:41–49.
Lin L, Li W, Chen C, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheters versus implantable port catheters for cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1228092.
Pittiruti M, Van Boxtel T, Scoppettuolo G, et al. European recommendations on the proper indication and use of peripheral venous accessdevices (the ERPIUP consensus): a WoCoVA project. J Vasc Access 2023; 24:165–182.
Elli S, Pittiruti M, Pigozzo V, et al. Ultrasound-guided tip location of midline catheters. J Vasc Access 2020; 21:764–768.
Zhang H, Li X, Sun W, et al. Comparison of complications and indwelling time of midline catheter at different tip locations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Access 2023; 11297298231199776[Online ahead of print].
Fabiani A, Santoro M, Sanson G. The catheter-to-vein ratio at the tip level, not the catheter type, as a risk factor for a catheter failure. A retrospective comparative study of polyurethane midline and long peripheral catheters. Heart Lung 2023; 60:39–44.
Bahl A, Mielke N, Xing Y. Risk of midline catheter-related thrombosis due to catheter diameter: an observational cohort study. Thromb Res 2023; 228:172–180.
Padilla-Nula F, Bergua-Lorente A, Farrero-Mena J, et al. Effectiveness of cyanoacrylate glue in the fixation of midline catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters in hospitalized adult patients: randomised clinical trial (CIANO-ETI). SAGE Open Med 2023; 11:20503121231170743.
Piersigilli F, Iacona G, Yazami S, et al. Cyanoacrylate glue as part of a new bundle to decrease neonatal PICC-related complications. Eur J Pediatr 2023; 182:5607–5613.
Rickard CM, Larsen E, Walker RM, et al. Integrated versus non-integrated peripheral intravenous catheter in hospitalized adults (OPTIMUM): a randomized control trial. J Hosp Med 2023; 18:21–32.
Bahl A, Johnson S, Mielke N. Risk factors for midline catheter failure: a secondary analysis of an existing trial. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2022; 18:999–1007.
Bing S, Smotherman C, Rodriguez RG, et al. PICC versus midlines: comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters and midline catheters with respect to incidence of thromboembolic and infectious complications. Am J Surg 2022; 223:983–987.
Urtecho M, Torres Roldan VD, Nayfeh T, et al. Comparing complication rates of midline catheter vs peripherally inserted central catheter. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023; 10:ofad024.
Swaminathan L, Flanders S, Horowitz J, et al. Safety and outcomes of midline catheters vs peripherally inserted central catheters for patients with short-term indications. A multicenter study. JAMA Intern Med 2022; 182:50–58.
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240606 Date Completed: 20240627 Latest Revision: 20240627
رمز التحديث: 20240627
DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001387
PMID: 38841917
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1473-6500
DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000001387