دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

High economic inequality is linked to greater moralization.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: High economic inequality is linked to greater moralization.
المؤلفون: Kirkland K; Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3052, Australia.; School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia., Van Lange PAM; Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1075 BT, The Netherlands., Gorenz D; Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA., Blake K; Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3052, Australia., Amiot CE; Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, H2L 2C4, Canada., Ausmees L; Institute of Psychology, University of Tartu, Tartu, 50090, Estonia., Baguma P; Department of Educational, Organizational and Social Psychology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda., Barry O; Department of Psychology, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, 10700, Senegal., Becker M; CLLE, CNRS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, 31058, France., Bilewicz M; Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, 00-183, Poland., Boonyasiriwat W; Faculty of Psychology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand., Booth RW; Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Sabanci University, Istanbul, 34956, Turkey., Castelain T; Serra Húnter Fellow, Department of Psychology, University of Girona, Girona, 17004, Spain., Costantini G; Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, 20126, Italy., Dimdins G; Department of Psychology, University of Latvia, Riga, LV-1586, Latvia., Espinosa A; Departamento Académico de Psicología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, 15088, Peru., Finchilescu G; Psychology Department, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2017, South Africa., Fischer R; School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, 6012, New Zealand., Friese M; Department of Psychology, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany., Gómez Á; Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, UNED, Madrid, 28040, Spain., González R; Escuela de Psicología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, 8331150, Chile., Goto N; Graduate School of Social Sciences, Hitotsubashi University, Kunitachi, 186-8601, Japan., Halama P; Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences, The Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, 814 38, Slovakia., Hurtado-Parrado C; School of Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA., Ilustrisimo RD; Department of Psychology, University of San Carlos, Cebu City, 6000, Philippines., Jiga-Boy GM; School of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, SA2 8PP, UK., Kuppens P; Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium., Loughnan S; School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK., Mastor KA; School of Liberal Studies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, 43600, Malaysia., McLatchie N; Faculty of Science and Technology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, England, LA1 4YW, UK., Novak LM; Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA., Onyekachi BN; Department of Psychology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, 410105, Nigeria., Rizwan M; Department of Clinical Psychology, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, 46220, Pakistan., Schaller M; Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada., Serafimovska E; Institute for Sociological Political and Juridical Research, Ss Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Skopje, 1000, Macedonia., Suh EM; Department of Psychology, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, South Korea., Swann WB Jr; Psychology Department, The University of Texas, Austin, TX, 78712, USA., Tong EMW; Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, 119077, Singapore., Torres A; Departamento de Psicologia, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, 58051-900, Brazil., Turner RN; School of Psychology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT7 1NN, UK., Vauclair CM; Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), CIS-IUL, Lisbon, 1649-026, Portugal., Vinogradov A; Faculty of Psychology, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, 01033, Ukraine., Wang Z; School of Social Development and Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.; School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia., Yeung VWL; Department of Psychology, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, China.; Wofoo Joseph Lee Consulting and Counselling Psychology Research Centre, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, China., Bastian B; Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
المصدر: PNAS nexus [PNAS Nexus] 2024 Jun 05; Vol. 3 (7), pp. pgae221. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 05 (Print Publication: 2024).
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Oxford University Press on behalf of the National Academy of Sciences Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9918367777906676 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2752-6542 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 27526542 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PNAS Nexus Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: [Oxford] : Oxford University Press on behalf of the National Academy of Sciences, [2022]-
مستخلص: Throughout the 21st century, economic inequality is predicted to increase as we face new challenges, from changes in the technological landscape to the growing climate crisis. It is crucial we understand how these changes in inequality may affect how people think and behave. We propose that economic inequality threatens the social fabric of society, in turn increasing moralization-that is, the greater tendency to employ or emphasize morality in everyday life-as an attempt to restore order and control. Using longitudinal data from X, formerly known as Twitter, our first study demonstrates that high economic inequality is associated with greater use of moral language online (e.g. the use of words such as "disgust", "hurt", and "respect'). Study 2 then examined data from 41 regions around the world, generally showing that higher inequality has a small association with harsher moral judgments of people's everyday actions. Together these findings demonstrate that economic inequality is linked to the tendency to see the world through a moral lens.
(© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of National Academy of Sciences.)
References: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):9-12. (PMID: 26162108)
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 21;11(1):1937. (PMID: 33479332)
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):. (PMID: 24403724)
Popul Dev Rev. 2018 Dec;44(4):695-722. (PMID: 30828111)
Psychol Rev. 2002 Jul;109(3):451-71. (PMID: 12088240)
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 Feb;14(1):37-48. (PMID: 20040614)
Psychol Rev. 2001 Oct;108(4):814-34. (PMID: 11699120)
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 5;11(1):21709. (PMID: 34741054)
Evol Psychol. 2021 Apr-Jun;19(2):14747049211021524. (PMID: 34112018)
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Nov;7(11):1899-1916. (PMID: 37563303)
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2022 Jan;13(1):210-219. (PMID: 34900092)
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jun;2(6):389-396. (PMID: 31024159)
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135. (PMID: 20550733)
Annu Rev Psychol. 2021 Jan 4;72:347-366. (PMID: 32886586)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Aug 28;115(35):8722-8727. (PMID: 30131431)
Sci Adv. 2021 Aug 13;7(33):. (PMID: 34389534)
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Oct;210:105202. (PMID: 34146989)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Dec;83(6):1423-40. (PMID: 12500822)
Science. 2011 May 27;332(6033):1100-4. (PMID: 21617077)
Nat Commun. 2023 Sep 6;14(1):5453. (PMID: 37673884)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Jun;88(6):895-917. (PMID: 15982112)
Psychol Sci. 2018 May;29(5):824-833. (PMID: 29558246)
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(6):1225-44. (PMID: 17100480)
Psychol Sci. 2019 Nov;30(11):1625-1637. (PMID: 31566081)
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Nov;1(11):769-771. (PMID: 31024117)
J Chin Polit Sci. 2022;27(2):375-398. (PMID: 34840491)
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 06;11(7):e0158370. (PMID: 27383133)
Psychol Sci. 2011 Sep;22(9):1095-100. (PMID: 21841151)
Br J Dev Psychol. 2020 Oct;38(4):512-528. (PMID: 32281134)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Aug;101(2):366-85. (PMID: 21244182)
Pediatrics. 2001 Aug;108(2):E31. (PMID: 11483841)
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Jun;30(6):673-84. (PMID: 15155032)
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 21;12(1):22102. (PMID: 36543793)
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jun;7(6):917-927. (PMID: 37037990)
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Mar;56(6):1321-33. (PMID: 12600368)
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Dec;47(4):1178-1198. (PMID: 25582811)
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 9;18(11):e0288790. (PMID: 37943753)
Sci Adv. 2020 Dec 11;6(50):. (PMID: 33310855)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Twitter; anomie; economic inequality; moral judgments; moralization
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240709 Latest Revision: 20240710
رمز التحديث: 20240710
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC11229818
DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae221
PMID: 38979080
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2752-6542
DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae221