دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Pregnant women autonomy when choosing their method of childbirth: Scoping review.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Pregnant women autonomy when choosing their method of childbirth: Scoping review.
المؤلفون: Mascarenhas Silva CH; Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.; Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit - Mater Dei Health Network, Belo Horizonte, Brazil., Laranjeira CLS; Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit - Mater Dei Health Network, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.; School of Medical Sciences of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.; Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil., Pinheiro WF; Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit - Mater Dei Health Network, Belo Horizonte, Brazil., de Melo CSB; Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit - Mater Dei Health Network, Belo Horizonte, Brazil., Campos E Silva VO; School of Medical Sciences of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil., Brandão AHF; Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit - Mater Dei Health Network, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.; Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil., Rego F; Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal., Nunes R; Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
المصدر: PloS one [PLoS One] 2024 Jul 11; Vol. 19 (7), pp. e0304955. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 11 (Print Publication: 2024).
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Review
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Personal Autonomy* , Pregnant Women*/psychology , Parturition* , Delivery, Obstetric*/methods , Cesarean Section*, Humans ; Female ; Pregnancy ; Choice Behavior
مستخلص: This paper has as its theme the autonomy of pregnant women in relation to choosing the method of birth for their child. The objective was to carry out a scoping review to study the literature and evidence of how autonomy is being offered to parturient women. Study design and location: In October 2023, a search was carried out using the terms "pregnant women" AND "delivery" AND "autonomy" in the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Scielo and LILACS. The search included articles from 2016 to 2023. Of the 179 articles found, 15 met the criteria and were selected for this review. Results: the pregnant woman's autonomy in choosing the method of childbirth is influenced by several factors, such as the obstetrician's recommendation, the medical team, and negative and positive experiences. Thus, when this autonomy is shared with the obstetrician, the obstetrician recommends cesarean section as the safest route, but does not explain the benefits and harms of both routes (vaginal and cesarean section), causing the woman to accept the cesarean section. Midwives recommend vaginal birth because they believe it to be natural and safe and explain the benefits and harms of both methods, respecting the pregnant woman's choice of the method she prefers. Conclusion: women have the fundamental right to choose their method of birth and must be properly guided throughout prenatal care, whether by an obstetrician or a midwife, about the options, risks and benefits of each method of childbirth, respecting the ethical principle of beneficence.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
(Copyright: © 2024 Mascarenhas Silva et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
References: J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Jul;40(7):967-971. (PMID: 29921432)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 19;20(1):309. (PMID: 32429857)
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):141-6. (PMID: 26134548)
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Mar;102(3):586-594. (PMID: 30448044)
Matern Child Health J. 2022 Apr;26(4):895-904. (PMID: 34817759)
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0192523. (PMID: 29466389)
J Perinat Med. 2017 Jul 26;45(5):551-557. (PMID: 27780155)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Aug 09;19(1):286. (PMID: 31399072)
J Med Ethics. 2014 Dec;40(12):857-60. (PMID: 24248807)
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2017 Apr 20;38(1):e64677. (PMID: 28443976)
Women Birth. 2020 Sep;33(5):e447-e454. (PMID: 31796343)
SSM Popul Health. 2017 Jan 19;3:201-210. (PMID: 29349217)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 18;22(1):134. (PMID: 35180852)
Pragmat Obs Res. 2022 Jul 15;13:59-73. (PMID: 35873720)
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. (PMID: 33782057)
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 10;58(9):. (PMID: 36143932)
Sante Publique. 2021 Mar 2;32(5):497-505. (PMID: 33723955)
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0171804. (PMID: 28231285)
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;67(12):1291-4. (PMID: 25034198)
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. (PMID: 30453902)
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;133(1):e73-e77. (PMID: 30575678)
Women Birth. 2023 Mar;36(2):e246-e253. (PMID: 35927213)
J Law Med. 2018 Feb;25(2):448-464. (PMID: 29978647)
Matern Child Health J. 2022 Apr;26(4):806-813. (PMID: 34731358)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 06;7:CD003766. (PMID: 28681500)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240711 Date Completed: 20240711 Latest Revision: 20240714
رمز التحديث: 20240714
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC11238978
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304955
PMID: 38990936
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0304955