دورية أكاديمية

The Case of the Cookie Jar: Differences in Typical Language Use in Dementia.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The Case of the Cookie Jar: Differences in Typical Language Use in Dementia.
المؤلفون: Fromm D; Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA., Dalton SG; Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA., Brick A; Department of Statistics and Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA., Olaiya G; Department of Statistics and Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA., Hill S; Department of Statistics and Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA., Greenhouse J; Department of Statistics and Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA., MacWhinney B; Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
المصدر: Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD [J Alzheimers Dis] 2024 Jul 10. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 10.
Publication Model: Ahead of Print
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: IOS Press Country of Publication: Netherlands NLM ID: 9814863 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1875-8908 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 13872877 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Alzheimers Dis Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Amsterdam ; Washington : IOS Press, c1998-
مستخلص: Background: Findings from language sample analyses can provide efficient and effective indicators of cognitive impairment in older adults.
Objective: This study used newly automated core lexicon analyses of Cookie Theft picture descriptions to assess differences in typical use across three groups.
Methods: Participants included adults without diagnosed cognitive impairments (Control), adults diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (ProbableAD), and adults diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cookie Theft picture descriptions were transcribed and analyzed using CLAN.
Results: Results showed that the ProbableAD group used significantly fewer core lexicon words overall than the MCI and Control groups. For core lexicon content words (nouns, verbs), however, both the MCI and ProbableAD groups produced significantly fewer words than the Control group. The groups did not differ in their use of core lexicon function words. The ProbableAD group was also slower to produce most of the core lexicon words than the MCI and Control groups. The MCI group was slower than the Control group for only two of the core lexicon content words. All groups mentioned a core lexicon word in the top left quadrant of the picture early in the description. The ProbableAD group was then significantly slower than the other groups to mention a core lexicon word in the other quadrants.
Conclusions: This standard and simple-to-administer task reveals group differences in overall core lexicon scores and the amount of time until the speaker produces the key items. Clinicians and researchers can use these tools for both early assessment and measurement of change over time.
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; language; mild cognitive impairment; speech
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240712 Latest Revision: 20240712
رمز التحديث: 20240713
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-230844
PMID: 38995772
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE