دورية أكاديمية
Mechanical strength of stock and custom abutments as original and aftermarket components after thermomechanical aging.
| العنوان: | Mechanical strength of stock and custom abutments as original and aftermarket components after thermomechanical aging. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Pol CWP; Department of Integrated Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands., Cune MS; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, St. Antonius hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands., Raghoebar GM; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands., Naves LZ; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands., Meijer HJA; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. |
| المصدر: | Clinical and experimental dental research [Clin Exp Dent Res] 2024 Aug; Vol. 10 (4), pp. e892. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101692332 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2057-4347 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20574347 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Clin Exp Dent Res Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: Hoboken : Wiley, [2015]- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Dental Abutments* , Dental Implant-Abutment Design* , Dental Stress Analysis* , Dental Restoration Failure* , Materials Testing*, Humans ; Stress, Mechanical ; Dental Implants |
| مستخلص: | Objectives: The study aimed to assess the impact on the mechanical strength and failure patterns of implant-abutment complexes of choosing different abutment types, designs and manufacturers, aiding in selecting the optimal restorative solution. Stock and custom abutments from original and aftermarket suppliers were subjected to thermomechanical aging. Material and Methods: Stock and custom abutments from the implant manufacturer (original) and a aftermarket supplier (nonoriginal) were connected to identical implants with internal connection. Custom abutments were designed in a typical molar and premolar design, manufactured using the workflow from the respective suppliers. A total of 90 implants (4 mm diameter, 3.4 mm platform, 13 mm length) equally divided across 6 groups (three designs, two manufacturers) underwent thermo-mechanical aging according to three different regimes, simulating five (n = 30) or 10 years (n = 30) of clinical function, or unaged control (n = 30). Subsequently, all samples were tested to failure. Results: During aging, no failures occurred. The mean strength at failure was 1009N ± 171, showing significant differences between original and nonoriginal abutments overall (-230N ± 27.1, p < .001), and within each abutment type (p = .000), favoring original abutments. Aging did not significantly affect the failure load, while the type of abutment and manufacturer did, favoring original and custom-designed abutments. The most common failure was implant bending or deformation, significantly differing between original and nonoriginal abutments and screws. All failure tests resulted in clinically unsalvageable implants and abutments. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, original abutments exhibited a higher mechanical strength compared to the nonoriginal alternative, regardless of the amount of simulated clinical use. Similarly, custom abutments showed higher mechanical strength compared to stock abutments. However, mechanical strength in all abutments tested was higher than average chewing forces reported in literature, thus components tested in this study can be expected to perform equally well in clinical situations without excessive force. (© 2024 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.) |
| References: | Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:160-183. (PMID: 30306682) J Prosthodont. 2022 Aug;31(7):e21-e52. (PMID: 34866275) Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Feb;22(2):195-200. (PMID: 21044162) Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020 Jan/Feb;40(1):31-37. (PMID: 31815970) J Prosthodont Res. 2022 Jul 30;66(3):476-483. (PMID: 34866067) J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Jan;121(1):143-150. (PMID: 30006227) Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Mar 15;32(5):992–1000. (PMID: 28296983) Int J Prosthodont. 2016 May-Jun;29(3):253-5. (PMID: 27148984) Dent Mater. 2009 Mar;25(3):348-52. (PMID: 18829097) J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Jul;126(1):94.e1-94.e9. (PMID: 34006366) J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Sep;80(3):330-6. (PMID: 9760366) J Biomech. 1992 Feb;25(2):175-87. (PMID: 1733993) Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Dec;29(12):1230-1238. (PMID: 30537302) Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Oct;32 Suppl 21:254-288. (PMID: 34642991) Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jan;25(1):74-81. (PMID: 23735182) Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Dec;19(12):1276-84. (PMID: 19040443) Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Mar-Apr;16(2):167-71. (PMID: 12737249) Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2010 Jul;1(3-4):9-13. (PMID: 22238709) Coll Antropol. 2002 Jun;26(1):293-302. (PMID: 12137312) J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Feb;45(2):147-160. (PMID: 28940725) Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 May;30(5):476-486. (PMID: 31033047) J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Jan;77:470-474. (PMID: 29032313) Microsc Res Tech. 2020 Sep;83(9):1118-1123. (PMID: 32643268) Biomed Res Int. 2018 Dec 30;2018:2958982. (PMID: 30719437) J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2022;32(3):21-28. (PMID: 35993986) Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Apr;29(4):411-423. (PMID: 29527740) J Prosthodont. 2011 Oct;20(7):510-6. (PMID: 21910778) J Oral Implantol. 2014 Apr;40(2):123-8. (PMID: 22251283) J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Oct;32(7):662-672. (PMID: 32715619) J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Oct;114(4):513-6. (PMID: 26050025) J Prosthodont Res. 2012 Jan;56(1):19-24. (PMID: 21398198) Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Apr;23(2):216-227. (PMID: 33533116) J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Feb;39 Suppl 12:133-8. (PMID: 22533953) J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Nov;88(5):498-502. (PMID: 12473999) J Oral Rehabil. 2011 Oct;38(10):754-80. (PMID: 21241351) Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:359-373. (PMID: 30328203) Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Jan-Feb;15(1):20-7. (PMID: 11887595) Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Aug 15;31(6):1292-7. (PMID: 27525518) J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Sep;62:333-346. (PMID: 27239815) Dent Mater. 2014 Apr;30(4):408-16. (PMID: 24507998) J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Aug;112(2):136-42. (PMID: 24725612) Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Feb 19;34(5):1161–1168. (PMID: 30892291) Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Nov/Dec;33(6):1229-1239. (PMID: 30427953) |
| معلومات مُعتمدة: | ZimVie dental; External Research Agreement with an effective date; 91111.006 Netherlands ZONMW_ ZonMw |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: dental implants; dental implant‐abutment designs; materials testing; nonoriginal components |
| المشرفين على المادة: | 0 (Dental Implants) |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20240725 Date Completed: 20240725 Latest Revision: 20240728 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240728 |
| مُعرف محوري في PubMed: | PMC11271801 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/cre2.892 |
| PMID: | 39052871 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder كن أول من يترك تعليقا!