دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Mechanism Linking Cigarette Pack Factors, Point-of-Sale Marketing and Individual Factors With Smoking Intention Among School-Going Adolescents.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Mechanism Linking Cigarette Pack Factors, Point-of-Sale Marketing and Individual Factors With Smoking Intention Among School-Going Adolescents.
المؤلفون: Jetly K; Herbal Medicine Research Centre, Institute of Medical Research, National Institutes of Health, Shah Alam Selangor, Malaysia (Dr Jetly); Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (Dr Ismail and Nawi); and Non-Communicable Disease Section, Disease Control Division (NCD), Ministry of Health Malaysia, Wilayah Persekutuan Putrajaya, Malaysia (Dr Hassan) Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia(Dr Ismail)., Ismail A, Hassan N, Nawi AM
المصدر: Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP [J Public Health Manag Pract] 2024 Nov-Dec 01; Vol. 30 (6), pp. 793-804. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 05.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9505213 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1550-5022 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10784659 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Public Health Manag Pract Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: 2003- : Hagerstown, MD : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Original Publication: Frederick, MD : Aspen Publishers, c1995-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Intention* , Marketing*/methods , Marketing*/statistics & numerical data , Schools*/statistics & numerical data , Schools*/organization & administration , Smoking*/psychology , Smoking*/epidemiology, Humans ; Adolescent ; Male ; Female ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Adolescent Behavior/psychology ; Tobacco Products/statistics & numerical data ; Students/psychology ; Students/statistics & numerical data
مستخلص: Context: Tobacco usage accounts for one of the most preventable causes of death.
Objective: This study aimed to explore mechanisms linking cigarette pack factors, point-of-sale marketing, and individual factors (psychological reactant trait) to predict smoking intention among school-going adolescents.
Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional study conducted among 6 urban secondary schools. A pretested and validated self-administered questionnaire was used. Data analysis for structural equation modeling was done using SMART-PLS v3.2.8.
Main Outcome Measure: The main outcome measure was to determine the direct and indirect effects of cigarette pack factors, point-of-sale marketing, and individual factors (psychological reactant trait) to predict smoking intention among school-going adolescents in a theory-based model.
Results: A total of 386 adolescents fulfilling the inclusion criteria participated. Pictorial warning message reactance (β = .153, P  ≤ .001), pack receptivity of conventional pack (β = .297, P  = .004), and psychological reactant trait (β = .174, P  ≤ .001) were positively related to smoking intention. Pictorial warning negative affect (β = -.153, P  = .001) was negatively related to smoking intention. The psychological reactant trait was positively related to message reactance (β = .340, P  ≤ .001). However, recall exposure to point-of-sale marketing and pack appraisal of conventional pack was not positively related to smoking intention (β = .038, P  = .22 and β = -.026, P  = .39, respectively). Pictorial warning message reactance also positively mediates the relationship between psychological reactant trait and smoking intention (β = 0.05, p = .001). The model has strong predictive power.
Conclusion: In conclusion, cigarette pack factors and psychological reactant traits are essential in predicting smoking intention. Hence, policymakers should consider these factors in developing smoking policies.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
References: Ma C, Xi B, Li Z, Wu H, Zhao M, Liang Y, et al. Prevalence and trends in tobacco use among adolescents aged 13-15 years in 143 countries, 1999-2018: findings from the Global Youth Tobacco Surveys. Lancet Child Adoles Health. 2021;5(4):245-255.
Centres of Disease Control and Prevention. Smoking and tobacco use 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/smokeless/products_marketing/index.htm . Accessed July 3, 2022.
Institute for Public Health. National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS) 2022: Adolescent Health Survey 2022. Ministry of Health Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; 2022.
Tan QY, Zomer E, Owen AJ, Chin KL, Liew D. Impact of tobacco use on health and work productivity in Malaysia. Tob Control. 2020;29(1):111-117.
World Health Organization. Coming of age: adolescent health 2019. https://www.who.int/health-topics/adolescents/coming-of-age-adolescent-health . Accessed July 3, 2022.
Jetly K, Ramli NS. Smoking in Malaysia: main issues and ways to overcome. IIUM Med J Malays. 2021;20(3):165-172.
Dela Peña JB, Ahsan HM, Tampus R, Botanas CJ, Dela Peña IJ, Kim HJ, et al. Cigarette smoke exposure during adolescence enhances sensitivity to the rewarding effects of nicotine in adulthood, even after a long period of abstinence. Neuropharmacology. 2015;99(December):9-14.
Lim KH, Lim HL, Teh CH, Kee CC, Khoo YY, Ganapathy SS, et al. Smoking among school-going adolescents in selected secondary schools in Peninsular Malaysia-findings from the Malaysian Adolescent Health Risk Behaviour (MyaHRB) study. Tob Induc Dis. 2017;15(1):1-8.
Miller CH, Quick BL. Sensation seeking and psychological reactance as health risk predictors for an emerging adult population. Health Commun. 2010;25(3):266-275.
O’Loughlin J, O’Loughlin EK, Wellman RJ, Sylvestre M-P, Dugas EN, Chagnon M, et al. Predictors of Cigarette Smoking Initiation in Early, Middle, and Late Adolescence. J Adolesc Health. 2017;61(3):363-370.
Sargent JD, Gabrielli J, Budney A, Soneji S, Wills TA. Adolescent smoking experimentation as a predictor of daily cigarette smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;175(Jun):55-59.
Talip T, Murang Z, Kifli N, Naing L. Systematic review of smoking initiation among Asian adolescents, 2005-2015: utilizing the frameworks of triadic influence and planned behavior. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(7):3341-3355.
Scalici F, Schulz PJ. Parents’ and peers’ normative influence on adolescents’ smoking: results from a Swiss-Italian sample of middle schools students. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2017;12(1):5.
Edwards R, Ajmal A, Healey B, Hoek J. Impact of removing point-of-sale tobacco displays: data from a New Zealand youth survey. Tob Control. 2017;26(4):392-398.
Finan LJ, Lipperman-Kreda S, Abadi M, Grube JW, Kaner E, Balassone A, et al. Tobacco outlet density and adolescents’ cigarette smoking: a meta-analysis. Tob Control. 2019;28(1):27-33.
He Y, Shang C, Huang J, Cheng K-W, Chaloupka FJ. Global evidence on the effect of point-of-sale display bans on smoking prevalence. Tob Control. 2018;27(e2):e98-e104.
Cho YJ, Thrasher JF, Yong -H-H, Szklo AS, O’Connor RJ, Bansal-Travers M, et al. Path analysis of warning label effects on negative emotions and quit attempts: a longitudinal study of smokers in Australia, Canada, Mexico, and the US. Soc Sci Med. 2018;197(Jan):226-234.
Hall MG, Marteau TM, Sunstein CR, Ribisl KM, Noar SM, Orlan EN, et al. Public support for pictorial warnings on cigarette packs: an experimental study of US smokers. J Behav Med. 2018;41(3):398-405.
Bekalu MA, Ramanadhan S, Bigman CA, Nagler RH, Viswanath K. Graphic and arousing? Emotional and cognitive reactions to tobacco graphic health warnings and associated quit-related outcomes among low SEP population groups. Health Commun. 2019;34(7):726-734.
Romer D, Ferguson SG, Strasser AA, Evans AT, Tompkins MK, Macisco J, et al. Effects of pictorial warning labels for cigarettes and quit-efficacy on emotional responses, smoking satisfaction, and cigarette consumption. Ann Behav Med. 2018;52(1):53-64.
Jetly K, Ismail A, Hassan N, Nawi AM. Perceived influence of plain cigarette packaging on smoking behavior: a systematic review. J Public Health Manage Pract. 2022;25(5):E757-E63.
Brehm JW. A theory of psychological reactance; 1966.
Dowd ET, Pepper HF, Seibel C. Developmental correlates of psychological reactance. J Cogn Psychother. 2001;15(3):239-252.
Miller CH, Burgoon M, Grandpre JR, Alvaro EM. Identifying principal risk factors for the initiation of adolescent smoking behaviors: the significance of psychological reactance. Health Commun. 2006;19(3):241-252.
Brehm SSB, Brehm JW. Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. Press NYA; 2019 [originally published 1981].
Hart PS, Nisbet EC. Boomerang effects in science communication: how motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Commun Res. 2011;39(6):701-723.
Lee H. Anti-smoking messages on the world wide web: content analysis of youth-oriented anti-smoking videos [Sic] on YouTube. University of Florida; 2008.
Ford A, MacKintosh AM, Moodie C, Richardson S, Hastings G. Cigarette pack design and adolescent smoking susceptibility: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2013;3(9):e003282.
Robertson L, Cameron C, McGee R, Marsh L, Hoek J. Point-of-sale tobacco promotion and youth smoking: a meta-analysis. Tob Control. 2016;25(e2):e83-e9.
Cho YJ, Thrasher JF, Yong HH, Szklo AS, O’Connor RJ, Bansal-Travers M, et al. Path analysis of warning label effects on negative emotions and quit attempts: a longitudinal study of smokers in Australia, Canada, Mexico, and the US. Soc Sci Med. 2018;197(Jan):226-234.
Memon MA, Ting H, Cheah JH, Thurasamy R, Chuah F, Cham TH. Sample size for survey research: review and recommendations. J Appl Struct Eq Model. 2020;4(2):1-20.
Moreira P, Cunha D, Inman RA. Addressing a need for valid measures of trait reactance in adolescents: a further test of the Hong psychological reactance scale. J Pers Assess. 2020;102(3):357-369.
Siahpush M, Shaikh RA, Robbins R, Tibbits M, Kessler AS, Soliman G, et al. Point-of-sale cigarette marketing and smoking-induced deprivation in smokers: results from a population-based survey. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):302.
Ford A. Packaging as a marketing tool: adolescents’ perceptions of branded and plain tobacco packaging; 2014.
Hall MG, Sheeran P, Noar SM, Boynton MH, Ribisl KM, Parada Jr H Jr, et al. Negative affect, message reactance and perceived risk: how do pictorial cigarette pack warnings change quit intentions? Tob Control. 2018;27(e2):e136-e42.
Hall MG, Sheeran P, Noar SM, Ribisl KM, Boynton MH, Brewer NT. A brief measure of reactance to health warnings. J Behav Med. 2017;40(3):520-529.
Andrews JC, Mays D, Netemeyer RG, Burton S, Kees J. Effects of e-cigarette health warnings and modified risk ad claims on adolescent e-cigarette craving and susceptibility. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019;21(6):792-798.
Ringle CM, Wende S, Becker J-M. SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt. SmartPLS GmbH; 2015.
Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Publications; 2015.
Kock N, Lynn G. Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: an illustration and recommendations. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2012;13(7):1-40.
Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Cham. Sage; 2021:1-29.
Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci. 1988;16(1):74-94.
Franke G, Sarstedt M. Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures. Internet Res. 2019;29(3):430-447.
Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci. 2015;43(1):115-135.
Ramayah T, Cheah J, Chuah F, Ting H, Memon M. A. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using smartPLS 3.0 An updated guide and practical guide to statistical analysis. 2nd ed. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia:Pearson;2018. 978-67.
Hahn E, Ang S. From the editors: new directions in the reporting of statistical results in the Journal of World Business. J World Bus. 2017;52(2):125-126.
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge; 1988.
Hayes AF. Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr. 2009;76(4):408-420.
Shmueli G, Ray S, Estrada JMV, Chatla SB. The elephant in the room: predictive performance of PLS models. J Bus Res. 2016;69(10):4552-4564.
Witten I, Frank E, Hall M, Pal CJ. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Technique. Morgan Kaufmann; 2016.
Shmueli G, Sarstedt M, Hair JF, Cheah J-H, Ting H, Vaithilingam S, et al. Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLS-predict. Eur J Mark. 2019;53(11):2322-2347.
Hong S-M, Faedda S. Refinement of the Hong psychological reactance scale. Educ Psychol Meas. 1996;56(1):173-182.
Richards AS, Larsen M. Anger expression moderates the effects of psychological reactance to sexual health messages. Health Commun. 2017;32(12):1491-1500.
LaVoie NR, Quick BL, Riles JM, Lambert NJ. Are graphic cigarette warning labels an effective message strategy? A test of psychological reactance theory and source appraisal. Commun Res. 2015;44(3):416-436.
Hall MG, Mendel JR, Noar SM, Brewer NT. Why smokers avoid cigarette pack risk messages: two randomized clinical trials in the United States. Soc Sci Med. 2018;213(Sept):165-172.
Hall MG, Sheeran P, Noar SM, Ribisl KM, Bach LE, Brewer NT. Reactance to Health Warnings Scale: development and validation. Ann Behav Med. 2016;50(5):736-750.
Brehm SS, Brehm JW. Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. Academic Press; 2013.
Byrne S, Hart PS. The boomerang effect a synthesis of findings and a preliminary theoretical framework. Ann Int Commun Assoc. 2009;33(1):3-37.
Lee SM, Chun S, Lee JS. The role of negative emotions pre-and post-implementation of graphic health warnings: longitudinal evidence from South Korea. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(15):5393.
Lindquist KA, Siegel EH, Quigley KS, Barrett LF. The hundred-year emotion war: are emotions natural kinds or psychological constructions? Comment Lench Flores Bench Psychol Bull. 2013;139(1):255-263.
Lee JG, Averett PE, Blanchflower T, Landi N, Gregory KR. “Their packaging has always been like a power”: a qualitative study of U.S. smokers’ perceptions of cigarette pack visual design features to inform product regulation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(10):1-11.
Hoon AS, Lee L. Assessing the effectiveness of standardised packaging as a tobacco control measure in Singapore: marketing and consumer psychology perspectives; 2018.
Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychol Rev. 1974;81(1):59.
Pramudya RC, Seo H-S. Hand-feel touch cues and their influences on consumer perception and behavior with respect to food products: a review. Foods. 2019;8(7):259.
Snow JC, Culham JC. The treachery of images: how realism influences brain and behavior. Trends Cogn Sci. 2021;25(6):506-519.
Izhar NA, Al-dheleai YM, Na KS. Teaching in the time of COVID-19: the challenges faced by teachers in initiating online class sessions. Int J Acad Res Bus Social Sci. 2021;11(2):1294-1306.
Ganesan B, Al-Jumaily A, Fong KN, Prasad P, Meena SK, Tong RK-Y. Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak quarantine, isolation, and lockdown policies on mental health and suicide. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12(April):1-12.
Scalici F, Schulz PJ. School policies and smoking intention in a Swiss sample of adolescents. Health Promot Int. 2020;35(5):1005-1014.
Luk TT, Wang MP, Leung LT, Wu Y, Chen J, Lam TH, et al. Associations of perceived interparental relationship, family harmony and family happiness with smoking intention in never-smoking Chinese children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(10):e017523.
Urrutia-Pereira M, Oliano VJ, Aranda CS, Mallol J, Solé D. Prevalence and factors associated with smoking among adolescents. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2017;93(3):230-237.
Yang Z, Floyd K, Tanner JF. Effects of antismoking messages from media on adolescent smoking: the roles of family, school, and culture. J Bus Res. 2019;103(October):222-231.
Karim AA, Inam S, Khan MTR, Shafique K. Exploring context specific anti-smoking warning labels on cigarette packs: a quasi-experiment. JPMA. 2022;72(1):71-78.
Mansour AY, Bakhsh Z. Factors affecting the perceived effectiveness of pictorial health warnings on cigarette packages in gulf countries: a cross-sectional study. Tob Use Insights. 2017;10(March):1179173X17698462.
Kollath-Cattano C, Osman A, Thrasher JF. Evaluating the perceived effectiveness of pregnancy-related cigarette package health warning labels among different gender/age groups. Addict Behav. 2017;66(March):33-40.
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240905 Date Completed: 20240923 Latest Revision: 20240923
رمز التحديث: 20240923
DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001960
PMID: 39236215
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1550-5022
DOI:10.1097/PHH.0000000000001960