دورية أكاديمية
Analyzing learning curve for supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in urology resident training programme: comparative analysis.
| العنوان: | Analyzing learning curve for supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in urology resident training programme: comparative analysis. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Arıkan Y; Departmant of Urology, İzmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Türkiye. dryusufarikan@gmail.com., Danacioğlu YO; Departmant of Urology, Bakırkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye., Özlü DN; Departmant of Urology, Bitlis State Hospital, Bitlis, Türkiye., Koraş Ö; Departmant of Urology, İzmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Türkiye., Emir B; Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, İzmir Katip Celebi University, İzmir, Türkiye., Keskin MZ; Departmant of Urology, İzmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Türkiye. |
| المصدر: | Urolithiasis [Urolithiasis] 2024 Sep 09; Vol. 52 (1), pp. 129. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 09. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article; Comparative Study |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 101602699 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2194-7236 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 21947228 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Urolithiasis Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: Berlin : Springer, [2013]- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous*/education , Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous*/methods , Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous*/adverse effects , Learning Curve* , Internship and Residency*/statistics & numerical data , Urology*/education , Kidney Calculi*/surgery, Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Supine Position ; Female ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Operative Time ; Patient Positioning ; Fluoroscopy ; Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data |
| مستخلص: | Introduction: This article attempts to provide a comprehensive review of the learning objectives and importance of the supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) technique. Material Method: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of Supine PCNL between January 2018 and January 2024. We divided the groups into 3: residents between 2 and 3 years (Group 1), residents between 4 and 5 years (Group 2), and endourologist (Group 3). The 2-3-year resident started to perform PCNL for the first time, while the 4-5-year resident started to perform Supine PCNL for the first time while previously performing prone PCNL. Results: Access, fluoroscopy, and operation time were higher in Group 1, shorter in Group 2, and shortest in Group 3 (p < 0.001). Postoperative length of stay and the need for additional treatment were found to be shorter (p < 0.001), and the stone-free rate (SFR) increased (p < 0.001) from Group 1 to Group 3. The highest complication rates were observed in Group 1 (p = 0.002). SFR rate increased as the number of cases increased in Group 1 patients. Success was stable after 46-60 cases in terms of SFR. In Group 2, the SFR rate was stable after 31-45. Cases: The most complications were observed in Group 1 and the least in Group 3. Conclusion: In 2-3-year residents, access time and fluoroscopy time decrease with experience. In 4-5-year residents, due to their expertise in prone PCNL, the operation time and fluoroscopy time decrease with the number of cases performed. SFR is higher after 46-60 cases for 2-3-year residents and 31-45 cases for 4-5-year residents. (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.) |
| References: | Birowo P, Tendi W, Widyahening IS et al (2020) Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. F1000Res 9:231. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22940.3. (PMID: 10.12688/f1000research.22940.3330143457509599) Zhang X, Xia L, Xu T et al (2014) Is the supine position superior to the prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)? Urolithiasis 42:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0614-3. (PMID: 10.1007/s00240-013-0614-324141694) Choudhury S, Sinha Roy PP, Pal DK (2024) Calcutta position: a new modified supine decubitus for supine PCNL. Urologia 91:125–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603231191268. (PMID: 10.1177/0391560323119126837632393) Batagello CA, Barone Dos Santos HD, Nguyen AH et al (2019) Endoscopic guided PCNL in the prone split-leg position versus supine PCNL: a comparative analysis stratified by Guy’s stone score. Can J Urol 26:9664–9674. (PMID: 30797250) Lim EJ, Tanidir Y, Ganesan S et al (2022) Influence of Webinar-based learning on practice of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: outcomes of a global survey. J Endourol 36:279–286. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2021.0445. (PMID: 10.1089/end.2021.044534583533) Birowo P, Rustandi R, Risky Raharja PA et al (2022) The learning curve for a single surgeon using ultrasonography to guide supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy with an alken metal telescopic dilator. Heliyon 2022 8:e12524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12524. (PMID: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12524) Pareek G, Hedican SP, Lee FT Jr, Nakada SY (2005) Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography. Urology 66(5):941–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.011. (PMID: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.01116286099) Thomas K, Smith NC, Hegarty N et al (2011) The Guy’s stone score–grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. Urology 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.026. Heidar NA, Labban M, Nguyen DD et al (2022) Does volume matter? Incorporating estimated stone volume in a nomogram to predict ureteral stone passage. Can Urol Assoc J 16:E150–E154. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.7364. (PMID: 10.5489/cuaj.736434672936) Özlü DN, Ekşi M, Şahin S et al (2024) Effect of access sheath diameter used in percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal function: a prospective randomized study. Urolithiasis 52:100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01582-3. (PMID: 10.1007/s00240-024-01582-338922347) Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. (PMID: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae152735421360123) Falahatkar S, Moghaddam AA, Salehi M et al (2008) Complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy comparison with the prone standard technique. J Endourol 22:2513–2517. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0463. (PMID: 10.1089/end.2008.046319046091) Sabnis R, Desai MR, Singh A (2022) Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 36:S35–S40. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0299. (PMID: 10.1089/end.2022.029936154451) Wang X, Zhang Y, Zhao F et al (2022) Learning curves of flexible ureteroscopy (275 cases) and Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (73 cases) in Pediatric stones: data from 348 children. J Endourol 36:1502–1508. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2021.0757. (PMID: 10.1089/end.2021.075735670260) Allen D, O’Brien T, Tiptaft R et al (2005) Defining the learning curve for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 19:279–282. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2005.19.279. (PMID: 10.1089/end.2005.19.27915865512) Tanriverdi O, Boylu U, Kendirci M et al (2007) The learning curve in the training of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 52:206–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.001. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.00117229522) Jang WS, Choi KH, Yang SC et al (2011) The learning curve for Flank Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a single surgeon’s experience. Korean J Urol 52:284–288. https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2011.52.4.284. (PMID: 10.4111/kju.2011.52.4.284215562173085623) Garg A, Yadav SS, Tomar V et al (2016) Prospective evaluation of learning curve of Urology residents for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Urol Pract 3:230–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urpr.2015.06.009. (PMID: 10.1016/j.urpr.2015.06.00937592550) Reddy SVK, Shaik AB, Srinivas K (2016) Surgical Training in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: The Learning Curve. Kidney Urol Res 2016;2:008. Quirke K, Aydin A, Brunckhorst O et al (2018) Learning curves in Urolithiasis surgery: a systematic review. J Endourol 32:1008–1020. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0425. (PMID: 10.1089/end.2018.042530039711) Negrete-Pulido O, Molina-Torres M, Castaño-Tostado E et al (2010) Percutaneous renal access: the learning curve of a simplified approach. J Endourol 24:457–460. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0210. (PMID: 10.1089/end.2009.021020055665) Ziaee SA, Sichani MM, Kashi AH et al (2010) Evaluation of the learning curve for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol J 7:226–231. (PMID: 21170850) Bucuras V, Bardan R, Muresan A et al (2011) The role of the learning curve in supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 1:A292–A292. Sahan M, Sarilar O, Savun M et al (2020) Adopting for Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: analyzing the learning curve of Tertiary Academic Center Urology Team. Urology 140:22–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.03.022. (PMID: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.03.02232268174) Falahatkar S, Esmaeili S, Rastjou Herfeh N et al (2022) The safety of continued low dose aspirin therapy during complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (csPCNL). Prog Urol 32:458–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2021.04.005. (PMID: 10.1016/j.purol.2021.04.00534154964) Ayranci A, Caglar U, Cakir H et al (2024) Inter-observer Reliability and Reproducibility of CROES, Guy’s and STONE Nephrolithometry Scoring systems for Predicting Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy outcomes. New J Urol 19:85–89. https://doi.org/10.33719/nju1388671. (PMID: 10.33719/nju1388671) Watterson JD, Soon S, Jana K (2006) Access related complications during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: urology versus radiology at a single academic institution. J Urol 176:142–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00489-7. (PMID: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00489-716753389) Jessen JP, Honeck P, Knoll T et al (2013) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under combined sonographic/radiologic guided puncture: results of a learning curve using the modified Clavien grading system. World J Urol 31:1599–1603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-1016-9. (PMID: 10.1007/s00345-012-1016-923283412) Yu W, Rao T, Li X et al (2017) The learning curve for access creation in solo ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy and the associated skills. Int Urol Nephrol 49:419–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1492-8. (PMID: 10.1007/s11255-016-1492-828035623) Falahatkar R, Falahatkar S, Khajavi Gaskarei MA et al (2024) The global, prevalence, and risk factors of postoperative fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Urol 11:253–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2022.04.008. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.04.00838680584) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Learning curve; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Renal stone; Supine position; Urology resident |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20240909 Date Completed: 20240909 Latest Revision: 20240909 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240909 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00240-024-01624-w |
| PMID: | 39249559 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Find this article in full text from Springer Verlag. 
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 2194-7236 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00240-024-01624-w |