دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

An 'alcohol health champions' intervention to reduce alcohol harm in local communities: a mixed-methods evaluation of a natural experiment.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: An 'alcohol health champions' intervention to reduce alcohol harm in local communities: a mixed-methods evaluation of a natural experiment.
المؤلفون: Burns EJ; School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, UK., de Vocht F; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK., Siqueira N; School of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK., Ure C; School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, UK., Audrey S; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK., Coffey M; School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, UK., Hare S; School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, UK., Hargreaves SC; School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, UK., Hidajat M; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK., Parrott S; School of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK., Scott L; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK., Cook PA; School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.
المصدر: Public health research (Southampton, England) [Public Health Res (Southampt)] 2024 Sep; Vol. 12 (9), pp. 1-135.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: NIHR Journals Library Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101653231 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2050-439X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20504381 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Public Health Res (Southampt) Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Southampton (UK) : NIHR Journals Library, [2013]-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Alcohol Drinking*/prevention & control , Cost-Benefit Analysis*, Humans ; Male ; Female ; England ; Adult ; Harm Reduction ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Focus Groups ; Health Promotion/methods ; Middle Aged ; Program Evaluation
مستخلص: Background: Globally alcohol consumption is a leading risk factor for premature death and disability and is associated with crime, social and economic consequences. Local communities may be able to play a role in addressing alcohol-related issues in their area.
Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and cost-benefit of an asset-based community development approach to reducing alcohol-related harm and understand the context and factors that enable or hinder its implementation.
Design: A mixed-methods evaluation. Area-level quasi-experimental trial analysed using four different evaluation methods (a stepped-wedge design where each area was a control until it entered the intervention, comparison to matched local/national controls and comparison to synthetic controls), alongside process and economic evaluations.
Setting: Ten local authorities in Greater Manchester, England.
Participants: The outcomes evaluation was analysed at an area level. Ninety-three lay persons representing nineareas completed questionnaires, with 12 follow-up interviews in five areas; 20 stakeholders representing ten areas were interviewed at baseline, with 17 follow-up interviews in eight areas and 26 members of the public from two areas attended focus groups.
Interventions: Professionals in a co-ordinator role recruited and supported lay volunteers who were trained to become alcohol health champions. The champion's role was to provide informal, brief alcohol advice to the local population and take action to strengthen restrictions on alcohol availability.
Main Outcome Measures: Numbers of alcohol-related hospital admissions, accident and emergency attendances, ambulance call-outs, street-level crime and antisocial behaviour in the intervention areas (area size: 1600-5500 residents). Set-up and running costs were collected alongside process evaluation data exploring barriers and facilitators.
Data Sources: Routinely collected quantitative data on outcome measures aggregated at the intervention area and matched control and synthetic control areas. Data from policy documents, licensing registers, meeting notes, invoices, time/cost diaries, training registers, questionnaires, interviews, reflective diaries and focus groups.
Results: The intervention rolled out in nine out of ten areas, seven of which ran for a full 12 months. Areas with better-established infrastructure at baseline were able to train more champions. In total, 123 alcohol health champions were trained (95 lay volunteers and 28 professionals): lay volunteers self-reported positive impact. Champions engaged in brief advice conversations more readily than taking action on alcohol availability. There were no consistent differences in the health and crime area-level indicators between intervention areas and controls, as confirmed by using three different analysis methods for evaluating natural experiments. The intervention was not found to be cost-beneficial.
Limitations: Although the sequential roll-out order of the intervention was randomised, the selection of the intervention areas was not. Self-reported impact may have been subject to social desirability bias due to the project's high profile.
Conclusions: There was no measurable impact on health and crime outcomes. Possible explanations include too few volunteers trained, volunteers being unwilling to get involved in licensing decisions, or that the intervention has no direct impact on the selected outcomes.
Future Work: Future similar interventions should use a coproduced community outcomes framework. Other natural experiment evaluations should use methodological triangulation to strengthen inferences about effectiveness.
Trial Registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN81942890.
Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme (NIHR award ref: 15/129/03) and is published in full in Public Health Research ; Vol. 12, No. 9. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
References: Cook PA, Hargreaves SC, Burns EJ, de Vocht F, Parrott S, Coffey M, et al. Communities in charge of alcohol (CICA): a protocol for a stepped-wedge randomised control trial of an alcohol health champions programme. BMC Public Health 2018;18:522. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5410-0.
World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health. 2018. URL: www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565639 (accessed May 2023).
Babor T, Casswell S, Graham K, Huckle T, Livingston M, Rehm J, et al. Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity: Research and Public Policy. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2022.
Laslett A-M, Room R, Waleewong O, Stanesby O, Callinan S. Harm to Others from Drinking: Patterns in Nine Societies. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. URL: www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241515368 (accessed May 2023).
McCarthy R, Mukherjee RAS, Fleming KM, Green J, Clayton-Smith J, Price AD, et al. Prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder in Greater Manchester, UK: an active case ascertainment study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2021;45:2271–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.14705.
Cook PA, Phillips-Howard PA, Morleo M, Harkins C, Briant L, Bellis MA. The big drink debate: perceptions of the impact of price on alcohol consumption from a large scale cross-sectional convenience survey in north west England. BMC Public Health 2011;11:664. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-664.
Campbell CA, Hahn RA, Elder R, Brewer R, Chattopadhyay S, Fielding J, et al., Task Force on Community Preventive Services. The effectiveness of limiting alcohol outlet density as a means of reducing excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms. Am J Prev Med 2009;37:556–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.028.
Fone D, Dunstan F, White J, Webster C, Rodgers S, Lee S, et al. Change in alcohol outlet density and alcohol-related harm to population health (CHALICE). BMC Public Health 2012;12:428. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-428.
World Health Organization. Addressing Alcohol Consumption and Socioeconomic Inequalities: How a Health Promotion Approach Can Help. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. URL: www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240043312 (accessed May 2023).
Fone DL, Farewell DM, White J, Lyons RA, Dunstan FD. Socioeconomic patterning of excess alcohol consumption and binge drinking: a cross-sectional study of multilevel associations with neighbourhood deprivation. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002337. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002337.
Probst C, Kilian C, Sanchez S, Lange S, Rehm J. The role of alcohol use and drinking patterns in socioeconomic inequalities in mortality: a systematic review. Lancet Public Health 2020;5:e324–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30052-9.
Bellis MA, Hughes K, Nicholls J, Sheron N, Gilmore I, Jones L. The alcohol harm paradox: using a national survey to explore how alcohol may disproportionately impact health in deprived individuals. BMC Public Health 2016;16:111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2766-x.
World Health Organization. Global NCD Target: Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. URL: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/312277 (accessed May 2023).
Probst C, Manthey J, Neufeld M, Rehm J, Breda J, Rakovac I, Ferreira-Borges C. Meeting the global NCD target of at least 10% relative reduction in the harmful use of alcohol: is the WHO European region on track? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:3423. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103423.
O’Donnell A, Anderson P, Newbury-Birch D, Schulte B, Schmidt C, Reimer J, Kaner E. The impact of brief alcohol interventions in primary healthcare: a systematic review of reviews. Alcohol Alcohol 2014;49:66–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agt170.
de Vocht F, Heron J, Angus C, Brennan A, Mooney J, Lock K, et al. Measurable effects of local alcohol licensing policies on population health in England. J Epidemiol Community Health 2016;70:231–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-206040.
de Vocht F, Heron J, Campbell R, Egan M, Mooney JD, Angus C, et al. Testing the impact of local alcohol licencing policies on reported crime rates in England. J Epidemiol Community Health 2017;71:137–45. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2016-207753.
Burton R, Henn C, Lavoie D, O'Connor R, Perkins C, Sweeney K, et al. A rapid evidence review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of alcohol control policies: an English perspective. Lancet 2017;389:1558–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32420-5.
Moyer A, Finney JW, Swearingen CE, Vergun P. Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a meta-analytic review of controlled investigations in treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking populations. Addiction 2002;97:279–92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00018.x.
Kaner EF, Beyer FR, Muirhead C, Campbell F, Pienaar ED, Bertholet N, et al. Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;2:CD004148. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004148.pub4.
D’Onofrio G, Degutis LC. Preventive care in the emergency department: screening and brief intervention for alcohol problems in the emergency department: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:627–38.
Havard A, Shakeshaft A, Sanson-Fisher R. Systematic review and meta-analyses of strategies targeting alcohol problems in emergency departments: interventions reduce alcohol-related injuries. Addiction 2008;103:368–76; discussion 377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02072.x.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Community Engagement: Improving Health and Wellbeing and Reducing Health Inequalities. 2016. URL: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng44 (accessed May 2023).
Offord DR. Selection of levels of prevention. Addict Behav 2000;25:833–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-4603(00)00132-5.
World Health Organisation. Tackling NCDs: ‘Best Buys’ and Other Recommended Interventions for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases. Geneva World Health Organisation; 2017. URL: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/259232 (accessed May 2023).
Derges J, Kidger J, Fox F, Campbell R, Kaner E, Hickman M. Alcohol screening and brief interventions for adults and young people in health and community-based settings: a qualitative systematic literature review. BMC Public Health 2017;17:562. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4476-4.
Public Health England. Community Champion Approaches: Rapid Scoping Review of Evidence. 2021. URL: www.gov.uk/government/publications/community-champion-approaches-rapid-scoping-review-of-evidence (accessed May 2023).
Licensing Act 2003. c.17. [cited 2005 Nov 24]. URL: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/17/contents (accessed October 2022).
McGrath M, Reynolds J, Smolar M, Hare S, Ogden M, Popay J, et al. Identifying opportunities for engaging the ‘community’ in local alcohol decision-making: a literature review and synthesis. Int J Drug Policy 2019;74:193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.09.020.
Kypri K, Maclennan B. Public participation in local alcohol regulation: findings from a survey of New Zealand communities. Drug Alcohol Rev 2014;33:59–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12094.
Reynolds J, McGrath M, Halliday E, Ogden M, Hare S, Smolar M, et al. ‘The opportunity to have their say?’ Identifying mechanisms of community engagement in local alcohol decision-making. Int J Drug Policy 2020;85:102909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102909.
Fitzgerald N, Winterbottom J, Nicholls J. Democracy and power in alcohol premises licensing: a qualitative interview study of the Scottish public health objective. Drug Alcohol Rev 2018;37:607–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12819.
David G, Cooper R, Dixon S, Holmes J. Exploring the implementation of public involvement in local alcohol availability policy: the case of alcohol licensing decision-making in England. Addiction 2022;117:1163–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15699.
Muhunthan J, Angell B, Hackett ML, Wilson A, Latimer J, Eades A-M, Jan S. Global systematic review of Indigenous community-led legal interventions to control alcohol. BMJ Open 2017;7:e013932. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013932.
Morgan A, Ziglio E. Revitalising the evidence base for public health: an assets model. IUHPE: Promotion and Education 2007;14:17–22.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Behaviour Change: General Approaches. 2007. URL: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph6 (accessed May 2023).
Friedli L. ‘What we’ve tried, hasn’t worked’: the politics of assets based public health1. Critical Public Health 2013;23:131–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2012.748882.
Lewin SA, Dick J, Pond P, Zwarenstein M, Aja G, Van Wyk B, et al. Lay health workers in primary and community health care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004015.pub2.
South J, Raine G, White J. Community Health Champions: Evidence Review. 2010. URL: https://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/id/eprint/7368/ (accessed March 2024).
Public Health England. A Guide to Community-Centred Approaches for Health and Wellbeing: Full Report. London: Public Health England; 2015. URL: www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-and-wellbeing-a-guide-to-community-centred-approaches (accessed May 2023).
Ure C, Hargreaves S, Burns E, Coffey M, Audrey S, Ardern K, Cook PA. An asset-based community development approach to reducing alcohol harm: exploring barriers and facilitators to community mobilisation at initial implementation stage. Health Place 2021;68:102504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102504.
Ure C, Burns EJ, Hargreaves SC, Hidajat M, Coffey M, de Vocht F, et al. How can communities influence alcohol licensing at a local level? Licensing officers’ perspectives of the barriers and facilitators to sustaining engagement in a volunteer-led alcohol harm reduction approach. Int J Drug Policy 2021;98:103412.
Hargreaves SC, Ure C, Burns EJ, Coffey M, Audrey S, Ardern K, Cook PA. A mixed methods analysis evaluating an alcohol health champion community intervention: how do newly trained champions perceive and understand their training and role? Health Soc Care Community 2022;30:e2737–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13717.
Burns EJ, Hargreaves SC, Ure C, Hare S, Coffey M, Hidajat M, et al. ‘A priori’ external contextual factors and relationships with process indicators: a mixed methods study of the pre-implementation phase of ‘Communities in Charge of Alcohol’. BMC Public Health 2022;22:2224. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14411-2.
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ; 2008;337:979–83. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1655.
Craig P, Cooper C, Gunnell D, Haw S, Lawson K, Macintyre S, et al. Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance. J Epidemiol Community Health 2012;66:1182–86. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2011-200375.
Lamont T, Barber N, Pury J, Fulop N, Garfield-Birkbeck S, Lilford R, et al. New approaches to evaluating complex health and care systems. BMJ 2016;352:i154. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i154.
Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Cooper C, et al. Process evaluation in complex public health intervention studies: the need for guidance. J Epidemiol Community Health 2014;68:101–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2013-202869.
Public Health England. Local Alcohol Profiles for England (March 2016 update). Public Health England; 2016. URL: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/503879/LAPE_March_2016_official_statistics_commentary.pdf (accessed May 2023).
Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014;348:g1687. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1687.
Lavoie D. Alcohol identification and brief advice in England: a major plank in alcohol harm reduction policy. Drug Alcohol Rev 2010;29:608–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00224.x.
Public Health England. Alcohol Licensing: Data for Public Health Teams. 2017. URL: www.gov.uk/government/publications/alcohol-licensing-data-for-public-health-teams (accessed May 2023).
Public Health England. National Drug Treatment Monitoring System (NDTMS): Adult Drug and Alcohol Treatment Business Definitions. 2020. URL: www.gov.uk/government/publications/business-definitions-for-adult-drug-and-alcohol-misuse-treatment-providers (accessed May 2023).
Rush B. Tiered frameworks for planning substance use service delivery systems: origins and key principles. Nord Stud Alcohol Drugs 2010;27:617–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/145507251002700607.
Office for National Statistics. Mid-2016 Population Estimates for LSOA in England and Wales. 2017. URL: www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/datasets/lowersuperoutputareamidyearpopulationestimates (accessed May 2023).
Department for Communities and Local Government. English Indices of Deprivation by LSOA. 2015. URL: www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2015 (accessed May 2023).
Office for National Statistics. Ethnic Group, NOMIS. 2011. URL: www.nomisweb.co.uk/census/2011/ks201ew (accessed May 2023).
Office for National Statistics. QS403EW – Tenure – People, NOMIS. 2011. www.nomisweb.co.uk/census/2011/qs403ew (accessed May 2023).
Consumer Data Research Centre. Access to Healthy Assets and Hazards Index (AHAH), Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC). 2019. URL: https://data.cdrc.ac.uk/dataset/access-healthy-assets-hazards-ahah (accessed September 2019).
de Vocht F, Katikireddi SV, McQuire C, Tilling K, Hickman M, Craig P. Conceptualising natural and quasi experiments in public health. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021;21:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01224-x.
Lawlor DA, Tilling K, Davey Smith G. Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 2016;45:1866–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw314.
Health and Social Care Information Centre. NHS Data Model and Dictionary. 2022. URL: www.datadictionary.nhs.uk/nhs_business_definitions/lower_layer_super_output_area.html (accessed May 2023).
Public Health England. Alcohol-Attributable Fractions for England: An Update. 2020. URL: www.gov.uk/government/publications/alcohol-attributable-fractions-for-england-an-update (accessed May 2023).
Public Health England. Alcohol-Attributable Fractions for England: An Update (Appendix 2: Technical Appendix). 2020. URL: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/890556/Appendix_2_Technical__appendix.pdf (accessed May 2023).
Office for National Statistics. Violent Crime and Sexual Offences – Alcohol-Related Violence. 2015. URL: www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/compendium/focusonviolentcrimeandsexualoffences/2015-02-12/chapter5violentcrimeandsexualoffencesalcoholrelatedviolence#type-of-violence (accessed May 2023).
Martin N, Newbury-Birch D, Duckett J, Mason H, Shen J, Shevills C, Kaner E. A retrospective analysis of the nature, extent and cost of alcohol-related emergency calls to the ambulance service in an English region. Alcohol Alcohol 2012;47:191–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agr158.
Office for National Statistics. People, Population and Community. 2021. URL: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity (accessed May 2023).
Hussey MA, Hughes JP. Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials 2007;28:182–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2006.05.007.
Brown CA, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006;6:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-54.
Berk R, MacDonald JM. Overdispersion and Poisson regression. J Quant Criminol 2008;24:269–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-008-9048-4.
Bernal JL, Cummins S, Gasparrini A. Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. Int J Epidemiol 2016;46:348–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw098.
Brannstrom L, Trolldal B, Menke M. Spatial spillover effects of a community action programme targeting on-licensed premises on violent assaults: evidence from a natural experiment. J Epidemiol Community Health 2016;70:226–30. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-206124.
Giorgino T. Computing and visualizing dynamic time warping alignments in R: the dtw package. J Stat Softw 2009;31:1–24. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v031.i07.
Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J. Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. J Am Stat Assoc 2010;105:493–505. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746.
Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J. Synth: an R package for synthetic control methods in comparative case studies. J Stat Softw 2011;42. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i13.
de Vocht F, McQuire C, Brennan A, Egan M, Angus C, Kaner E, et al. Evaluating the causal impact of individual alcohol licensing decisions on local health and crime using natural experiments with synthetic controls. Addiction 2020;115:2021–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15002.
de Vocht F, Tilling K, Pliakas T, Angus C, Egan M, Brennan A, et al. The intervention effect of local alcohol licensing policies on hospital admission and crime: a natural experiment using a novel Bayesian synthetictime-series method. J Epidemiol Community Health 2017;71:912–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2017-208931.
McQuire C, Tilling K, Hickman M, de Vocht F. Forecasting the 2021 local burden of population alcohol-related harms using Bayesian structural time-series. Addiction 2019;114:994–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14568.
Brodersen KH, Gallusser F, Koehler J, Remy N, Scott SL. Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models. Ann Appl Stat 2015;9:247–74. https://doi.org/10.1214/14-aoas788.
Scott SL, Varian H. Predicting the present with Bayesian structural time series. Int J Math Model Numer Optim 2014;5:4–23. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmmno.2014.059942.
Brodersen KH, Hauser A. An R Package for Causal Inference Using Bayesian Structural Time-Series Models. 2017. URL: http://google.github.io/CausalImpact/CausalImpact.html (accessed May 2023).
Orton L, Halliday E, Collins M, Egan M, Lewis S, Ponsford R, et al. Putting context centre stage: evidence from a systems evaluation of an area based empowerment initiative in England. Crit Public Health 2016;27:477–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2016.1250868.
Home Office. Revised Guidance issued under section 182 of the Licensing Act 2003. 2018. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/705588/Revised_guidance_issued_under_section_182_of_the_Licensing_Act_2003__April_2018_.pdf (accessed May 2023).
Bowen GA. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J 2009;9:27–40.
Hsieh H, Shannon S. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1277–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.
Alcohol Focus Scotland. Review of Statements of Licensing Policy 2013 to 2016. URL: www.alcohol-focus-scotland.org.uk/media/85184/Review-of-statements-of-licensing-policy-FINAL.pdf (accessed May 2023).
Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, MacFarlane A, Ballini L, Dowrick C, et al. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med 2010;8:63. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-63.
May C. Towards a general theory of implementation. Implement Sci 2013;8:18.
Procter S, Mutrie N, Davis A, Audrey S. Views and experiences of behaviour change techniques to encourage walking to work: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2014;14:868. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-868.
Morgan DL. Focus groups. Ann Rev Sociol 1996;22:129–52. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129.
Bengtsson M. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. Nurs Plus Open 2016;2:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001.
Bryman A, Burgess RG. Analysing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge; 1994.
Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls C, Ormston R (editors). Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2014.
Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 2000;320:114–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114.
Goldsmith L. Using framework analysis in applied qualitative research. Qual Rep 2021;26:2061–76. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5011.
Spencer L, Ritchie J, O’Connor W, et al. Analysis in Practice. 2nd edn. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2014.
Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2003.
Braun V, Clarke V. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2013.
Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health 2019;11:589–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
O’Brien B, Harris I, Beckman T, Reed D, Cook D. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 2014;89:1245–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
HM Treasury. The Green Book: Central Government Guidance on Appraisal and Evaluation. URL: www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-green-book-appraisal-and-evaluation-in-central-government (accessed March 2024).
HM Treasury PSTNNE. Supporting Public Service Transformation: Cost Benefit Analysis Guidance for Local Partnerships. URL: www.greatermanchester-ca.gov.uk/what-we-do/research/research-cost-benefit-analysis/ (accessed May 2023).
Drummond M, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon J, Tsuchiya A. Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.
Cunnama L, Sinanovic E, Ramma L, Foster N, Berrie L, Stevens W, et al. Using top-down and bottom-up costing approaches in LMICs: the case for using both to assess the incremental costs of new technologies at scale. Health Econ 2016;25(Suppl. 1):53–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3295.
Brooks ME, Kristensen K, Van Benthem KJ, Magnusson A, Berg CW, Nielsen A, et al. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J 2017;9:378–400.
Chamberlain P, Brown CH, Saldana L. The Stages of implementation completion (SIC). Implement Sci 2011;6:116. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-116.
King DK, Shoup JA, Raebel MA, Anderson CB, Wagner NM, Ritzwoller DP, Bender BG. Planning for implementation success using RE-AIM and CFIR frameworks: a qualitative study. Front Public Health 2020;8:59. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00059.
Home Office. Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill: Change the Requirement for a Licensing Authority to Publish their Licensing Policy Statement Every Three Years to Every Five Years. URL: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/98128/Licensing-Policy-Statement.pdf (accessed May 2023).
Morris M. Guest Post: Clarity Is King – The Evidence that Reveals the Desperate Need to Re-think the Way We Write. URL: https://gds.blog.gov.uk/2014/02/17/guest-post-clarity-is-king-the-evidence-that-reveals-the-desperate-need-to-re-think-the-way-we-write/ (accessed May 2023).
Home Office. Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill: Increase the Opportunities for Local Residents or Their Representative Groups to Be Involved in Licensing Decisions by Removing the Vicinity Test for Interested Parties. 2011. URL: www.gov.uk/government/publications/licensing-act-2003-removing-the-vicinty-test-for-interested-parties (accessed May 2023).
Home Office. Guidance on Mandatory Licensing Conditions 2010: For Suppliers of Alcohol and Enforcement Authorities in England and Wales. 2014. URL: www.gov.uk/government/publications/guidance-on-mandatory-licensing-conditions (accessed May 2023).
Quigg Z, Hughes K, Butler N, Ford K, Canning I, Bellis MA. Drink less enjoy more: effects of a multi-component intervention on improving adherence to, and knowledge of, alcohol legislation in a UK nightlife setting. Addiction 2018;113:1420–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14223.
Public Health England. Alcohol Licensing: A Guide for Public Health Teams. URL: www.gov.uk/guidance/alcohol-licensing-a-guide-for-public-health-teams (accessed May 2023).
Department of Health. Welsh Government. Department of Health Northern Ireland SG. UK Chief Medical Officers’ Low Risk Drinking Guidelines. URL: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/545937/UK_CMOs__report.pdf (accessed May 2023).
Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot 1997;12:38–48. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38.
Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci 2011;6:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
OCSI. LSOAs, LEPs and Lookups: A Beginner’s Guide to Statistical Geographies. URL: https://ocsi.uk/2019/03/18/lsoas-leps-and-lookups-a-beginners-guide-to-statistical-geographies/ (accessed May 2023).
Cheshire West and Chester Council. Statement of Licensing Policy: Licensing Act 2003. URL: www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/documents/business/licensing/licensing-act/statement-of-licensing-policy/statement-of-licensing-policy-licensing-act-2020.pdf (accessed December 2021).
Home Office. Minor Variations to Premises Licences or Club Premises Certificates: Guidance for Applicants. URL: www.gov.uk/government/publications/minor-variations-to-premises-licence-application-form (accessed December 2021).
NHS Digital. Statistics on Alcohol, England 2020. URL: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/statistics-on-alcohol/2020 (accessed December 2021).
Fitzgerald N, Manca F, Uny I, Martin JG, O’Donnell R, Ford A, et al. Lockdown and licensed premises: COVID-19 lessons for alcohol policy. Drug Alcohol Rev 2022;41:533–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.13413.
Alcohol Change UK. The Blue Light Project. URL: https://alcoholchange.org.uk/help-and-support/training/for-practitioners/blue-light-training (accessed May 2023).
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance. Medical Research Council; 2008. URL: www.mrc.ac.uk/complexinterventionsguidance (accessed September 2017).
Kaner E, Bland M, Cassidy P, Coulton S, Dale V, Deluca P, et al. Effectiveness of screening and brief alcohol intervention in primary care (SIPS trial): pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2013;346:e8501. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e8501.
Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res 2017;17:88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8.
Watson DP, Adams EL, Shue S, Coates H, McGuire A, Chesher J, et al. Defining the external implementation context: an integrative systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:209. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3046-5.
Hall N, Mooney JD, Sattar Z, Ling J. Extending alcohol brief advice into non-clinical community settings: a qualitative study of experiences and perceptions of delivery staff. BMC Health Serv Res 2019;19:11.
Mansdotter AM, Rydberg MK, Wallin E, Lindholm LA, Andréasson S. A cost-effectiveness analysis of alcohol prevention targeting licensed premises. Eur J Public Health 2007;17:618–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckm017.
Ramponi F, Walker S, Griffin S, Parrott S, Drummond C, Deluca P, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of public health interventions with impacts on health and criminal justice: an applied cross-sectoral analysis of an alcohol misuse intervention. Health Econ 2020;30:972–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4229.
Walker S, Griffin S, Asaria M, Tsuchiya A, Sculpher M. Striving for a societal perspective: a framework for economic evaluations when costs and effects fall on multiple sectors and decision makers. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2019;17:577–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-019-00481-8.
Anderson P, Chisholm D, Fuhr DC. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies and programmes to reduce the harm caused by alcohol. Lancet 2009;373:2234–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60744-3.
Equality Act 2010. c.15. [cited 2010 Oct 1]. URL: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents (accessed October 2022).
Farooqi A, Jutlla K, Raghavan R, Wilson A, Uddin MS, Akroyd C, et al. Developing a toolkit for increasing the participation of black, Asian and minority ethnic communities in health and social care research. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022;22:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01489-2.
NHS Digital. Sexual Orientation and Why It Is Important to Ask About. URL: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/data-collections-and-data-sets/data-sets/mental-health-services-data-set/submit-data/data-quality-of-protected-characteristics-and-other-vulnerable-groups/sexual-orientation (accessed May 2023).
Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, Seers K, Mockford C, Goodlad S, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ 2017;358:j3453. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j3453.
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: ALCOHOL; ASSET-BASED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; BRIEF INTERVENTION; COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT; LICENSING; NATURAL EXPERIMENT; STEPPED-WEDGE; TRIANGULATION; VOLUNTEERS
Local Abstract: [plain-language-summary] Alcohol consumption puts an individual’s health and social relationships at risk of harm. The more a person drinks, the more harmful it is. The harmful effects can place a burden on emergency services and hospitals. We wanted to find out whether community members can make a difference by taking action to address alcohol harm in their local area. Local councils in Greater Manchester developed a project called Communities in Charge of Alcohol, where volunteers in targeted local areas were trained to become ‘alcohol health champions’. Alcohol health champions gave alcohol-related brief advice to people to help them drink less. They had a say about when, where and how alcohol is sold by reporting issues to their local council. We compared numbers of alcohol-related hospital admissions, accident and emergency attendances, ambulance call-outs and reports of crime and antisocial behaviour between areas that had alcohol health champions with other similar areas in England that did not. We calculated how much it costs to run and whether Communities in Charge of Alcohol could save society money. Not as many volunteers came forward to become an alcohol health champion as hoped for. Those who did give alcohol-related brief advice to people. They preferred not to report issues about alcohol sales to their local council, either because it was too complicated or because they did not want to be called a ‘grass’. We did not find levels of alcohol harm changed in the Communities in Charge of Alcohol areas. Because of this, we could not demonstrate that Communities in Charge of Alcohol could save society money. Getting involved in alcohol licensing decisions needs to be made easier for communities, with more anonymity, through the support of professionals. More work needs to be done to understand whether giving brief advice can reduce alcohol harm in whole communities.
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240913 Date Completed: 20240913 Latest Revision: 20240913
رمز التحديث: 20240914
DOI: 10.3310/HTMN2101
PMID: 39268883
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2050-439X
DOI:10.3310/HTMN2101