دورية أكاديمية

Cardiovascular training vs. resistance training for improving quality of life and physical function in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomized controlled trial.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Cardiovascular training vs. resistance training for improving quality of life and physical function in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomized controlled trial.
المؤلفون: Abrahão, MI, Gomiero, AB, Peccin, MS, Grande, AJ, Trevisani, VFM
المصدر: Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology; May2016, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p197-201, 5p
مصطلحات موضوعية: CARDIOVASCULAR disease treatment, RESISTANCE training, QUALITY of life, RANDOMIZED controlled trials, SYSTEMIC lupus erythematosus, PATIENTS, MENTAL depression, COMPARATIVE studies, EXERCISE tests, EXERCISE therapy, HEALTH status indicators, RESEARCH methodology, MEDICAL cooperation, QUESTIONNAIRES, RESEARCH, STATISTICAL sampling, ACTIVITIES of daily living, EVALUATION research, EXERCISE tolerance, PSYCHOLOGY
مستخلص: Objectives: To compare the efficacy of cardiovascular training (CT) with resistance training (RT) in improving the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and physical function of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Method: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with participants randomly allocated to either a CT (n = 21), RT (n = 21), or control group (n = 21). The outcomes assessed were: HRQoL using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), severity of depression using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), disease activity using the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), and aerobic capacity using a 12-minute walk test (T12).Results: Sixty-three patients (61 women and two men), aged 42.9 ± 14.4 years, with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 28.7 ± 10.6 kg/m(2), disease duration of 3.8 ± 3.3 years, and not physically active participated in the study. HRQoL improved for both exercise groups but was superior in the RT group. There was no significant difference in physical function between the intervention groups, except for aerobic capacity. Neither training programme was associated with a change in disease activity.Conclusions: Exercise intervention proved to be better than not exercising. CT was better than RT in improving HRQoL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:03009742
DOI:10.3109/03009742.2015.1094126