دورية أكاديمية

Outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis performed at a single institution.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis performed at a single institution.
المؤلفون: Kohga, Atsushi, Suzuki, Kenji, Okumura, Takuya, Yamashita, Kimihiro, Isogaki, Jun, Kawabe, Akihiro, Kimura, Taizo
المصدر: Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery; Jan2019, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p74-80, 7p
مصطلحات موضوعية: CHOLECYSTITIS, CHOLECYSTECTOMY, GALLBLADDER, BILE, CALCULI, ABDOMINAL surgery
مستخلص: Introduction: Debate continues regarding the clinical outcomes of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) for acute cholecystitis (AC). The aim of this retrospective study was to compare clinical outcomes of ELC and DLC. Methods: This study consisted of 465 patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy for AC between January 2000 and February 2017. Patients were divided between an ELC group (patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 6 days of symptom onset, n = 288) and a DLC group (patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at least 7 days from symptom onset, n = 177), and clinical outcomes were compared. Results: Operation time (105 vs 124 min), length of postoperative hospital stay (4 vs 4 days), conversion rate (1.3% vs 10.7%), bile leak (0.3% vs 3.3%), residual calculus (2.4% vs 6.7%), and readmission (1.0% vs 6.7%) were significantly better in the ELC group. A history of upper abdominal surgery, grade II or grade III AC, preoperative percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage, and time between symptom onset and surgery of more than 7 days were independent risk factors for conversion. Conclusions: ELC for AC yields more favorable clinical outcomes than DLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:17585902
DOI:10.1111/ases.12487