دورية أكاديمية

Flexural strength of minimum thickness ceramic veneers manufactured with different techniques.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Flexural strength of minimum thickness ceramic veneers manufactured with different techniques.
المؤلفون: Rizzante, Fabio A. P., Soares-Rusu, Idiane B. L., Senna, Suellen S., Ramos-Tonello, Carla M., Mondelli, Rafael F. L., Ishikiriama, Sérgio K., Borges, Ana Flávia S., Gutmacher, Zvi
المصدر: Quintessence International; Apr2020, Vol. 51 Issue 4, p268-273, 6p, 1 Black and White Photograph, 3 Diagrams, 1 Chart
مصطلحات موضوعية: ANALYSIS of heavy metals, SILICATES analysis, COMPUTER-aided design, DENTAL resins, DENTAL veneers, DENTURES, LITHIUM, SCANNING electron microscopy, STATISTICS, PROSTHESIS design & construction, DATA analysis, TENSILE strength, ONE-way analysis of variance
مستخلص: The objective of the present study was to assess the effect of monolithic and bilayer restorations considering heat-pressed and milled/CAD/CAM reinforced lithium disilicate ceramic veneers, on the flexural strength after cementation. Method and materials: Thirty-five specimens were divided into five groups (n = 7), according to the restorative solution: 2-mm thickness composite resin (CR2); heat-pressed monolithic ceramic 0.6 mm (HPM), CAD/CAM monolithic ceramics 0.6 mm (CCM); heat-pressed monolithic ceramic 0.4 mm + 0.2 mm glass-ceramic (HPB); CAD/CAM monolithic ceramic 0.4 mm + 0.2 glass-ceramic (CCB). Specimens were cemented on composite resin bars and submitted to a threepoint bending test on a Universal Testing Machine, until fracture. Fractured samples were analyzed under stereomicroscope and SEM. Flexural strength data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey test. Results: The control group showed the highest flexural strength results (119.57 ± 19.49 MPa), with values similar to groups HPM (98 ± 25.62 MPa) and CCM (96.14 ± 20.60 MPa). Groups HPB and CCB showed lower values when compared with the other groups. Fracture started from the base on monolithic groups and from ceramic on bilayer groups. Conclusion: Both ceramic systems (CAD/ CAM and heat-pressed) have similar fracture strength, although bilayer restorations present lower strength when compared with monolithic ceramics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Quintessence International is the property of Quintessence Publishing Company Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:00336572
DOI:10.3290/j.qi.a44147