دورية أكاديمية

COMPARISON AND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT OF SLOPE CALCULATION ALGORITHMS ON DIFFERENT TERRAINS USING AERIAL SURVEY.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: COMPARISON AND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT OF SLOPE CALCULATION ALGORITHMS ON DIFFERENT TERRAINS USING AERIAL SURVEY.
المؤلفون: Singh, Y., Bhandari, S., Tamang, D., Basnet, A., Shrestha, R., Awasthi, B.
المصدر: International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences; 12/10/2019, Vol. XLII-5/W3, p129-136, 8p
مصطلحات موضوعية: AERIAL surveys, DIGITAL elevation models, GEOGRAPHIC information systems, ALGORITHMS
مستخلص: Digital Elevation Models are one of the important datasets of any Geographic Information System (GIS) and so are the parameters derived from them. One such parameter is slope, whose accuracy can have a significant effect on many engineering and construction works. This paper addresses the eight-slope calculation methods that are currently available to calculate slope value from a DEM and compares how these methods works on different slope range and values. These methods were applied to calculate slope from DEM of 30 m. To determine the method that calculates the most accurate slope value for a particular slope range by comparing them with actual slope value is the main objective of this paper. The methods 2FD, 3FD, 3FDWRD, Average Neighborhood, Constrained Quadratic Surface and FFD has given similar results across all slope range while the algorithms that appears to yield the most varying results are Maximum Max and Simple D. In addition, it is observed that the choice of algorithms is more important when grade slope is less than 10 percent. However, for terrains with above 10 percent slope, the choice of algorithms seems less important with only a difference of approximately 0.5 gradient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences is the property of Copernicus Gesellschaft mbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:16821750
DOI:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-W3-129-2019