دورية أكاديمية

Impact of different types of dental prostheses on oral-health-related quality of life: a prospective bicenter study of definitive and interim restorations.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Impact of different types of dental prostheses on oral-health-related quality of life: a prospective bicenter study of definitive and interim restorations.
المؤلفون: Winter, Anna, Erdelt, Kurt, Giannakopoulos, Nikolaos Nikitas, Schmitter, Marc, Edelhoff, Daniel, Liebermann, Anja, Winter, A, Erdelt, K, Giannakopoulos, N N, Schmitter, M, Edelhoff, D, Liebermann, A
المصدر: International Journal of Prosthodontics; Jul/Aug2021, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p441-447, 7p, 5 Charts
مصطلحات موضوعية: REMOVABLE partial dentures, DENTAL implants, ORAL health, QUALITY of life, OPERATIVE dentistry, TREATMENT effectiveness, LONGITUDINAL method
مستخلص: Purpose: To assess the impact of different types of dental prostheses, including definitive and interim restorations, on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) before and after prosthetic treatment.Materials and Methods: A total of 151 patients received prosthetic treatment at one of two German departments of prosthetic dentistry. The patients' OHRQoL was assessed using the German version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-G53) at baseline (T0) and at 1 week (T1) and 3 months (T2) after treatment. Patients were divided into 10 subgroups according to their pre- and posttreatment status. The effect of the type (no prosthesis; fixed prosthesis; removable prosthesis) and duration of wear (definitive; interim) of the restorations was evaluated. Results were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U tests with a significance level of P = .05.Results: The highest OHRQoL was recorded for patients with fixed restorations, as indicated by the fact that their OHIP scores were lowest. A significant improvement in OHRQoL (P ≤ .034) was observed for patients who needed prostheses and were then treated with removable or fixed restorations. The OHIP score was affected by a change in restoration type. Rehabilitation with definitive prostheses had a significant effect on posttreatment OHRQoL (P ≤ .006).Conclusion: In general, prosthetic rehabilitation by use of fixed or removable prostheses resulted in an improvement in OHRQoL. The use of the same type of restoration before and after treatment had a positive effect on OHRQoL. If possible, a change of restoration type should be avoided. For patients who require permanent prostheses, the use of fixed and removable restorations is recommended. For oral rehabilitation, fixed restorations should be preferred in order to achieve best possible improvement of OHIP score. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of Prosthodontics is the property of Quintessence Publishing Company Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:08932174
DOI:10.11607/ijp.7180