التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Ischaemic preconditioning improves upper-body endurance performance without altering V̇O2 kinetics. |
| المؤلفون: |
Bellini, D., Chapman, C., Peden, D., Hoekstra, S. P., Ferguson, R. A., Leicht, C. A. |
| المصدر: |
European Journal of Sport Science; Aug2023, Vol. 23 Issue 8, p1538-1546, 9p, 2 Charts, 2 Graphs |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
ISCHEMIA prevention, ENDURANCE sports training, CLINICAL trials, OXYGEN consumption, TORSO, BLOOD flow restriction training, EXERCISE physiology, DYNAMICS, ARM, HEART beat, LACTATES, EXERCISE, ATHLETIC ability, ARM exercises, ERGOMETRY |
| مستخلص: |
Purpose: Whilst pre-exercise ischaemic preconditioning (IPC) can improve lower-body exercise performance, its impact on upper-limb performance has received little attention. This study examines the influence of IPC on upper-body exercise performance and oxygen uptake (V̇O2) kinetics. Methods: Eleven recreationally-active males (24 ± 2 years) completed an arm-crank graded exercise test to exhaustion to determine the power outputs at the ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2) and V̇O2peak (40.0 ± 7.4 ml·kg−1·min−1). Four main trials were conducted, two following IPC (4 × 5-min, 220 mmHg contralateral upper-limb occlusion), the other two following SHAM (4 × 5-min, 20 mmHg). The first two trials consisted of a 15-minute constant work rate and the last two time-to-exhaustion (TTE) arm-crank tests at the power equivalents of 95% VT1 (LOW) and VT2 (HIGH), respectively. Pulmonary V̇O2 kinetics, heart rate, blood-lactate concentration, and rating of perceived exertion were recorded throughout exercise. Results: TTE during HIGH was longer following IPC than SHAM (459 ± 115 vs 395 ± 102 s, p =.004). Mean response time and change in V̇O2 between 2-min and end exercise (ΔV̇O2) were not different between IPC and SHAM for arm-cranking at both LOW (80.3 ± 19.0 vs 90.3 ± 23.5 s [p =.06], 457 ± 184 vs 443 ± 245 ml [p =.83]) and HIGH (96.6 ± 31.2 vs 92.1 ± 24.4 s [p =.65], 617 ± 321 vs 649 ± 230 ml [p =.74]). Heart rate, blood-lactate concentration, and rating of perceived exertion did not differ between conditions (all p ≥.05). Conclusion: TTE was longer following IPC during upper-body exercise despite unchanged V̇O2 kinetics. Highlights Whilst pre-exercise ischaemic preconditioning can improve lower-body exercise performance and alter V̇O2 kinetics, its impact on upper-limb performance has received little attention. An acute bout of ischaemic preconditioning prior to arm-crank ergometry exercise significantly improved time to exhaustion compared to a sham control condition. V̇O2 kinetics in response to ischaemic preconditioning remained unchanged, suggesting alternative mechanisms may explain performance improvements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of European Journal of Sport Science is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
PDF full text from Publisher