التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Acute lesion extension following pulmonary vein isolation with two novel single shot devices: Pulsed field ablation versus multielectrode radiofrequency balloon. |
| المؤلفون: |
My, Ilaria, Lemoine, Marc D., Butt, Mahi, Mencke, Celine, Loeck, Fabian W., Obergassel, Julius, Rottner, Laura, Wenzel, Jan‐Per, Schleberger, Ruben, Moser, Julia, Moser, Fabian, Kirchhof, Paulus, Reissmann, Bruno, Ouyang, Feifan, Rillig, Andreas, Metzner, Andreas |
| المصدر: |
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology; Sep2023, Vol. 34 Issue 9, p1802-1807, 6p, 1 Color Photograph, 1 Chart, 1 Graph |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
TROPONIN, INJECTIONS, RADIO frequency therapy, OPERATIVE surgery, CATHETER ablation, ATRIAL fibrillation, IMMUNOASSAY, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, PULMONARY veins, CATHETERS |
| مستخلص: |
Introduction: Pulsed‐field ablation (PFA) and the multielectrode radiofrequency balloon (RFB) are two novel ablation technologies to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). It is currently unknown whether these technologies differ in lesion formation and lesion extent. We compared the acute lesion extent after PVI induced by PFA and RFB by measuring low‐voltage area in high‐density maps and the release of biomolecules reflecting cardiac injury. Methods: PVI was performed with a pentaspline catheter (FARAPULSE) applying PFA or with the compliant multielectrode RFB (HELIOSTAR). Before and after PVI high‐density mapping with CARTO 3 was performed. In addition, blood samples were taken before transseptal puncture and after post‐PVI remapping and serum concentrations of high‐sensitive Troponin I were quantified by immunoassay. Results: Sixty patients undergoing PVI by PFA (n = 28, age 69 ± 12 year, 60% males, 39.3% persistent atrial fibrillation [AF]) or RFB (n = 32, age 65 ± 13 year, 53% males, 21.9% persistent AF) were evaluated. Acute PVI was achieved in all patients in both groups. Mean number of PFA pulses was 34.2 ± 4.5 and mean number RFB applications was 8.5 ± 3 per patient. Total posterior ablation area was significantly larger in PFA (20.7 ± 7.7 cm²) than in RFB (7.1 ± 2.09 cm²; p <.001). Accordingly, posterior ablation area for each PV resulted in larger lesions after PFA versus RFB (LSPV 5.2 ± 2.7 vs. 1.9 ± 0.8 cm², LIPV 5.5 ± 2.3 vs. 1.9 ± 0.8 cm², RSPV 4.7 ± 1.9 vs. 1.6 ± 0.5 cm², RIPV 5.3 ± 2.1 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7 cm,² respectively; p <.001). In a subset of 38 patients, increase of hsTropI was higher after PFA (625 ± 138 pg/mL, n = 28) versus RFB (148 ± 36 pg/mL, n = 10; p =.049) supporting the evidence of larger lesion extent by PFA. Conclusion: PFA delivers larger acute lesion areas and higher troponin release upon successful PVI than multielectrode RFB‐based PVI in this single‐center series. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
Full Text Finder