دورية أكاديمية
How Should one Speak of Christ? Dyophysitism and Socinianism Compared.
| العنوان: | How Should one Speak of Christ? Dyophysitism and Socinianism Compared. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Nemes, Steven |
| المصدر: | Toronto Journal of Theology; Nov2023, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p122-130, 9p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | SOCINIANISM, CHRISTOLOGY |
| مصطلحات جغرافية: | CALCHEDON (Extinct city) |
| Reviews & Products: | NEW Testament |
| People: | JESUS Christ |
| مستخلص: | Can it be theologically acceptable to say that Christ was not born of a woman, did not grow, did not increase in wisdom, did not eat or drink, did not hunger or thirst, did not suffer pain or exhaustion, did not die, and was not raised from the dead? This essay explores three possible answers to this question, two from a dyophysite point of view and the other from a Socinian viewpoint. It argues that either such speech is theologically acceptable because it is true of him in his divine nature, or else it is unacceptable because it is false in his one-and-only human nature. However, one cannot say it is true but objectionable because misleading without also calling into question the New Testament's way of speaking about Christ. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Toronto Journal of Theology is the property of University of Toronto Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Complementary Index |
| تدمد: | 08269831 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.3138/tjt-2022-0048 |