التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Using Sentiment Analysis to Understand Public Policy Nicknames: Obamacare and the Affordable Care Act. |
| المؤلفون: |
Lappeman, James, Goder, Aliah, Naicker, Kalencia, Faruki, Hamza, Gordon, Patrick |
| المصدر: |
Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing; Jul/Aug2024, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p347-363, 17p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
PATIENT Protection & Affordable Care Act, SENTIMENT analysis, SOCIAL media, GOVERNMENT policy, NICKNAMES |
| مستخلص: |
In this study, we compared the social media net sentiment of one policy with two names. Specifically, we analyzed Obamacare and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to understand how social media users engaged with each term on social media from March 2010 to March 2017. The net sentiment was measured with a sample of over 50 million micro-blogs, and the analysis was done using a combination of digital instruments and human validation. We found a significant difference between the social media engagement and sentiment of both terms, with the ACA performing significantly better than Obamacare, despite Obamacare's higher conversation volume. With the ACA having an average of 26% less negative sentiment than Obamacare, the findings of this study emphasize the need to be careful when attaching nicknames to public policy. The findings also have implications for policymakers and politicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Complementary Index |
PDF full text from Publisher 
Full Text Finder