دورية أكاديمية

Incivility, Mobbing, and Abusive Supervision: A Tripartite Scale Development Study.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Incivility, Mobbing, and Abusive Supervision: A Tripartite Scale Development Study.
المؤلفون: Sümer, H. Canan, Göncü-Köse, Aslı, Toker-Gültaş, Yonca, Acar, F. Pınar, Karanfil, Derya, Ok, A. Başak
المصدر: Journal of Psychology; 2024, Vol. 158 Issue 6, p428-457, 30p
مصطلحات موضوعية: MOBS, WORKPLACE incivility, OFFENSIVE behavior, CONFIRMATORY factor analysis, ORGANIZATIONAL commitment, SUPERVISION, MASLACH Burnout Inventory
مصطلحات جغرافية: TURKEY
مستخلص: Using qualitative and quantitative methodologies, in three consecutive studies with employed samples, we developed measures of workplace incivility, mobbing, and abusive supervision sensitive to the nuances of a non-Western context (i.e., Türkiye). In Study 1, we first conducted 15 focus groups (N = 149), identified culture-specific and universal themes underlying the focal mistreatment types, and developed the initial scales. We then pilot-tested (N = 427) and refined the scales using exploratory factor analytic procedures. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analyses (N range = 456-524) and associations between the new scales and their widely used counterparts (N = 353) yielded evidence for the construct validity of the scales. Study 2 also involved the development of short forms of relatively long incivility and abusive supervision scales. In Study 3 (N = 482), we first examined the extent to which the three scales were operationally distinct. Second, we examined the scales' ability to predict burnout and organizational commitment. Results supported operational distinctiveness as well as the criterion-related validity of the scales. A dominance analysis revealed that the three scales had equivalent contributions in explaining the two outcome variables, further justifying their distinctiveness. We argue that the use of present scales is not necessarily restricted to the Turkish context and may prove useful more broadly in other neo-traditional contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Psychology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:00223980
DOI:10.1080/00223980.2024.2321881