دورية أكاديمية

Comparison of Non-contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography and Intravenous Pyelogram for Detection of Patients With Urinary Calculi.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparison of Non-contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography and Intravenous Pyelogram for Detection of Patients With Urinary Calculi.
المؤلفون: Go San Lim, Seok Heun Jang, Jeong Hwan Son, Jae Won Lee, Jae Seung Hwang, Chae Hong Lim, Dae Ji Kim, Dae Sung Cho
المصدر: Korean Journal of Urology; Feb2014, Vol. 55 Issue 2, p120-123, 4p
مصطلحات موضوعية: URINARY calculi, COMPUTED tomography, DIAGNOSTIC imaging, PAIN, MEDICAL imaging systems
مستخلص: The aim of this study was to investigate the changing pattern in the use of intravenous pyelogram (IVP), conventional computed tomography (CT), and non-contrast- enhanced computed tomography (NECT) for evaluation of patients with acute flank pain. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 2,180 patients with acute flank pain who had visited Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital between January 2008 and December 2012 and analyzed the use of IVP, conventional CT, and NECT for these patients. Results: During the study period there was a significant increase in NECT use (p<0.001) and a significant decrease in IVP use (p<0.001). Conventional CT use was also increased significantly (p=0.001). During this time the proportion of patients with acute flank pain who were diagnosed with urinary calculi did not change significantly (p=0.971). Conclusions: There was a great shift in the use of imaging study from IVP to NECT between 2008 and 2012 for patients with acute flank pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Korean Journal of Urology is the property of Korean Urological Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:20056737
DOI:10.4111/kju.2014.55.2.120