التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
| العنوان: |
Hărţuirea psihologică a salariatului. Încălcarea demnităţii în muncă. Daune morale. (Romanian) |
| Alternate Title: |
Psychological harassment of the employee. Breach of the dignity in the workplace. Non-pecuniary damages. (English) |
| المؤلفون: |
Mateescu, Alina Mihaela |
| المصدر: |
Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă; 2020, Issue 6, p373-382, 10p |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: |
PROFESSIONAL employee training, INDUSTRIAL relations, WORK environment, JOB performance, AGE discrimination, BUSINESS travel, JOB involvement |
| Abstract (English): |
The court finds that the treatment applied to the claimant, for a long period, for the purpose of withdrawing the job duties, combined with the issue of letters to the respondent’s clients, being of denigrating nature against the claimant, shall represent actions materializing the psychological harassment of the latter, for the purpose of determining the employee to terminate the employment relationships with the respondent. It follows from the examination of evidence produced in the case that there was a repetitive behaviour of the employer, which determined the deliberate deterioration of the working conditions of the appellant, his isolation, by disregard actions before the employer’s clients to which the claimant traveled for business purposes and by actions of professional discredit of the claimant, as well as by non-assignment of the old job duties, withdrawal of the means needed for the performance of the old job duties and the assignment of certain duties below the professional training of the employee, for the purpose of determining him to terminate the employment relationships by resignation. Thus, the employer’s acts were likely to prejudice the dignity in work of the claimant appellant, by imprinting the feeling of usefulness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Romanian): |
Curtea constată că tratamentul aplicat reclamantului, pe o perioadă îndelungată de timp, în sensul retragerii sarcinilor de serviciu, combinată cu emiterea de adrese către clienţii intimatei, cu caracter denigrator la adresa reclamantului, reprezintă acţiuni ce concretizează hărţuirea psihologică a reclamantului, în vederea determinării salariatului să înceteze raporturile de muncă cu intimata. Din analiza probatoriului administrat în cauză, reiese că a existat un comportament repetitiv din partea angajatorului care a condus la deteriorarea intenţionată a condiţiilor de muncă ale apelantului, la izolarea acestuia, prin acţiuni de desconsiderare în faţa clienţilor angajatorului la care reclamantul se deplasa în interes de serviciu şi prin acţiuni de discreditare profesională a reclamantului, dar şi prin neatribuirea vechilor sarcini de serviciu, retragerea mijloacelor necesare îndeplinirii vechilor atribuţii şi atribuirea unor sarcini sub pregătirea profesională a salariatului, cu scopul determinării acestuia de a înceta prin demisie raporturile de muncă. Faptele angajatorului au fost astfel de natură a leza demnitatea în muncă a apelantului reclamant, prin imprimarea sentimentului de inutilitate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă is the property of Universul Juridic Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| قاعدة البيانات: |
Supplemental Index |
