Setting a research agenda for pediatric complementary and integrative medicine: A consensus approach

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Setting a research agenda for pediatric complementary and integrative medicine: A consensus approach
المؤلفون: Kathi J. Kemper, Sunita Vohra, Liliane Zorzela, Shay Pintov, Arine Vlieger
المصدر: Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 42:27-32
بيانات النشر: Elsevier BV, 2019.
سنة النشر: 2019
مصطلحات موضوعية: Complementary Therapies, Complementary and Manual Therapy, Conventional medicine, medicine.medical_specialty, Consensus, Adolescent, Delphi Technique, Cost effectiveness, Health Personnel, Psychological intervention, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Surveys and Questionnaires, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Health care, medicine, Humans, 030212 general & internal medicine, Advanced and Specialized Nursing, Integrative Medicine, Do no harm, business.industry, Reproducibility of Results, Research Personnel, Complementary and alternative medicine, Family medicine, Health Services Research, Integrative medicine, Sri lanka, business, Complementary medicine, 030217 neurology & neurosurgery
الوصف: Background Pediatric use of complementary medicine (CM) is common and offers numerous research questions about diverse therapies and conditions. Although research priorities for pediatric CM have been identified, there was a need to update in light of the rapid evolution of the field. Methods Building on previous work, we conducted an international, consensus-based 4-step modified Delphi process to develop and refine a pediatric CM research agenda, including on-line questionnaires and an in-person meeting. Participants included health care professionals, researchers, and educators. Results We received 376 responses; participants included conventional and CM providers, researchers, educators, administrators, and policy-makers from 15 countries (Australia, Bangladesh, Belgium, Canada, China, Germany, India, Israel, Italy, New Zealand, Norway, Sri Lanka, The Netherlands, United Kingdom, and United States). While it was recognized that each region must set their own priorities based on use, access, and expertise, a “minimum set” for a pediatric CM research agenda was identified. After three rounds of surveys, participants identified the highest priorities for pediatric CM research as: (i) safety of CM therapies for infants, children, and adolescents; (ii) conditions for which CM use is highly prevalent and for which conventional medicine lacks safe, cost-effective therapies; iii) therapies/therapists to be examined for quality and reproducibility of interventions, comparative and cost effectiveness, dose, etc.; and iv) identification of relevant outcomes and outcome measurement tools. Conclusions The results of our study identify that “first do no harm” is the leading research priority for pediatric CM research, followed by more research on effectiveness of CM therapies for conditions not safely and effectively treated with conventional care. In order to improve pediatric health care, interdisciplinary collaborative approaches are needed between CM and conventional providers and researchers.
تدمد: 0965-2299
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::0aed29b65439579afb4fd2777077ad18
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2018.10.022
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....0aed29b65439579afb4fd2777077ad18
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE