Comparison of efficacy, adverse effects and costs between 20 % ALA-PDT and 10 % ALA-PDT for the treatment of actinic keratosis in Chinese patients

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparison of efficacy, adverse effects and costs between 20 % ALA-PDT and 10 % ALA-PDT for the treatment of actinic keratosis in Chinese patients
المؤلفون: Xiuli Wang, Zhi Cao, Lei Shi, Peiru Wang, Zhongxia Zho, Guolong Zhang, Linglin Zhang, Lude Zhu
المصدر: Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy. 31
سنة النشر: 2019
مصطلحات موضوعية: medicine.medical_specialty, China, medicine.medical_treatment, Biophysics, Statistical difference, Photodynamic therapy, Dermatology, Lesion, Medicine, Humans, Pharmacology (medical), Treatment costs, Adverse effect, Photosensitizing Agents, business.industry, Actinic keratosis, Aminolevulinic Acid, medicine.disease, eye diseases, Clinical Practice, Keratosis, Actinic, Treatment Outcome, Oncology, Photochemotherapy, medicine.symptom, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, business
الوصف: Background 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a reliable treatment for actinic keratosis (AK), though the concentration of 20 % is applied in most ALA-PDT for the treatment of AK, it was found that 10 % ALA could achieve similar outcome during clinical practice. However, there are limited number of reports comparing the efficacy and the safety of ALA-PDT with different ALA doses when treating AK. Objectives This study was designed to compare the efficacy, the adverse effects and the costs of 10 % and 20 % ALA-PDT for AK treatment. Methods We reviewed the records of patients who had received ALA-PDT in our department between January 1, 2012, and April 30, 2017, the efficacy, the adverse effects were recorded, and the costs were analyzed. Follow-up data were collected until April 30, 2018. Results A total of 59 AK patients’ records were analyzed for the efficacy, the adverse events, the recurrence and the costs. All the AK lesions were tapped with plum-blossom needle as a pre-treatment before receiving ALA-PDT. There was no statistical difference between 10 % ALA-PDT and 20 % ALA-PDT in terms of efficacy and adverse events. In the 10 % ALA group, there was one recurrence out of 34 patients and in the 20 % group there were none. The average treatment cost of each lesion was significantly lower in 10 % ALA group than in 20 % ALA group. Conclusions 10 % ALA-PDT has similar efficacy and adverse effects as 20 % ALA-PDT with lower costs. Taken together, this supports the use of 10 % ALA-PDT in clinical practice.
تدمد: 1873-1597
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::219b97016352b2d39df888a029d34d21
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31786334
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....219b97016352b2d39df888a029d34d21
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE