Novel artificial intelligence algorithm: an accurate and independent measure of spinopelvic parameters

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Novel artificial intelligence algorithm: an accurate and independent measure of spinopelvic parameters
المؤلفون: Lindsay D, Orosz, Fenil R, Bhatt, Ehsan, Jazini, Marcel, Dreischarf, Priyanka, Grover, Julia, Grigorian, Rita, Roy, Thomas C, Schuler, Christopher R, Good, Colin M, Haines
المصدر: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 37:893-901
بيانات النشر: Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG), 2022.
سنة النشر: 2022
مصطلحات موضوعية: Sacrum, Lumbar Vertebrae, Artificial Intelligence, Lordosis, Quality of Life, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, General Medicine, Retrospective Studies
الوصف: OBJECTIVE The analysis of sagittal alignment by measuring spinopelvic parameters has been widely adopted among spine surgeons globally, and sagittal imbalance is a well-documented cause of poor quality of life. These measurements are time-consuming but necessary to make, which creates a growing need for an automated analysis tool that measures spinopelvic parameters with speed, precision, and reproducibility without relying on user input. This study introduces and evaluates an algorithm based on artificial intelligence (AI) that fully automatically measures spinopelvic parameters. METHODS Two hundred lateral lumbar radiographs (pre- and postoperative images from 100 patients undergoing lumbar fusion) were retrospectively analyzed by board-certified spine surgeons who digitally measured lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope. The novel AI algorithm was also used to measure the same parameters. To evaluate the agreement between human and AI-automated measurements, the mean error (95% CI, SD) was calculated and interrater reliability was assessed using the 2-way random single-measure intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). ICC values larger than 0.75 were considered excellent. RESULTS The AI algorithm determined all parameters in 98% of preoperative and in 95% of postoperative images with excellent ICC values (preoperative range 0.85–0.92, postoperative range 0.81–0.87). The mean errors were smallest for pelvic incidence both pre- and postoperatively (preoperatively −0.5° [95% CI −1.5° to 0.6°] and postoperatively 0.0° [95% CI −1.1° to 1.2°]) and largest preoperatively for sacral slope (−2.2° [95% CI −3.0° to −1.5°]) and postoperatively for lumbar lordosis (3.8° [95% CI 2.5° to 5.0°]). CONCLUSIONS Advancements in AI translate to the arena of medical imaging analysis. This method of measuring spinopelvic parameters on spine radiographs has excellent reliability comparable to expert human raters. This application allows users to accurately obtain critical spinopelvic measurements automatically, which can be applied to clinical practice. This solution can assist physicians by saving time in routine work and by avoiding error-prone manual measurements.
تدمد: 1547-5654
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::2e337b399d4ce26de449aa4716d37f24
https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.5.spine22109
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....2e337b399d4ce26de449aa4716d37f24
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE