Framing of nutrition policy issues in the Australian news media, 2008‐2018
| العنوان: | Framing of nutrition policy issues in the Australian news media, 2008‐2018 |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Katherine Cullerton, Kirstin Wise |
| المصدر: | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Vol 45, Iss 5, Pp 491-496 (2021) |
| بيانات النشر: | Wiley, 2021. |
| سنة النشر: | 2021 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | medicine.medical_specialty, obesity, Nutrition Policy, Politics, Political science, medicine, media analysis, Frame (artificial intelligence), Humans, Moral responsibility, Mass Media, News media, Government, framing, business.industry, Public health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Australia, Public relations, Framing (social sciences), nutrition, Content analysis, Public Health, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270, business, policy |
| الوصف: | Objective: Media framing of nutrition policy issues has been said to play a critical role in influencing public and political support for these issues. We examined the coverage of nutrition policy issues in the Australian news media to determine the key frames and expert sources used by the media. Methods: News articles published in Australia between 2008 and 2018 were retrieved from key media databases. Content analysis was used to identify nutrition policy issues reported and expert sources used. Frames were identified using a theoretical framework. Results: Seven nutrition policy categories were identified. Expert sources included representatives from public health, food industry and politicians. Six dominant frames were identified: government responsibility, industry responsibility, societal frame, individual responsibility, parental responsibility and nanny state frame. Nutrition experts tended to use thematic frames while government and food industry sources used episodic frames to deflect responsibility onto individuals. Conclusions: Despite high media representation of thematic frames and government responsibility in addressing nutrition policy issues, limited regulatory policy action has occurred in Australia. Implications for public health: Further research is needed to better understand different frames and their effectiveness in influencing public and political opinion. Greater coherence amongst health advocates would be beneficial to ensure a collective, recognised voice on issues. |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 1326-0200 1753-6405 |
| URL الوصول: | https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::5ee7caebfff9f258e7e743771fc2a619 https://doaj.org/article/827ebea321024124aed27bfbc854d8a8 |
| حقوق: | OPEN |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsair.doi.dedup.....5ee7caebfff9f258e7e743771fc2a619 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | OpenAIRE |
Full Text via ClinicalKey | تدمد: | 13260200 17536405 |
|---|