Indications for enucleation after uveal melanoma brachytherapy

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Indications for enucleation after uveal melanoma brachytherapy
المؤلفون: A.G. Amiryan, A.Yu. Tsygankov, V.V. Valskiy, I.S. Mironova, S.V. Saakyan
المصدر: Российский офтальмологический журнал, Vol 9, Iss 4, Pp 46-51 (2018)
بيانات النشر: Real Time Ltd, 2018.
سنة النشر: 2018
مصطلحات موضوعية: medicine.medical_specialty, локальная терапия, complications, business.industry, medicine.medical_treatment, Melanoma, Brachytherapy, Enucleation, эффективность, RE1-994, medicine.disease, брахитерапия, увеальная меланома, Ophthalmology, local treatment, efficiency, medicine, Radiology, uveal melanoma, business, энуклеация, осложнения, enucleation
الوصف: Purpose: to analyze indications for enucleation in uveal melanoma (UM) patients after brachytherapy (BT). Material and methods. 52 patients with UM (31 females and 21 males) aged 25 to 74 years (mean age 53.2 ± 12.3) underwent an enucleation after a previously administered BT. Tumor sizes before BT were 6.1 ± 2.1 (1.2-11) mm in thickness and 13.0 ±2.9 (6-19) mm in diameter. Immediately before enucleation, they were 5.3 ± 3.4 (1-17) mm and 12.4 ± 3.6 (5-20) mm respectively. The time span between BT and enucleation varied from 2 to 103 months (median, 25 months). 40 patients (77 %) had choroidal localization of UM (of these,16 had juxtapapillary localization), 10 patients (19.2 %) had ciliochoroidal localization, and 2 patients (3.8 %) had UM in the anterior areas of the eye (iris and ciliary body). Results. In more than a half of the patients (30 patients, or 58 %) tumor regrowth was detected 5-96 months after BT. The second frequent cause for enucleation was neovascular glaucoma found in 21 patients (40 %). Extraocular extension of UM, identified in 12 patients (23 %), took place 3-82 months after BT and turned out to be the third complication as far as frequency of occurrence is concerned. Conclusion. Tumor regrowth remained to be the main cause for secondary enucleation in UM patients after BT. As a matter of fact, complications that can require immediate enucleationmay develop at any time after BT (although the peak falls upon the first 2 years after BT. This fact confirms the need of lifelong follow-up of such patients. Hence, unfounded extension of indications for BT may result in ineffective prolongation of local treatment, a number of radiation complications requiring immediate secondary surgical treatment // Russian Ophthalmological Journal, 2016; 4: 46-51. doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2016-9-4-46-51.
اللغة: Russian
تدمد: 2587-5760
2072-0076
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::6b1af2bc76d90ed3a832b91e23ebc563
https://roj.igb.ru/jour/article/view/58
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....6b1af2bc76d90ed3a832b91e23ebc563
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE