[Vaginal LASER therapy for genito-urinary disorders: A systematic review and statement from the Committee for Female Urology and Pelviperineology of the French Association of Urology]

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: [Vaginal LASER therapy for genito-urinary disorders: A systematic review and statement from the Committee for Female Urology and Pelviperineology of the French Association of Urology]
المؤلفون: J, Klap, S, Campagne-Loiseau, N, Berrogain, P O, Bosset, V, Cardot, T, Charles, X, Deffieux, L, Donon, F, Girard, L, Peyrat, P, Roulette, C, Thuillier, B, Tibi, A, Vidart, L, Wagner, J-F, Hermieu, J-N, Cornu
المصدر: Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie. 31(11)
سنة النشر: 2020
مصطلحات موضوعية: Lasers, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Urology, Vagina, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Laser Therapy
الوصف: Vaginal LASER therapy is increasingly used in the field of urogynecology, but several points remain unclear. Our goal was to produce a systematic review of available evidence and provide a critical appraisal of available data.A systematic review until march 2020 was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane and Embase databases. All studies about vaginal LASER use in the field of urogynecology were included.Forty studies have been included (8 for genitourinary syndrome of menopause, 19 for stress urinary incontinence, 3 for overactive bladder, 7 for urogenital prolapse, 3 for other indications). Data were heterogeneous, and level of evidence was weak or very weak. Few studies were comparative, and only 3 were randomized). Mild improvement of symptoms and quality of life and limited satisfaction were seen for genitourinary syndrome, stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder and prolapse. Few adverse events were reported. However, major methodological biases were noted regarding efficacy and safety evaluation. No long-term results were available.While Vaginal LASER therapy seem to provide encouraging results, the level of evidence supporting its use was weak, especially regarding long-term outcomes. Studies of better quality are warranted before any recommendation can be made. Current use should be limited to clinical research.
اللغة: French
تدمد: 1166-7087
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=pmid________::a1904688bb47ada443358ba3bce09aec
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33516611
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.pmid..........a1904688bb47ada443358ba3bce09aec
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE