Delayed intracranial hemorrhage after mild traumatic brain injury in patients on oral anticoagulants: Is the juice worth the squeeze?

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Delayed intracranial hemorrhage after mild traumatic brain injury in patients on oral anticoagulants: Is the juice worth the squeeze?
المؤلفون: M, Covino, A, Manno, G M, Della Pepa, A, Piccioni, G, Tullo, M, Petrucci, S, Navarra, F, Sardeo, E, Torelli, R, Nicolò, B, Simeoni, L, Carbone, S, Gaudino, F, Franceschi
بيانات النشر: Verduci Editore s.r.l, 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, Male, Oral, Traumatic, Administration, Oral, Intracranial hemorrhage, Direct oral anticoagulants, Anticoagulation, Hospital, Brain Injuries, Traumatic, 80 and over, Humans, Mild traumatic brain injury, Blood Coagulation, Tomography, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Emergency Service, Settore MED/09 - MEDICINA INTERNA, Anticoagulants, Middle Aged, X-Ray Computed, Cross-Sectional Studies, Brain Injuries, Administration, Female, Emergency Service, Hospital, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Intracranial Hemorrhages
الوصف: Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (MTBI) in anticoagulated patients is a common challenge for Emergency Department (ED) Physicians. Anticoagulation is considered a risk factor for developing delayed intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after MTBI. The occurrence of this event in patients on Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) or Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) remains unclear. Primary endpoint: to analyze the role of anticoagulants as risk factors for developing delayed ICH after MTBI and evaluate the indications to repeat a cranial computed tomography (CT) after a period of observation. Secondary endpoint: to assess the difference in the prevalence rate of delayed ICH in patients on VKA versus those on DOACs.We evaluated all consecutive patients admitted to our ED for MTBI, which had a control CT for late ICH after a negative CT at admission. We used a propensity score match (PSM) on factors affecting the need for oral anticoagulation to adjust the comparison between anticoagulated vs. non-anticoagulated patients for the baseline clinical characteristics.Among 685 patients enrolled, 15 (2.2%) developed ICH at control CT. After PSM, the incidence of ICH, although slightly higher, was not statistically different in anticoagulated patients vs. non-anticoagulated (2.3% vs. 0.6%, p=0.371). Among the 111 patients on VKA, 5 (4.5%) had a late ICH, compared to 4 out of 99 (4.0%) on DOACs; the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.868).The risk of developing delayed ICH after MTBI in patients on anticoagulation therapy is low. After correction for baseline covariates, the risk does not appear higher compared to non-anticoagulated patients. Thus, a routine control CT scan seems advisable only for patients presenting a clinical deterioration. Larger, prospective trials are required to clarify the safety profile of DOACs vs. VKA in MTBI.
اللغة: English
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=pmid_dedup__::0f6afed1b32a0a4d0a4225974fece500
http://hdl.handle.net/10807/200113
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.pmid.dedup....0f6afed1b32a0a4d0a4225974fece500
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE