دورية أكاديمية

Long Term Prognostic Value of Contractile Reserve Assessed by Global Longitudinal Strain in Patients with Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Long Term Prognostic Value of Contractile Reserve Assessed by Global Longitudinal Strain in Patients with Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
المؤلفون: Rosina Arbucci, Diego M. Lowenstein Haber, María Graciela Rousse, Ariel K. Saad, Liliana Martínez Golleti, Natalio Gastaldello, Miguel Amor, Cristian Caniggia, Pablo Merlo, Gustavo Zambrana, Marcela Galello, Esteban Clos, Vicente Mora, Jorge A. Lowenstein
المصدر: Journal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 11, Iss 3, p 689 (2022)
بيانات النشر: MDPI AG, 2022.
سنة النشر: 2022
المجموعة: LCC:Medicine
مصطلحات موضوعية: aortic stenosis, exercise echocardiography, strain rate imaging, aortic valve replacement, Medicine
الوصف: Background. Left ventricle (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) at rest has shown prognostic value in patients (pts) with severe aortic stenosis (SAS). Contractile reserve (CR) during exercise stress echo (ESE) estimated via GLS (CR-GLS) could better stratify the asymptomatic patients who could benefit from early intervention. Aims. To determine the long-term prognostic value of CR-GLS in patients with asymptomatic SAS with an ESE without inducible ischemia. Additionally, to compare the prognostic value of CR assessed via ejection fraction (CR-EF) and CR-GLS. Methods. In a prospective, single-center, observational study between 2013 and 2019, 101 pts with asymptomatic SAS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 55% were enrolled. CR was considered present with an exercise-rest increase in LVEF (Simpson’s rule) ≥ 5 points and > 2 absolute points in GLS. Patients were assigned to 2 groups (G): G1: 56 patients with CR-GLS present; and G2: 45 patients CR-GLS absent. All patients were followed up. Results. G2 Patients were older, with lower exercise capability, less aortic valve area (AVA), a higher peak aortic gradient, and less LVEF (71.5% ± 5.9 vs. 66.8% ± 7.9; p = 0.002) and GLS (%) at exercise (G1: −22.2 ± 2.8 vs. G2: −18.45 ± 2.4; p = 0.001). During mean follow-up of 46.6 ± 3.4 months, events occurred in 45 pts., with higher incidence in G2 (G2 = 57.8% vs. G1 = 42.2%, p < 0.01). At Cox regression analysis, CR-GLS was an independent predictor of major cardiovascular events (HR: 1.98, 95% CI 1.09–3.58, p = 0.025). Event-free survival was lower for patients with CR-GLS absent (log rank test p = 0.022). CR-EF was not outcome predictive (log rank test p 0.095). Conclusions: In patients with asymptomatic SAS, the absence of CR-GLS during ESE is associated with worse prognosis. Additionally, CR-GLS was a better predictor of events than CR-EF.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2077-0383
Relation: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/3/689; https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0383
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030689
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/a12d1531467d4e048c87833adb15efa9
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.12d1531467d4e048c87833adb15efa9
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:20770383
DOI:10.3390/jcm11030689