دورية أكاديمية

Factors associated with vasovagal reactions in whole blood donors: A case–control study

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Factors associated with vasovagal reactions in whole blood donors: A case–control study
المؤلفون: Aaditya Shivhare, Abhishekh Basavarajegowda, K T Harichandrakumar, Pragya Silwal, Pruthvi Raj
المصدر: Asian Journal of Transfusion Science, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 41-49 (2022)
بيانات النشر: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2022.
سنة النشر: 2022
المجموعة: LCC:Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs
مصطلحات موضوعية: blood donor reactions, physical factors, psychosocial factors, vasovagal reactions, Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs, RC633-647.5
الوصف: BACKGROUND: Vasovagal reactions to blood donation though generally mild and account for about 1% of donations, causes embarrassment/injury to the donors, lower likely return rates for future donations etc. The workforce hours devoted to attending to those who reacted can also affect the efficiency of the blood centre. There are various factors, both modifiable and nonmodifiable, involved in the causation of such reactions. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify the factors associated with vasovagal donor reactions in a case–control study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a descriptive comparative study between donors who had VVRs (cases) and those who did not (controls) during or after blood donation from a single center in southern India. All the biophysical and demographic variables were collected from the donor records. In addition, a questionnaire was administered to the donors after donation within half an hour, addressing the psychosocial variables. All the data were captured in Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS for Windows version 20. RESULTS: A total of 178 donors who had donor reactions were included in the study with an equal number of controls who were age and sex-matched. Donors who had VVRs had an odds of 4.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4–7.7) of admitted anxiety for blood donation. They also had an odds of 4.4 (95% CI: 2.8–6.9) of disturbed sleep the night before blood donation. Having an accompanying person to the blood center was detrimental, with an odds of 0.32 (95% CI: 0.2–0.6). Donors with local complications such as hematoma, double prick, or delayed collection had an odds of 21.2 (95% CI: 1.8–159.8) of developing VVR. CONCLUSION: The psychosocial factors such as fear of the needle, the sight of the blood, state of mind, and quality and duration of sleep seem to have an association, adversely impacting the donors resulting in VVRs after/during blood donation.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 0973-6247
1998-3565
Relation: http://www.ajts.org/article.asp?issn=0973-6247;year=2022;volume=16;issue=1;spage=41;epage=49;aulast=Shivhare; https://doaj.org/toc/0973-6247; https://doaj.org/toc/1998-3565
DOI: 10.4103/ajts.ajts_90_21
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/3f9c5092850a427a99be9a4b2d036cae
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.3f9c5092850a427a99be9a4b2d036cae
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:09736247
19983565
DOI:10.4103/ajts.ajts_90_21