دورية أكاديمية

Reaching Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Does Not Correlate with Patient Satisfaction

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Reaching Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Does Not Correlate with Patient Satisfaction
المؤلفون: Adam Z. Khan, Alayna K. Vaughan, Zachary S. Aman, Mark D. Lazarus, Gerald R. Williams, Surena Namdari
المصدر: Journal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 13, Iss 9, p 2550 (2024)
بيانات النشر: MDPI AG, 2024.
سنة النشر: 2024
المجموعة: LCC:Medicine
مصطلحات موضوعية: shoulder, rotator cuff, patient-reported outcomes, patient satisfaction, Medicine
الوصف: Purpose: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) serve as metrics to gauge orthopedic treatment efficacy based on anchoring questions that do not account for a patient’s satisfaction with their surgical outcome. This study evaluates if reaching MCID, SCB, or PASS values for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Single Alpha Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) correlates with overall patient satisfaction. Methods: This was a single-institution, retrospective study of patients who underwent RCR from 2015 to 2019. Pre-operative and 2 year postoperative ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS scores were recorded. Patients underwent a survey to assess: (1) what is your overall satisfaction with your surgical outcome? (scale 1 to 10); (2) if you could go back in time, would you undergo this operation again? (yes/no); (3) for the same condition, would you recommend this operation to a friend or family member? (yes/no). Spearman correlation coefficients were run to assess relationship between reaching MCID, SCB, or PASS and satisfaction. Results: Ninety-two patients were included. Mean preoperative ASES was 51.1 ± 16.9, SANE was 43.3 ± 20.9, SST was 5.4 ± 2.9, and VAS was 4.6 ± 2.1. Mean 2 year ASES was 83.9 ± 18.5, SANE was 81.7 ± 27.0, SST was 9.8 ± 3.2, and VAS was 1.4 ± 1.9. Mean patient satisfaction was 9.0 ± 1.9; 89 (96.7%) patients would undergo surgery again and recommend surgery. Correlation for reaching PASS for SANE and satisfaction was moderate. Correlation coefficients were very weak for all other outcome metrics. Conclusions: Reaching MCID, SCB, and PASS in ASES, SANE, SST, or VAS following RCR did not correlate with a patient’s overall satisfaction or willingness to undergo surgery again or recommend surgery. Further investigation into the statistical credibility and overall clinical value of MCID, SCB, and PASS is necessary.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2077-0383
Relation: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/9/2550; https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0383
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092550
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/49c983ca2d6b4a2790e2380fe0a409f3
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.49c983ca2d6b4a2790e2380fe0a409f3
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:20770383
DOI:10.3390/jcm13092550