دورية أكاديمية

Health care delivery system contributions to management of newly diagnosed prostate cancer

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Health care delivery system contributions to management of newly diagnosed prostate cancer
المؤلفون: Noah Krampe, Samuel R. Kaufman, Mary K. Oerline, Dawson Hill, Megan E. V. Caram, Vahakn B. Shahinian, Brent K. Hollenbeck, Avinash Maganty
المصدر: Cancer Medicine, Vol 12, Iss 16, Pp 17346-17355 (2023)
بيانات النشر: Wiley, 2023.
سنة النشر: 2023
المجموعة: LCC:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
مصطلحات موضوعية: delivery system, prostate cancer, variation in treatment, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
الوصف: Abstract Background Despite clinical guidelines advocating for use of conservative management in specific clinical scenarios for men with prostate cancer, there continues to be tremendous variation in its uptake. This variation may be amplified among men with competing health risks, for whom treatment decisions are not straightforward. The degree to which characteristics of the health care delivery system explain this variation remains unclear. Methods Using national Medicare data, men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer between 2014 and 2019 were identified. Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to assess the association between use of treatment and health care delivery system determinants operating at the practice level, which included measures of financial incentives (i.e., radiation vault ownership), practice organization (i.e., single specialty vs. multispecialty groups), and the health care market (i.e., competition). Variance was partitioned to estimate the relative influence of patient and practice characteristics on the variation in use of treatment within strata of noncancer mortality risk groups. Results Among 62,507 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, the largest variation in the use of treatment between practices was observed for men with high and very high‐risk of noncancer mortality (range of practice‐level rates of treatment for high: 57%–71% and very high: 41%–61%). Addition of health care delivery system determinants measured at the practice level explained 13% and 15% of the variation in use of treatment among men with low and intermediate risk of noncancer mortality in 10 years, respectively. Conversely, these characteristics explained a larger share of the variation in use of treatment among men with high and very high‐risk of noncancer mortality (26% and 40%, respectively). Conclusions Variation among urology practices in use of treatment was highest for men with high and very high‐risk noncancer mortality. Practice characteristics explained a large share of this variation.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2045-7634
68511507
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2045-7634
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6349
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/68511507ff54470788d267bd51b9187a
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.68511507ff54470788d267bd51b9187a
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:20457634
68511507
DOI:10.1002/cam4.6349