دورية أكاديمية

Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning
المؤلفون: F. J. Voskens, E. M. van der Schans, J. P. Ruurda, I. A. M. J. Broeders
المصدر: BMC Surgery, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2022)
بيانات النشر: BMC, 2022.
سنة النشر: 2022
المجموعة: LCC:Surgery
مصطلحات موضوعية: Surgical robotics, Laparoscopic suturing, Robotic suturing, Learning curve, Medical robots and systems, Surgery, RD1-811
الوصف: Abstract Background Surgeons have widely adopted endoscopic suturing techniques using conventional laparoscopic instruments and the more advanced robotic systems. The FlexDex is a novel articulating laparoscopic needle driver providing enhanced dexterity in laparoscopic surgery. This study evaluates and compares the learning curve of endoscopic suturing with conventional laparoscopy, the FlexDex and robotic suturing in novices. Methods Participants performed a minimal invasive suturing task in three different ways in a randomized order: with a conventional laparoscopic needle driver, using the FlexDex needle driver and third, using the Da Vinci Si surgical system. Primary outcome was suturing task time. Secondary outcome parameters were assessment of suturing quality and workload perception. Results A total of 10 novice participants were included and completed a total of 300 sessions. Median (IQR) suturing time of the first 5 sessions was 231 s (188–291) in the laparoscopic group versus 378 s (282–471) in the FlexDex group versus 189 s (160–247) in the DaVinci Si group. The last 5 sessions showed significant reduction of median suturing time of 143 s (120–190), 232 s (180–265) and 172 s (134–199) respectively. Analysis identified that the learning curve for the laparoscopic needle driver and Da Vinci Si was reached in 5 sessions, compared to 8 sessions for the Flexdex. The laparoscopic needle driver and Da Vinci Si showed a significant shorter median suturing time compared to the FlexDex (p = 0.00). The FlexDex quality assessment scores were significantly lower compared to the laparoscopic (p = 0.00) and robotic (p = 0.00) scores and perceived workload remains high for the FlexDex users. Conclusions Ex vivo endoscopic suturing with the FlexDex demonstrated a prolonged learning curve compared to laparoscopic and robotic suturing. The learning curve of the FlexDex is fundamentally different from conventional laparoscopic and robotic instruments. This study provides further insights in the implementation and training of endoscopic suturing techniques.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1471-2482
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2482
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01513-2
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/6a7557f3de3c440cbffd2c50814342c0
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.6a7557f3de3c440cbffd2c50814342c0
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:14712482
DOI:10.1186/s12893-022-01513-2