دورية أكاديمية

Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of Reconstructed 3D Printed Rapid Prototyping Models and Conventional Stone Models with Different Ranges of Crowding: An In-vitro Study

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of Reconstructed 3D Printed Rapid Prototyping Models and Conventional Stone Models with Different Ranges of Crowding: An In-vitro Study
المؤلفون: Ankita M Mohite, Lalita G Nanjannawar, Jiwanasha M Agrawal, Sangamesh Fulari, Shraddha Shetti, Vishwal Kagi, Amol Shirkande, Sanjivani Gofane
المصدر: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, Vol 17, Iss 3, Pp ZC01-ZC05 (2023)
بيانات النشر: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited, 2023.
سنة النشر: 2023
المجموعة: LCC:Medicine
مصطلحات موضوعية: digital orthodontics, stereolithography, three-dimensional printing, Medicine
الوصف: Introduction: The digitalisation of dental models has made significant contribution to the current success of orthodontic practices. Rapid Prototyping (RP) is an innovative method of producing physical objects based on Computer-Aided Design (CAD) Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM). Aim: To compare the accuracy of the Three-Dimensional (3D) printed rapid prototyped models with orthodontic stone models across different ranges of crowding. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study carried out at the Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, Maharashtra, India during September 2019 to September 2020. A total of 36 rapid prototyped models were reconstructed from stone models using Light Emitting Diode (LED) scanner and Digital Light Processing (DLP) technology. Dental stone models and RP models were evaluated using digital caliper for different linear measurements and arch dimensions. The data was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0. To evaluate accuracy, t-test analyses and Bland-Altman plotting were performed. Results: T-test showed statistically non significant difference in all parameters of measurements of RP models when compared to stone models. According to Bland-Altman plotting. The mean difference between stone and RP models for the various degree of crowding was minimal and within ±0.07 mm in all planes. Conclusion: Discrepancy between dental plaster models and RP models were less than 0.5 mm which was considered clinically non significant. Suggesting that RP models can be effectively used as an alternative to stone models.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2249-782X
0973-709X
Relation: https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/17516/59169_CE[Ra1]_F(IS)_PF1(HB_OM)_PFA(SS)_PB(HB_SS)_PN(SS).pdf; https://doaj.org/toc/2249-782X; https://doaj.org/toc/0973-709X
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/59169.17516
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/e74d3cd9af1a4e0a892231d13d9842c7
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.74d3cd9af1a4e0a892231d13d9842c7
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:2249782X
0973709X
DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2023/59169.17516