دورية أكاديمية

Comparing Endovascular Approaches in Lower Extremity Artery Disease: Insights from a Network Meta-Analysis

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparing Endovascular Approaches in Lower Extremity Artery Disease: Insights from a Network Meta-Analysis
المؤلفون: Reka Aliz Lukacs, Lisa Ingrid Weisshaar, Daniel Tornyos, Andras Komocsi
المصدر: Journal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 13, Iss 4, p 1024 (2024)
بيانات النشر: MDPI AG, 2024.
سنة النشر: 2024
المجموعة: LCC:Medicine
مصطلحات موضوعية: peripheral artery disease, chronic limb ischemia, infrapopliteal, femoropopliteal, endovascular intervention, network meta-analysis, Medicine
الوصف: Background: Endovascular therapy offers an alternative for treating femoropopliteal (FP) and infrapopliteal (IP) lesions related to occlusive lower extremity artery disease. Despite numerous trials, the effectiveness of restenosis prevention using local drug delivery devices remains a topic of debate. Objectives: An updated systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted. Our overall aim was to summarize the most recent clinical evidence regarding endovascular approaches for FP and IP atherosclerotic lesions. Methods: We conducted a search for randomized trials in the MEDLINE database, and extracted data related to clinical endpoints. Our primary focus was on the rate of major adverse events (MAEs), including mortality, amputation, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). A multiple treatment network meta-analysis supplemented with component network analyses was performed to examine the impact of combined treatment. Results: Our search yielded 33 randomized controlled trials encompassing 5766 patients. This included 19 studies focused on femoropopliteal and 14 on IP lesions, accounting for 3565 and 2201 patients, respectively. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) displayed a reduced MAE risk in comparison to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA)—RR for DCB: 0.64 (95% CI: 0.52–0.77) and for DES: 0.71 (95% CI: 0.51–0.99). The bare-metal stent (BMS) group manifested the most substantial MAE risk, being 59% higher relative to the DCB cohort (BMS vs. DCB RR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.03–2.47). For FP lesions, DES was the standout performer, curtailing MAE risk by 55% relative to POBA. Within IP lesions, DES mitigated the MAE risk by 25% versus POBA. DCB did not exhibit any notable MAE reduction when pitted against POBA. Conclusion: In FP arteries, both DESs and DCBs yielded significantly diminished MAEs, thus outpacing other techniques. Regarding IP arteries, only DESs resulted in significantly fewer MAEs. In alignment with contemporary research, our findings revealed no signs of elevated mortality in patients undergoing treatment with drug-eluting apparatuses.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2077-0383
Relation: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/4/1024; https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0383
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13041024
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/821d504679f144eda81776df1a4a3427
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.821d504679f144eda81776df1a4a3427
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:20770383
DOI:10.3390/jcm13041024