دورية أكاديمية

Measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Measuring the impact of chronic low back pain on everyday functioning: content validity of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire
المؤلفون: Claire Burbridge, Jason A. Randall, Lucy Abraham, Elizabeth Nicole Bush
المصدر: Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 1-15 (2020)
بيانات النشر: SpringerOpen, 2020.
سنة النشر: 2020
المجموعة: LCC:Public aspects of medicine
مصطلحات موضوعية: Content validity, Concept elicitation, Cognitive debriefing, Chronic low back pain, PRO development, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
الوصف: Abstract Background Robust outcome measures are needed to assess and monitor the impact of chronic low back pain (CLBP) on physical functioning. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is a well-established measure designed to capture the impacts of back pain on everyday functioning, with a particular emphasis on physical functioning. It has documented evaluation of psychometric properties. However, there is no documented qualitative evidence to confirm the content validity of the tool, nor have changes made for electronic administration been debriefed in participants with CLBP. Methods In-depth, semi-structured, concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with 23 US participants with confirmed CLBP. Interviews allowed participants to describe the impact of CLBP on their day-to-day functioning and discuss comprehension and suitability of the RMDQ. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing revealed the substantial burden associated with CLBP, highlighting 15 key areas of functional impact. These were grouped into overarching themes of mobility (walking, stairs, sitting/standing, bending/kneeling, lifting, lying down), activities (chores/housework, dressing, washing, driving, work) and other (relationships/socializing, mood, sleep, appetite), which are consistent with those evaluated within the RMDQ. All participants found the RMDQ to be relevant with most reporting that the instructions, recall period, and response options were suitable. A few suggested minor changes, however, none were consistent or necessary to support content validity. Updates to the measure for electronic administration and to clarify the response options were well received. Conclusion The qualitative data from individuals with CLBP confirmed that the RMDQ has content validity and, alongside documented psychometric evidence, supports the use of the RMDQ as a reliable and valid tool to assess the impact of CLBP on physical functioning.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2509-8020
Relation: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41687-020-00234-5; https://doaj.org/toc/2509-8020
DOI: 10.1186/s41687-020-00234-5
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/f0149ab9eb7c4aa4820b3ac0108be394
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.f0149ab9eb7c4aa4820b3ac0108be394
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:25098020
DOI:10.1186/s41687-020-00234-5