دورية أكاديمية

Evaluating construct validity of computable acute respiratory distress syndrome definitions in adults hospitalized with COVID-19: an electronic health records based approach

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Evaluating construct validity of computable acute respiratory distress syndrome definitions in adults hospitalized with COVID-19: an electronic health records based approach
المؤلفون: Neha A. Sathe, Su Xian, F. Linzee Mabrey, David R. Crosslin, Sean D. Mooney, Eric D. Morrell, Kevin Lybarger, Meliha Yetisgen, Gail P. Jarvik, Pavan K. Bhatraju, Mark M. Wurfel
المصدر: BMC Pulmonary Medicine, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2023)
بيانات النشر: BMC, 2023.
سنة النشر: 2023
المجموعة: LCC:Diseases of the respiratory system
مصطلحات موضوعية: Electronic health records, Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Phenotyping, Coronavirus disease 2019, Construct validity, Diseases of the respiratory system, RC705-779
الوصف: Abstract Background Evolving ARDS epidemiology and management during COVID-19 have prompted calls to reexamine the construct validity of Berlin criteria, which have been rarely evaluated in real-world data. We developed a Berlin ARDS definition (EHR-Berlin) computable in electronic health records (EHR) to (1) assess its construct validity, and (2) assess how expanding its criteria affected validity. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study at two tertiary care hospitals with one EHR, among adults hospitalized with COVID-19 February 2020-March 2021. We assessed five candidate definitions for ARDS: the EHR-Berlin definition modeled on Berlin criteria, and four alternatives informed by recent proposals to expand criteria and include patients on high-flow oxygen (EHR-Alternative 1), relax imaging criteria (EHR-Alternatives 2–3), and extend timing windows (EHR-Alternative 4). We evaluated two aspects of construct validity for the EHR-Berlin definition: (1) criterion validity: agreement with manual ARDS classification by experts, available in 175 patients; (2) predictive validity: relationships with hospital mortality, assessed by Pearson r and by area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). We assessed predictive validity and timing of identification of EHR-Berlin definition compared to alternative definitions. Results Among 765 patients, mean (SD) age was 57 (18) years and 471 (62%) were male. The EHR-Berlin definition classified 171 (22%) patients as ARDS, which had high agreement with manual classification (kappa 0.85), and was associated with mortality (Pearson r = 0.39; AUROC 0.72, 95% CI 0.68, 0.77). In comparison, EHR-Alternative 1 classified 219 (29%) patients as ARDS, maintained similar relationships to mortality (r = 0.40; AUROC 0.74, 95% CI 0.70, 0.79, Delong test P = 0.14), and identified patients earlier in their hospitalization (median 13 vs. 15 h from admission, Wilcoxon signed-rank test P
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1471-2466
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2466
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-023-02560-y
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/fa88bb75be1c42fa943455768a04a123
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.fa88bb75be1c42fa943455768a04a123
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:14712466
DOI:10.1186/s12890-023-02560-y