دورية أكاديمية

Unravelling Student Evaluations of Courses and Teachers

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Unravelling Student Evaluations of Courses and Teachers
اللغة: English
المؤلفون: Reverter, Antonio, Martinez, Cristina, Currey, Phil (ORCID 0000-0003-4221-0690), van Bommel, Severine (ORCID 0000-0002-7782-9162), Hudson, Nicholas J. (ORCID 0000-0002-3549-9396)
المصدر: Cogent Education. 2020 7(1).
الإتاحة: Cogent OA. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
تاريخ النشر: 2020
نوع الوثيقة: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance, Course Evaluation, College Faculty, College Students, Coordinators, Response Rates (Questionnaires), Delivery Systems, Stimulation, Course Organization, Instructional Materials, Feedback (Response), Teaching Styles, Correlation, Agricultural Education, Foreign Countries
مصطلحات جغرافية: Australia
DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2020.1771830
تدمد: 2331-186X
مستخلص: There is debate over the functional basis of student evaluations of academics, and fresh potential for looking at the data in new ways. Student evaluation data was collated over a three year period (Semester 2 2015 to Semester 1 2018). We used a General Linear Model to estimate the variation in course scores explained by a number of coordinator and course attributes. Three significant factors collectively explain 49% of the School's variation in course scores--individual coordinator, student evaluation response rate, and mode of delivery. Next, we used hierarchical clustering to explore the inter-relationships among the eight course and teaching evaluation questions. Learning appears to be related to stimulation, whereas overall satisfaction appears to be related to quality of learning materials and course structure (i.e. aspects of course organisation). Student evaluation response rate is positively correlated to all eight course questions, but most positively to a question relating to receiving adequate feedback. This perhaps implies some reciprocity in the flow of information between student and coordinator. The overall teaching rating awarded to academics clusters most with approachability and encouragement of student input--aspects of temperament and style--and not with explanatory skill or organisational ability.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2021
رقم الأكسشن: EJ1282706
قاعدة البيانات: ERIC
الوصف
تدمد:2331-186X
DOI:10.1080/2331186X.2020.1771830