دورية أكاديمية

Effects of worksite health promotion interventions on employee diets: a systematic review.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Effects of worksite health promotion interventions on employee diets: a systematic review.
المؤلفون: Ni Mhurchu C; MRC Human Nutrition Research, Cambridge, UK. cliona.nimhurchu@mrc-hnr.cam.ac.uk, Aston LM, Jebb SA
المصدر: BMC public health [BMC Public Health] 2010 Feb 10; Vol. 10, pp. 62. Date of Electronic Publication: 2010 Feb 10.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Review; Systematic Review
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100968562 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-2458 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14712458 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Public Health Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Diet* , Health Promotion*/methods , Occupational Health Services*/methods, Humans ; Obesity/diet therapy ; Workplace
مستخلص: Background: Public health strategies place increasing emphasis on opportunities to promote healthy behaviours within the workplace setting. Previous research has suggested worksite health promotion programmes have positive effects on physical activity and weight loss, yet little is known regarding their effects on dietary behaviour. The aim of this review was to assess the effects of worksite interventions on employee diets.
Methods: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, EMBASE, LexisNexis) were searched for relevant articles published between 1995 and April 2009. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were peer-reviewed English language publications describing a worksite-based health promotion intervention with minimum study duration of eight weeks. All study designs were eligible. Studies had to report one or more diet-related outcome (energy, fat, fruit, or vegetable intakes). Methodological quality was assessed using a checklist that included randomisation methods, use of a control group, and study attrition rates.
Results: Sixteen studies were included in the review. Eight programmes focussed on employee education, and the remainder targeted change to the worksite environment, either alone or in combination with education. Study methodological quality was moderate. In general, worksite interventions led to positive changes in fruit, vegetable and total fat intake. However, reliance on self-reported methods of dietary assessment means there is a significant risk of bias. No study measured more robust outcomes such as absenteeism, productivity, or healthcare utilisation.
Conclusions: The findings of this review suggest that worksite health promotion programmes are associated with moderate improvement in dietary intake. The quality of studies to date has been frequently sub-optimal and further, well designed studies are needed in order to reliably determine effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Future programmes to improve employee dietary habits should move beyond individual education and aim to intervene at multiple levels of the worksite environment.
Number of References: 45
References: Health Promot Int. 2001 Mar;16(1):21-33. (PMID: 11257849)
Obes Rev. 2007 Mar;8 Suppl 1:vi-ix. (PMID: 17316292)
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Jul;29(1):61-70. (PMID: 15958254)
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Oct;37(4):340-57. (PMID: 19765507)
Health Promot Int. 2004 Jun;19(2):197-204. (PMID: 15128711)
Prev Med. 1999 Dec;29(6 Pt 1):563-70. (PMID: 10600438)
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002 Jun;28(3):141-57. (PMID: 12109553)
J Public Health Policy. 2003;24(1):5-25. (PMID: 12760241)
J Occup Environ Med. 2005 Jun;47(6):558-64. (PMID: 15951715)
Nutr Rev. 2006 Dec;64(12):518-31. (PMID: 17274494)
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33(8):807-16. (PMID: 19528969)
Ann Behav Med. 2007 Feb;33(1):39-48. (PMID: 17291169)
Occup Med (Lond). 1999 Nov;49(8):549-55. (PMID: 10658309)
Am J Public Health. 1998 Nov;88(11):1685-90. (PMID: 9807537)
Health Promot Int. 2004 Sep;19(3):335-43. (PMID: 15306618)
J Occup Environ Med. 1999 Jul;41(7):545-55. (PMID: 10412096)
BMJ. 2009 Sep 10;339:b3496. (PMID: 19744976)
Am J Public Health. 1999 Jan;89(1):54-60. (PMID: 9987465)
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Dec;59(12):1054-7. (PMID: 16286493)
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(2):421-6. (PMID: 18561517)
Lancet. 2003 Mar 1;361(9359):717-25. (PMID: 12620735)
Am J Public Health. 2007 Jul;97(7):1216-27. (PMID: 17538059)
BMJ. 2009 Apr 09;338:b1415. (PMID: 19359291)
Am J Public Health. 2001 Jan;91(1):112-7. (PMID: 11189801)
Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 Oct;1(4):A06. (PMID: 15670437)
Prev Med. 2002 Mar;34(3):313-23. (PMID: 11902848)
Dis Manag. 2006 Oct;9(5):284-90. (PMID: 17044762)
Public Health Nutr. 2004 Apr;7(2):263-70. (PMID: 15003133)
Am J Public Health. 1999 May;89(5):747-51. (PMID: 10224988)
J Am Diet Assoc. 2001 Feb;101(2):195-202. (PMID: 11271692)
JAMA. 2008 Dec 10;300(22):2631-7. (PMID: 19066383)
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Feb;83(2):100-8. (PMID: 15744402)
Am J Health Promot. 2008 Jul-Aug;22(6):408-16. (PMID: 18677881)
Lancet. 2002 Nov 2;360(9343):1347-60. (PMID: 12423980)
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Oct;37(4):330-9. (PMID: 19765506)
AAOHN J. 1994 May;42(5):236-40. (PMID: 8037825)
معلومات مُعتمدة: MC_U105960389 United Kingdom MRC_ Medical Research Council
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20100212 Date Completed: 20110809 Latest Revision: 20211020
رمز التحديث: 20231215
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC2829502
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-62
PMID: 20146795
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1471-2458
DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-10-62