دورية أكاديمية

Estimation of abdominal fat mass: validity of abdominal bioelectrical impedance analysis and a new model based on anthropometry compared with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Estimation of abdominal fat mass: validity of abdominal bioelectrical impedance analysis and a new model based on anthropometry compared with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
المؤلفون: Manios Y; From the 1Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece; and 2Laboratory of Body Composition, Department of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Technological Educational Institute of Crete, 72 300, Sitia, Greece., Kanellakis S, Moschonis G, Pipidis I, Skoufas E, Zafiropulos V
المصدر: Menopause (New York, N.Y.) [Menopause] 2013 Dec; Vol. 20 (12), pp. 1280-3.
نوع المنشور: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Validation Study
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Lippincott-Raven Publishers Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9433353 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1530-0374 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10723714 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Menopause Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Hagerstown, MD : Lippincott-Raven Publishers
Original Publication: New York, NY : Raven Press, c1994-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Adiposity* , Postmenopause*, Absorptiometry, Photon/*methods , Anthropometry/*methods , Intra-Abdominal Fat/*anatomy & histology, Electric Impedance ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Regression Analysis ; Reproducibility of Results
مستخلص: Objective: Since abdominal adiposity has been associated with increased risk for chronic diseases, valid and low cost methods to estimate it are needed for clinical and research purposes. The aim of the current study was to develop and validate, using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as reference method, a model that estimates abdominal fat mass percentage (AFM%) in white postmenopausal women based on simple and easy-to-apply anthropometric measurements. An additional aim was to validate an abdominal bioelectrical impedance analyzer (ViScan) for estimating waist circumference (WC) and AFM% in this group.
Methods: Ninety-one postmenopausal women (mean age, 61.5 y) with body mass index ranging from 20.9 to 42 kg/m2 were randomly divided into one training set (n = 60) and one testing set (n = 31) to develop and validate a model based on anthropometric measurements estimating abdominal fat mass. Furthermore, in all 91 participants, ViScan estimations of WC and AFM% were validated against tape measurement and DXA results.
Results: The model developed was AFM% = 4.496 + (0.318 × WC) + 0.342 × suprailiac skinfold (r = 0.834, P < 0.0001). The model had no significant bias (0.25%) and ± 7.5% limits of agreement. ViScan significantly overestimated WC by 7.04 cm and estimated AFM% with no significant bias (-0.13%) and ± 7.6% limits of agreement.
Conclusions: Both the model and ViScan are equally valid against DXA in estimating AFM%. However, ViScan is not valid in estimating WC in white postmenopausal women.
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20130517 Date Completed: 20140714 Latest Revision: 20191210
رمز التحديث: 20240513
DOI: 10.1097/GME.0b013e31828f5cd8
PMID: 23676630
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1530-0374
DOI:10.1097/GME.0b013e31828f5cd8