دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Primary total hip arthroplasty versus internal fixation in displaced fracture of femoral neck in sexa- and septuagenarians.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Primary total hip arthroplasty versus internal fixation in displaced fracture of femoral neck in sexa- and septuagenarians.
المؤلفون: Wani IH; Government Hospital for Bone and Joint Surgery Barzulla Srinagar Kashmir, Srinagar, 190005, Jammu and Kashmir, India, drihwani@yahoo.co.in., Sharma S, Latoo I, Salaria AQ, Farooq M, Jan M
المصدر: Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology [J Orthop Traumatol] 2014 Sep; Vol. 15 (3), pp. 209-14. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Jan 03.
نوع المنشور: Comparative Study; Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Springer-Verlag Italia Country of Publication: Italy NLM ID: 101090931 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1590-9999 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15909921 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Orthop Traumatol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Milano, Italy : Springer-Verlag Italia,
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip* , Fracture Fixation, Internal*, Femoral Neck Fractures/*surgery , Fractures, Ununited/*epidemiology , Osteonecrosis/*epidemiology, Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Recovery of Function ; Treatment Outcome
مستخلص: Background: The optimal treatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly patient is still under debate. In patients aged 60-80 years, the decision between internal fixation and arthroplasty remains controversial. The primary aim of the present study is to evaluate the functional outcome of patients aged 60-80 years with femoral neck fracture treated with total hip arthroplasty or closed reduction and internal fixation. The secondary aim is to evaluate the incidence of nonunion and avascular necrosis in femoral neck fracture in different age groups.
Materials and Methods: We studied 100 patients affected by displaced fracture of the femoral neck from May 2007 through June 2010. There were 60 men and 40 women with mean age of 66 years. Fifty patients were treated with closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws (group A), and the other 50 patients with total hip arthroplasty (group B). Mean surgical time, blood loss, duration of hospital stay, Harris hip score, complications, and need for reoperation were recorded.
Results: Harris hip score was significantly higher in group B at 3-, 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-up evaluation. The overall complication rate was 28 % in group A and 32 % in group B, which was not statistically significant. A statistically significant difference was found regarding patients who required reoperation in group A (20 %) compared with group B (no one). The average Harris hip score in the internal fixation group was 90.6 and in the total hip arthroplasty group was 93.7, which was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Our study showed an increased risk for intracapsular hip fracture developing nonunion with older age.
Conclusions: Primary total hip arthroplasty compared with internal fixation appears to be a reasonably safe method of treating displaced fracture of femoral neck in elderly patients. We also concluded that outcome regarding hip function is generally better after total hip arthroplasty compared with internal fixation.
Level of Evidence: Level II-Prospective cohort study.
References: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Apr;85(3):380-8. (PMID: 12729114)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 May;(218):68-74. (PMID: 3568498)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Jan;80(1):70-5. (PMID: 9469311)
Injury. 1992;23(8):521-4. (PMID: 1286902)
Injury. 2007 Sep;38 Suppl 3:S49-52. (PMID: 17723792)
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1997 Sep;26(9):621-7. (PMID: 9316725)
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985 Mar;67(2):214-7. (PMID: 3980528)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Feb;88(2):249-60. (PMID: 16452734)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969 Jun;51(4):737-55. (PMID: 5783851)
Br J Surg. 1979 Jan;66(1):56-60. (PMID: 369644)
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982;64(1):17-9. (PMID: 7068713)
Injury. 2007 Jul;38(7):797-805. (PMID: 17544427)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Oct;60(7):930-4. (PMID: 701341)
Injury. 2007 Sep;38 Suppl 3:S24-34. (PMID: 17723789)
Lancet. 1999 Mar 13;353(9156):878-82. (PMID: 10093980)
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 2003 Apr;74(309):1-42. (PMID: 12811943)
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988 Aug;70(4):639-43. (PMID: 3403615)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Dec;466(12):3116-22. (PMID: 18648899)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Apr;84(4):562-72. (PMID: 11940616)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Mar;(348):59-66. (PMID: 9553534)
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Mar;84(2):183-8. (PMID: 11922358)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Aug;87(8):1680-8. (PMID: 16085605)
Acta Orthop Scand. 2000 Dec;71(6):597-602. (PMID: 11145387)
J Surg Res. 2011 Jan;165(1):68-74. (PMID: 19552922)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Sep;87(9):2122-30. (PMID: 16140828)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Sep;85(9):1673-81. (PMID: 12954824)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec;(429):43-8. (PMID: 15577464)
BMJ. 2007 Dec 15;335(7632):1251-4. (PMID: 18056740)
Injury. 2007 Jul;38(7):780-4. (PMID: 17054955)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jan;442:239-44. (PMID: 16394767)
J Orthop Trauma. 1995 Jun;9(3):215-21. (PMID: 7623173)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20140104 Date Completed: 20150617 Latest Revision: 20220331
رمز التحديث: 20221213
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC4182619
DOI: 10.1007/s10195-013-0278-3
PMID: 24385140
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1590-9999
DOI:10.1007/s10195-013-0278-3