دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial activity of miswak, propolis, sodium hypochlorite and saline as root canal irrigants by microbial culturing and quantification in chronically exposed primary teeth.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial activity of miswak, propolis, sodium hypochlorite and saline as root canal irrigants by microbial culturing and quantification in chronically exposed primary teeth.
المؤلفون: Shingare P; MDS, Senior Lecturer, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, M.G.M Dental College and Hospital, Kamothe, Navi Mumbai-400703, Maharashtra, India;, Chaugule V; MDS, Professor and Head of Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Pimpri, Pune 411018, Maharashtra, India.
المصدر: Germs [Germs] 2011 Dec 24; Vol. 1 (1), pp. 12-21. Date of Electronic Publication: 2011 Dec 24 (Print Publication: 2011).
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: European Academy of HIV/AIDS and Infectious Diseases Country of Publication: Romania NLM ID: 101596099 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 2248-2997 (Print) Linking ISSN: 22482997 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Germs Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Bucureşti : European Academy of HIV/AIDS and Infectious Diseases
مستخلص: Introduction: One of the essential factors for successful root canal therapy is elimination of bacterial contaminants using an effective root canal chemical irrigant such as sodium hypochlorite which inherently possesses certain disadvantages like irritation to periapical tissues, staining of the instruments, burning of surrounding tissues etc. The aim of the study was to explore newer irrigant agents which would probably be as effective or more and at the same time less irritating to the tissues than sodium hypochlorite. Our search included two such agents, propolis and miswak.
Methods: The study was performed on 40 infected primary teeth (20 male and 20 female patients). The subjects were divided into 4 groups of 10 children. Group 1 received 3% sodium hypochlorite as irrigating solution, group 2 received 12.5% alcoholic extract of miswak, group 3 received 11% alcoholic extract of propolis and group 4, 0.9% saline. We used the antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite as gold standard for comparing the activities of both propolis and miswak. We collected pre- and post-irrigation samples using sterile paper points. Samples were cultured on tryptose soya agar at a temperature of 37(o)C for 24-48 hours. The colonies were counted with a digital colony counter. For the statistical analysis, we used the unpaired t test at level of significance 0.05 and the ANOVA test for analysis of variance.
Results: The differences in pre- and post- irrigation values were calculated for each group, the greatest difference being seen in group 1 (95.549%) followed by group 2 (89.794%), group 3 (34.735%) and group 4 (28.087%). When comparing the results between groups, there was no statistically significant difference between groups 3 and 4.
Conclusions: The statistically analyzed results suggested that miswak could be a good natural substitute to sodium hypochlorite, while propolis showed results comparable to those of the negative control.
التعليقات: Erratum in: Germs. 2013 Jun;3(2):67.
References: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994 Nov;78(5):634-45. (PMID: 7838473)
J Med Microbiol. 1987 Feb;23(1):55-60. (PMID: 3820271)
Clin Prev Dent. 1983 Jul-Aug;5(4):11-4. (PMID: 6607809)
J Endod. 1998 Jul;24(7):472-6. (PMID: 9693573)
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1972 Sep;34(3):486-97. (PMID: 4558807)
Odontol Revy. 1966;17(3):216-21. (PMID: 5332929)
Microbios. 1994;80(323):107-13. (PMID: 7898373)
Endod Dent Traumatol. 1993 Jun;9(3):95-100. (PMID: 8243347)
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973 Dec;36(6):856-71. (PMID: 4208832)
Endod Dent Traumatol. 1993 Dec;9(6):243-8. (PMID: 8143575)
J Am Dent Assoc. 1958 Oct;57(4):471-6. (PMID: 13575076)
J Endod. 1999 Mar;25(3):167-71. (PMID: 10321180)
Scand J Dent Res. 1981 Aug;89(4):321-8. (PMID: 6947391)
Braz Dent J. 2008;19(4):301-5. (PMID: 19180318)
J Pak Med Assoc. 1981 Apr;31(4):89-95. (PMID: 6785501)
J Endod. 1975 Apr;1(4):127-35. (PMID: 765422)
J Endod. 1994 May;20(5):233-5. (PMID: 7931014)
J Endod. 1976 Dec;2(12):369-73. (PMID: 1069828)
Int Dent J. 1995 Jun;45(3):218-22. (PMID: 7558361)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Irrigants; antimicrobial activity; miswak; propolis; sodium hypochlorite
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20140117 Date Completed: 20140116 Latest Revision: 20220311
رمز التحديث: 20231215
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC3882825
DOI: 10.11599/germs.2012.1004
PMID: 24432254
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2248-2997
DOI:10.11599/germs.2012.1004