دورية أكاديمية
Critical Evaluation of Risk Factors and Early Complications in 564 Consecutive Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstructions Using Acellular Dermal Matrix at a Single Center.
| العنوان: | Critical Evaluation of Risk Factors and Early Complications in 564 Consecutive Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstructions Using Acellular Dermal Matrix at a Single Center. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Selber JC; Houston, Texas From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center., Wren JH, Garvey PB, Zhang H, Erickson C, Clemens MW, Butler CE |
| المصدر: | Plastic and reconstructive surgery [Plast Reconstr Surg] 2015 Jul; Vol. 136 (1), pp. 10-20. |
| نوع المنشور: | Evaluation Study; Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 1306050 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1529-4242 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00321052 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Plast Reconstr Surg Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: Original Publication: Baltimore : Williams & Wilkins, |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Acellular Dermis/*adverse effects , Breast Implantation/*methods , Postoperative Complications/*etiology, Adult ; Animals ; Breast Neoplasms/surgery ; Cattle ; Device Removal/statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors |
| مستخلص: | Background: Acellular dermal matrix for implant-based breast reconstruction appears to cause higher early complication rates, but long-term outcomes are perceived to be superior. This dichotomy is the subject of considerable debate. The authors hypothesized that patient characteristics and operative variables would have a greater impact on complications than the type of acellular dermal matrix used. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed of consecutive patients who underwent two-stage, implant-based breast reconstruction with human cadaveric or bovine acellular dermal matrix from 2006 to 2012 at a single institution. Patient characteristics and operative variables were analyzed using logistic regression analyses to identify risk factors for complications. Results: The authors included 564 reconstructions in the study. Radiation therapy and obesity increased the odds of all complications. Every 100-ml increase in preoperative breast volume increased the odds of any complication by 1 percent, the odds of infection by 27 percent, and the risk of explantation by 16 percent. The odds of seroma increased linearly with increasing surface area of acellular dermal matrix. Odds of infection were higher with an intraoperative expander fill volume greater than 50 percent of the total volume. Risk of explantation was twice as high when intraoperative expander fill volume was greater than 300 ml. Conclusions: Radiation therapy, obesity, larger breasts, higher intraoperative fill volumes, and larger acellular dermal matrices are all independent risk factors for early complications. Maximizing the initial mastectomy skin envelope fill must be balanced with the understanding that higher complication rates may result from a larger intraoperative breast mound. Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Risk, III. |
| References: | Slavin SA, Lin SJ. The use of acellular dermal matrices in revisional breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(Suppl 2):70S–85S. Maxwell GP, Gabriel A. Use of the acellular dermal matrix in revisionary aesthetic breast surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2009;29:485–493. Basu CB, Jeffers L. The role of acellular dermal matrices in capsular contracture: A review of the evidence. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(Suppl 2):118S–124S. Bengtson B. Acellular dermal matrices in secondary aesthetic breast surgery: Indications, techniques, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(Suppl 2):142S–156S. Kim JYS, Connor CM. Focus on technique: Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(Suppl 2):104S–115S. Sbitany H, Serletti JM. Acellular dermis–assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: A systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1162–1169. Ho G, Nguyen TJ, Shahabi A, Hwang BH, Chan LS, Wong AK. A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:346–356. Israeli R. Complications of acellular dermal matrices in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(Suppl 2):159S–172S. Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:429–436. Kim JY, Davila AA, Persing S, et al. A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:28–41. Gurunluoglu R, Gurunluoglu A, Williams SA, Tebockhorst S. Current trends in breast reconstruction: Survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010. Ann Plastic Surg. 2013;70:103–110. Weichman KE, Wilson SC, Weinstein AL, et al. The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:1049–1058. Parks JW, Hammond SE, Walsh WA, Adams RL, Chandler RG, Luce EA. Human acellular dermis versus no acellular dermis in tissue expansion breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:739–746. Pannucci CJ, Antony AK, Wilkins EG. The impact of acellular dermal matrix on tissue expander/implant loss in breast reconstruction: An analysis of the tracking outcomes and operations in plastic surgery database. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:1–10. Antony AK, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, et al. Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: Determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1606–1614. Liu AS, Kao HK, Reish RG, et al. Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1755–1762. Berry T, Brooks S, Sydow N, et al. Complication rates of radiation on tissue expander and autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:202–210. McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Riedel E, et al. Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: An outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1886–1892. Davies K, Allan L, Roblin P, Ross D, Farhadi J. Factors affecting post-operative complications following skin sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Breast. 2011;20:21–25. Lanier ST, Wang ED, Chen JJ, et al. The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:674–678. Hultman SC, Daiza S. Skin-sparing mastectomy flap complications after breast reconstruction: Review of incidence, management, and outcome. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:249–255. Margulies AG, Hochberg J, Kepple J, Henry-Tillman RS, Westbrook K, Klimberg VS. Total skin-sparing mastectomy without preservation of the nipple-areola complex. Am J Surg. 2005;190:920–926. Woerdeman LA, Hage JJ, Hofland MM, Rutgers EJ. A prospective assessment of surgical risk factors in 400 cases of skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implants to establish selection criteria. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:455–463. Meretoja TJ, von Smitten KA, Kuokkanen HO, Suominen SH, Jahkola TA. Complications of skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction: A prospective randomized study comparing high-frequency radiosurgery with conventional diathermy. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60:24–28. Garwood ER, Moore D, Ewing C, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy: Complications and local recurrence rates in 2 cohorts of patients. Ann Surg. 2009;249:26–32. Rao R, Saint-Cyr M, Ma AM, et al. Prediction of post-operative necrosis after mastectomy: A pilot study utilizing optical diffusion imaging spectroscopy. World J Surg Oncol. 2009;7:91. Newman MI, Samson MC, Tamburrino JF, Swartz KA. Intraoperative laser-assisted indocyanine green angiography for the evaluation of mastectomy flaps in immediate breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2010;26:487–492. Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, Medford-Davis L, Hertl C, Austen WG Jr. Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: Indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1170–1178. Komorowska-Timek E, Gurtner GC. Intraoperative perfusion mapping with laser-assisted indocyanine green imaging can predict and prevent complications in immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1065–1073. Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:429–436. Newman MI, Swartz KA, Samson MC, Mahoney CB, Diab K. The true incidence of near-term postoperative complications in prosthetic breast reconstruction utilizing human acellular dermal matrices: A meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011;35:100–106. Garvey PB, Villa MT, Rozanski AT, Liu J, Robb GL, Beahm EK. The advantages of free abdominal-based flaps over implants for breast reconstruction in obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:991–1000. Jordan SW, Khavanin N, Fine NA, Kim JY. An algorithmic approach for selective acellular dermal matrix use in immediate two-stage breast reconstruction: Indications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:178–188. |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20150626 Date Completed: 20150907 Latest Revision: 20220321 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20231215 |
| DOI: | 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001327 |
| PMID: | 26111310 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1529-4242 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001327 |