دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

National trends in utilization and outcome of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for traumatic thoracic aortic injuries.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: National trends in utilization and outcome of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for traumatic thoracic aortic injuries.
المؤلفون: Ultee KH; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands., Soden PA; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., Chien V; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., Bensley RP; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., Zettervall SL; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., Verhagen HJ; Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands., Schermerhorn ML; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. Electronic address: mscherm@bidmc.harvard.edu.
المصدر: Journal of vascular surgery [J Vasc Surg] 2016 May; Vol. 63 (5), pp. 1232-1239.e1. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jan 06.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Elsevier Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8407742 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1097-6809 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 07415214 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Vasc Surg Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: <2008-> : New York, NY : Elsevier
Original Publication: St. Louis, Mo. : Mosby, [c1984-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Aorta, Thoracic/*surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/*trends , Endovascular Procedures/*trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/*trends , Thoracic Injuries/*surgery , Vascular System Injuries/*surgery , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/*surgery, Adult ; Aorta, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging ; Aorta, Thoracic/injuries ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/statistics & numerical data ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Databases, Factual ; Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects ; Endovascular Procedures/mortality ; Endovascular Procedures/statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Hospital Mortality/trends ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Odds Ratio ; Risk Factors ; Thoracic Injuries/diagnostic imaging ; Thoracic Injuries/mortality ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; United States ; Vascular System Injuries/diagnostic imaging ; Vascular System Injuries/mortality ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating/mortality ; Young Adult
مستخلص: Background: Endovascular repair of traumatic thoracic aortic injuries (TTAI) is an alternative to conventional open surgical repair. Single-institution studies have shown a survival benefit with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), but whether this is being realized nationally is not clear. The purpose of our study was to document trends in the increase in use of TEVAR and its effect on outcomes of TTAI nationally.
Methods: Patients admitted with a TTAI between 2005 and 2011 were identified in the National Inpatient Sample. Patients were grouped by treatment into TEVAR, open repair, or nonoperative management. Primary outcomes were relative use over time and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and length of stay. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of mortality.
Results: Included were 8384 patients, with 2492 (29.7%) undergoing TEVAR, 848 (10.1%) open repair, and 5044 (60.2%) managed nonoperatively. TEVAR became the dominant treatment option for TTAI during the study period, starting at 6.5% of interventions in 2005 and accounting for 86.5% of interventions in 2011 (P < .001). Nonoperative management declined concurrently with the widespread of adoption TEVAR (79.8% to 53.7%; P < .001). In-hospital mortality after TEVAR decreased during the study period from 33.3% in 2005 to 4.9% in 2011 (P < .001), and an increase in mortality was observed for open repair from 13.9% to 19.2% (P < .001). Procedural mortality (TEVAR or open repair) decreased from 14.9% to 6.7% (P < .001), and mortality after any TTAI admission declined from 24.5% to 13.3% during the study period (P < .001). In addition to lower mortality, TEVAR was followed by fewer cardiac complications (4.1% vs 8.5%; P < .001), respiratory complications (47.5% vs 54.8%; P < .001), and shorter length of stay (18.4 vs 20.2 days; P = .012) compared with open repair. In adjusted mortality analyses, open repair proved to be associated with twice the mortality risk compared with TEVAR (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-2.7), and nonoperative management was associated with more than a fourfold increase in mortality (odds ratio, 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 3.8-5.3).
Conclusions: TEVAR is now the dominant surgical approach in TTAI, with substantial perioperative morbidity and mortality benefits over open aortic repair. Overall mortality after admission for TTAI has declined, which is most likely the result of the replacement of open repair by TEVAR as well as the broadened eligibility for operative repair.
(Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
References: J Trauma. 2001 Aug;51(2):346-51. (PMID: 11493798)
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002 Oct;13(10):1037-41. (PMID: 12397126)
Surg Clin North Am. 1989 Feb;69(1):15-9. (PMID: 2911786)
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990 Nov;100(5):652-60; discussion 660-1. (PMID: 2232829)
J Trauma. 1997 Mar;42(3):374-80; discussion 380-3. (PMID: 9095103)
Radiology. 1997 Dec;205(3):657-62. (PMID: 9393517)
Circulation. 1958 Jun;17(6):1086-101. (PMID: 13547374)
Br J Surg. 2007 Apr;94(4):395-403. (PMID: 17380547)
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Aug;46(2):218-22. (PMID: 17600665)
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Mar;47(3):671-5. (PMID: 17980541)
J Trauma. 2008 Mar;64(3):561-70; discussion 570-1. (PMID: 18332794)
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 Apr;19(4):479-86. (PMID: 18375289)
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Nov;48(5):1343-51. (PMID: 18632242)
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jan;53(1):36-42; discussion 43. (PMID: 20961728)
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jan;53(1):187-92. (PMID: 20974523)
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Mar;53(3):615-20; discussion 621. (PMID: 21147516)
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 2;364(22):2128-37. (PMID: 21631325)
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1298-302; discussion 1302. (PMID: 21784605)
Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):973-81. (PMID: 23095667)
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jan;57(1):108-14; discussion 115. (PMID: 23141678)
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Mar;145(3 Suppl):S154-8. (PMID: 23260456)
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Apr;57(4):899-905.e1. (PMID: 23384495)
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jun;216(6):1110-5. (PMID: 23490544)
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Aug;58(2):412-9. (PMID: 23490294)
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Aug;58(2):380-5. (PMID: 23756339)
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Sep;58(3):832-5. (PMID: 23643557)
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Jan;59(1):32-8.e1. (PMID: 23993438)
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Mar;149(3):825-9. (PMID: 25481655)
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jun;61(6):1624-34. (PMID: 25769389)
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Oct;50(4):460-5. (PMID: 26143100)
معلومات مُعتمدة: R01 HL105453 United States HL NHLBI NIH HHS; T32 HL007734 United States HL NHLBI NIH HHS
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20160119 Date Completed: 20170509 Latest Revision: 20181202
رمز التحديث: 20221213
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC4844787
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.11.034
PMID: 26776898
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1097-6809
DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.11.034