دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Neural signatures of trust in reciprocity: A coordinate-based meta-analysis.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Neural signatures of trust in reciprocity: A coordinate-based meta-analysis.
المؤلفون: Bellucci G; Department of Psychology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany., Chernyak SV; Molecular Neuroscience Department, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia., Goodyear K; Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.; Section on Clinical Psychoneuroendocrinology and Neuropsychopharmacology, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism and National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, Maryland., Eickhoff SB; Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany.; Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany., Krueger F; Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.
المصدر: Human brain mapping [Hum Brain Mapp] 2017 Mar; Vol. 38 (3), pp. 1233-1248. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Nov 17.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9419065 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1097-0193 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10659471 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Hum Brain Mapp Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: New York : Wiley
Original Publication: New York : Wiley-Liss, c1993-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Brain Mapping*, Brain/*physiology , Feedback, Psychological/*physiology , Trust/*psychology, Algorithms ; Databases, Bibliographic/statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Likelihood Functions ; Male
مستخلص: Trust in reciprocity (TR) is defined as the risky decision to invest valued resources in another party with the hope of mutual benefit. Several fMRI studies have investigated the neural correlates of TR in one-shot and multiround versions of the investment game (IG). However, an overall characterization of the underlying neural networks remains elusive. Here, a coordinate-based meta-analysis was employed (activation likelihood estimation method, 30 articles) to investigate consistent brain activations in each of the IG stages (i.e., the trust, reciprocity and feedback stage). Results showed consistent activations in the anterior insula (AI) during trust decisions in the one-shot IG and decisions to reciprocate in the multiround IG, likely related to representations of aversive feelings. Moreover, decisions to reciprocate also consistently engaged the intraparietal sulcus, probably involved in evaluations of the reciprocity options. On the contrary, trust decisions in the multiround IG consistently activated the ventral striatum, likely associated with reward prediction error signals. Finally, the dorsal striatum was found consistently recruited during the feedback stage of the multiround IG, likely related to reinforcement learning. In conclusion, our results indicate different neural networks underlying trust, reciprocity, and feedback learning. These findings suggest that although decisions to trust and reciprocate may elicit aversive feelings likely evoked by the uncertainty about the decision outcomes and the pressing requirements of social standards, multiple interactions allow people to build interpersonal trust for cooperation via a learning mechanism by which they arguably learn to distinguish trustworthy from untrustworthy partners. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1233-1248, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
(© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)
References: J Neurosci. 2013 Feb 20;33(8):3602-11. (PMID: 23426687)
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Sep;6(4):507-15. (PMID: 20802090)
Nature. 2006 Aug 31;442(7106):1042-5. (PMID: 16929307)
Cereb Cortex. 2012 Apr;22(4):951-61. (PMID: 21725038)
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):487-506. (PMID: 20957581)
Science. 2004 Oct 15;306(5695):503-7. (PMID: 15486304)
Science. 2005 Apr 1;308(5718):78-83. (PMID: 15802598)
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004 Dec;14(6):769-76. (PMID: 15582382)
Neuron. 2004 Feb 19;41(4):653-62. (PMID: 14980212)
Neuron. 2002 Jul 18;35(2):395-405. (PMID: 12160756)
Neuron. 2004 May 13;42(3):509-17. (PMID: 15134646)
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(12):e1002841. (PMID: 23300423)
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Oct;7(10):1048-54. (PMID: 15452576)
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 19;281(1782):20132127. (PMID: 24648217)
Science. 2004 Apr 16;304(5669):452-4. (PMID: 15087550)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):20084-9. (PMID: 18056800)
Neuron. 2009 Dec 10;64(5):756-70. (PMID: 20005830)
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jan;9(1):133-9. (PMID: 16327783)
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2349-61. (PMID: 21963913)
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Dec;8(8):887-96. (PMID: 22956669)
Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Sep;32(9):1419-31. (PMID: 20715080)
Neuroreport. 2004 Nov 15;15(16):2539-43. (PMID: 15538191)
J Comp Neurol. 2005 Dec 5;493(1):154-66. (PMID: 16254997)
Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 1;35(2):881-903. (PMID: 17296315)
Science. 2007 Oct 26;318(5850):598-602. (PMID: 17962552)
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 20;8(6):e68884. (PMID: 23922638)
Science. 2004 Aug 27;305(5688):1254-8. (PMID: 15333831)
Exp Brain Res. 1991;85(3):491-500. (PMID: 1915708)
Neurosci Lett. 2008 Jan 10;430(2):92-7. (PMID: 18079060)
Brain Cogn. 2013 Jun;82(1):108-16. (PMID: 23548839)
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Feb;3(2):184-90. (PMID: 10649575)
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 01;10(9):e0137014. (PMID: 26325581)
Neuron. 2002 Feb 28;33(5):815-26. (PMID: 11879657)
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Aug 02;6:213. (PMID: 22876226)
Neuroimage. 2007 Aug 15;37(2):652-62. (PMID: 17588776)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Oct;11(10):419-27. (PMID: 17913566)
Science. 1999 May 7;284(5416):970-4. (PMID: 10320379)
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003 Aug;13(4):500-5. (PMID: 12965300)
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):159-65. (PMID: 18639633)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 29;106(39):16835-40. (PMID: 19805382)
Brain. 2013 Jun;136(Pt 6):1968-75. (PMID: 23611807)
Brain Cogn. 2015 Aug;98:53-64. (PMID: 26093237)
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;22(1):60-70. (PMID: 21164174)
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Apr;9(4):395-402. (PMID: 23202661)
Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 May;25(1):6-21. (PMID: 15846823)
Science. 2003 Jun 13;300(5626):1755-8. (PMID: 12805551)
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000 Dec;1(3):199-207. (PMID: 11257908)
Nature. 2006 Jan 26;439(7075):466-9. (PMID: 16421576)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jun;15(6):254-62. (PMID: 21592844)
J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 25;35(8):3412-9. (PMID: 25716841)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11832-5. (PMID: 11562505)
J Neurosci. 2008 Mar 12;28(11):2745-52. (PMID: 18337404)
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Nov;8(11):1611-8. (PMID: 16222226)
Neuroimage. 2002 Jul;16(3 Pt 1):765-80. (PMID: 12169260)
Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:569-98. (PMID: 15012464)
Neuroimage. 2007 Jul 1;36(3):511-21. (PMID: 17499520)
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Feb;5(2):97-8. (PMID: 11802175)
Neuron. 2008 May 22;58(4):639-50. (PMID: 18498743)
Front Psychol. 2016 May 18;7:728. (PMID: 27242633)
Trends Neurosci. 1998 Aug;21(8):355-61. (PMID: 9720604)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 17;103(42):15623-8. (PMID: 17030808)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 1;111(13):5000-5. (PMID: 24639493)
Neuron. 2007 Oct 4;56(1):185-96. (PMID: 17920024)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 12;113(28):7900-5. (PMID: 27357684)
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jan;10(1):126-31. (PMID: 17187065)
Neuroimage. 2013 Aug 1;76:412-27. (PMID: 23507394)
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Sep;30(9):2907-26. (PMID: 19172646)
Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):339-47. (PMID: 18399886)
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009 Sep;4(3):294-304. (PMID: 19304843)
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Dec 12;363(1511):3859-74. (PMID: 18829425)
Neuroimage. 2007 Jul 1;36(3):532-42. (PMID: 17499525)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 20;107(29):13099-104. (PMID: 20615982)
Neuron. 2004 Jan 22;41(2):281-92. (PMID: 14741108)
Nat Commun. 2016 Mar 18;7:10904. (PMID: 26988654)
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Sep;5(9):900-4. (PMID: 12145636)
Nature. 2003 Oct 23;425(6960):785-91. (PMID: 14574401)
Psychol Bull. 2013 Jul;139(4):870-900. (PMID: 23163491)
Neuroimage. 2004 Mar;21(3):984-90. (PMID: 15006665)
Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Jan;33(1):1-13. (PMID: 21305667)
Neuroimage. 2005 Apr 15;25(3):653-60. (PMID: 15808966)
Neuroreport. 2009 Jul 15;20(11):984-9. (PMID: 19521264)
J Neurosci. 2015 May 27;35(21):8170-80. (PMID: 26019333)
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Sep;68:256-269. (PMID: 27211526)
J Neurosci. 2010 Apr 21;30(16):5498-507. (PMID: 20410103)
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Mar;101(3):1507-23. (PMID: 19164109)
Neuroimage. 2016 Aug 15;137:70-85. (PMID: 27179606)
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 5;367(1589):744-53. (PMID: 22271789)
Science. 1997 Mar 14;275(5306):1593-9. (PMID: 9054347)
Nature. 1999 Jul 15;400(6741):233-8. (PMID: 10421364)
Psychol Med. 2014 Dec;44(16):3445-54. (PMID: 25065732)
Neuroimage. 2007 Jan 15;34(2):848-58. (PMID: 17112750)
Neuron. 2011 May 12;70(3):560-72. (PMID: 21555080)
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Aug;3(8):655-66. (PMID: 12154366)
Front Neurosci. 2012 Oct 16;6:148. (PMID: 23087604)
J Neurosci. 2007 Aug 1;27(31):8161-5. (PMID: 17670959)
Science. 2008 Aug 8;321(5890):806-10. (PMID: 18687957)
Neuroimage. 2003 Aug;19(4):1439-48. (PMID: 12948701)
Brain Res. 1995 Sep 25;693(1-2):21-30. (PMID: 8653411)
معلومات مُعتمدة: R01 MH074457 United States MH NIMH NIH HHS; R56 MH074457 United States MH NIMH NIH HHS; T32 AA007459 United States AA NIAAA NIH HHS
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: activation likelihood estimation; fMRI; investment game; meta-analysis; reciprocity; social cognition; trust; trust game
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20161119 Date Completed: 20180213 Latest Revision: 20220409
رمز التحديث: 20240628
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC5441232
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23451
PMID: 27859899
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1097-0193
DOI:10.1002/hbm.23451