دورية أكاديمية
An undergraduate Otolaryngology curriculum comparison in the United Kingdom using a curriculum evaluation framework.
| العنوان: | An undergraduate Otolaryngology curriculum comparison in the United Kingdom using a curriculum evaluation framework. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Steven RA; Department of Otolaryngology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK., Mires GJ; School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK., Lloyd SKW; Department of ENT, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK., McAleer S; Centre for Medical Education, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. |
| المصدر: | Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery [Clin Otolaryngol] 2017 Oct; Vol. 42 (5), pp. 963-968. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jan 20. |
| نوع المنشور: | Comparative Study; Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Blackwell Scientific Publications Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101247023 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1749-4486 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17494478 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Clin Otolaryngol Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: Oxford : Blackwell Scientific Publications, c2005- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Curriculum* , Education, Medical, Undergraduate*, Otolaryngology/*education, Clinical Competence ; Humans ; Schools, Medical ; United Kingdom |
| مستخلص: | Objective: To compare undergraduate otolaryngology curricula in the United Kingdom. To develop a tool which would allow undergraduate specialty curricula to be compared. Design: Development of a curriculum evaluation framework (CEF) and survey. Setting: UK medical schools. Participants: Otolaryngology curricula were requested from all 32 UK medical schools who award a primary medical qualification. Nineteen curricula were received and examined. Main Outcome Measures: Thematic and content analysis of curriculum documents were undertaken. Outcome measures include an examination of curriculum content and methods, type of assessment and alignment of curricula with the General Medical Council's Tomorrow's Doctors document. Results: Learning objectives were listed by 18 of the 19 medical schools who responded. The most commonly included theme was clinical conditions (100%). Psychosocial aspects of otolaryngology was the least covered theme (37%). Examination skills was covered by the majority (74%). Outpatient clinics and theatre attendance were the most commonly utilised teaching methods (47%). Student checklists were the most common form of assessment (32%). Only four medical schools linked their curricula to the GMC's Tomorrow's Doctors document. Conclusions: The development of a CEF allowed for a systematic comparison of curricula. This study, evaluating otolaryngology curricula, has highlighted the variability of curricula from both a content and methods perspective in the UK. The study provides those involved with curriculum planning an overview of the main themes currently taught in the UK and offers examples of individual topics. It also offers an insight into the way in which otolaryngology is taught in the UK. (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.) |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20170105 Date Completed: 20180621 Latest Revision: 20180621 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240628 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/coa.12824 |
| PMID: | 28052572 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1749-4486 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1111/coa.12824 |