| المؤلفون: |
Asher AL; Department of Neurological Surgery, Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, and Neurological Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, North Carolina., Devin CJ; Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt Spine Center., Archer KR; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt Spine Center, and.; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee., Chotai S; Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt Spine Center., Parker SL; Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt Spine Center., Bydon M; Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota., Nian H; Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee., Harrell FE Jr; Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee., Speroff T; Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Health System, Veterans Health Administration, Nashville, Tennessee.; Departments of Medicine and Biostatistics, Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee., Dittus RS; Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Health System, Veterans Health Administration, Nashville, Tennessee.; Departments of Medicine and Biostatistics, Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee., Philips SE; Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee., Shaffrey CI; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia; and., Foley KT; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Semmes-Murphey Neurologic & Spine Institute, Memphis, Tennessee., McGirt MJ; Department of Neurological Surgery, Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, and Neurological Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, North Carolina. |
| مستخلص: |
OBJECTIVE Current costs associated with spine care are unsustainable. Productivity loss and time away from work for patients who were once gainfully employed contributes greatly to the financial burden experienced by individuals and, more broadly, society. Therefore, it is vital to identify the factors associated with return to work (RTW) after lumbar spine surgery. In this analysis, the authors used data from a national prospective outcomes registry to create a predictive model of patients' ability to RTW after undergoing lumbar spine surgery for degenerative spine disease. METHODS Data from 4694 patients who underwent elective spine surgery for degenerative lumbar disease, who had been employed preoperatively, and who had completed a 3-month follow-up evaluation, were entered into a prospective, multicenter registry. Patient-reported outcomes-Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), numeric rating scale (NRS) for back pain (BP) and leg pain (LP), and EQ-5D scores-were recorded at baseline and at 3 months postoperatively. The time to RTW was defined as the period between operation and date of returning to work. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model, including an array of preoperative factors, was fitted for RTW. The model performance was measured using the concordance index (c-index). RESULTS Eighty-two percent of patients (n = 3855) returned to work within 3 months postoperatively. The risk-adjusted predictors of a lower likelihood of RTW were being preoperatively employed but not working at the time of presentation, manual labor as an occupation, worker's compensation, liability insurance for disability, higher preoperative ODI score, higher preoperative NRS-BP score, and demographic factors such as female sex, African American race, history of diabetes, and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score. The likelihood of a RTW within 3 months was higher in patients with higher education level than in those with less than high school-level education. The c-index of the model's performance was 0.71. CONCLUSIONS This study presents a novel predictive model for the probability of returning to work after lumbar spine surgery. Spine care providers can use this model to educate patients and encourage them in shared decision-making regarding the RTW outcome. This evidence-based decision support will result in better communication between patients and clinicians and improve postoperative recovery expectations, which will ultimately increase the likelihood of a positive RTW trajectory. |
