دورية أكاديمية

The relationship between minute ventilation and end tidal CO2 in intubated and spontaneously breathing patients undergoing procedural sedation.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The relationship between minute ventilation and end tidal CO2 in intubated and spontaneously breathing patients undergoing procedural sedation.
المؤلفون: Mehta JH; Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America., Williams GW 2nd; Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America., Harvey BC; Respiratory Motion, Inc. Waltham, Massachusetts, United States of America., Grewal NK; Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America., George EE; Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
المصدر: PloS one [PLoS One] 2017 Jun 29; Vol. 12 (6), pp. e0180187. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jun 29 (Print Publication: 2017).
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Intubation, Intratracheal* , Tidal Volume*, Carbon Dioxide/*analysis , Hypnotics and Sedatives/*administration & dosage, Aged ; Anesthesia, General ; Capnography ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Respiratory Rate
مستخلص: Background: Monitoring respiratory status using end tidal CO2 (EtCO2), which reliably reflects arterial PaCO2 in intubated patients under general anesthesia, has often proven both inaccurate and inadequate when monitoring non-intubated and spontaneously breathing patients. This is particularly important in patients undergoing procedural sedation (e.g., endoscopy, colonoscopy). This can be undertaken in the operating theater, but is also often delivered outside the operating room by non-anesthesia providers. In this study we evaluated the ability for conventional EtCO2 monitoring to reflect changes in ventilation in non-intubated surgical patients undergoing monitored anesthesia care and compared and contrasted these findings to both intubated patients under general anesthesia and spontaneously breathing volunteers.
Methods: Minute Ventilation (MV), tidal volume (TV), and respiratory rate (RR) were continuously collected from an impedance-based Respiratory Volume Monitor (RVM) simultaneously with capnography data in 160 patients from three patient groups: non-intubated surgical patients managed using spinal anesthesia and Procedural Sedation (n = 58); intubated surgical patients under General Anesthesia (n = 54); and spontaneously breathing Awake Volunteers (n = 48). EtCO2 instrument sensitivity was calculated for each patient as the slope of a Deming regression between corresponding measurements of EtCO2 and MV and expressed as angle from the x-axis (θ). All data are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.
Results: While, as expected, EtCO2 and MV measurements were negatively correlated in most patients, we found gross systematic differences across the three cohorts. In the General Anesthesia patients, small changes in MV resulted in large changes in EtCO2 (high sensitivity, θ = -83.6 ± 9.9°). In contrast, in the Awake Volunteers patients, large changes in MV resulted in insignificant changes in EtCO2 (low sensitivity, θ = -24.7 ± 19.7°, p < 0.0001 vs General Anesthesia). In the Procedural Sedation patients, EtCO2 sensitivity showed a bimodal distribution, with an approximately even split between patients showing high EtCO2 instrument sensitivity, similar to those under General Anesthesia, and patients with low EtCO2 instrument sensitivity, similar to the Awake Volunteers.
Conclusions: When monitoring non-intubated patients undergoing procedural sedation, EtCO2 often provides inadequate instrument sensitivity when detecting changes in ventilation. This suggests that augmenting standard patient care with EtCO2 monitoring is a less than optimal solution for detecting changes in respiratory status in non-intubated patients. Instead, adding direct monitoring of MV with an RVM may be preferable for continuous assessment of adequacy of ventilation in non-intubated patients.
References: Can J Anaesth. 1992 Jul;39(6):617-32. (PMID: 1643689)
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 8;367(19):e27. (PMID: 23134404)
Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;27(9):1056-9. (PMID: 19931750)
Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Apr;9(4):275-80. (PMID: 11927449)
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Nov;81(5 Suppl 2 Proceedings of the 2015 Military Health System Researc):S162-S170. (PMID: 27270857)
Circulation. 2005 Dec 13;112(24 Suppl):IV1-203. (PMID: 16314375)
Emerg Med J. 2005 Jul;22(7):490-3. (PMID: 15983084)
Shock. 2013 Jun;39(6):495-500. (PMID: 23572088)
Anesth Analg. 2017 Jan;124(1):120-126. (PMID: 27384980)
Am J Emerg Med. 1998 Jul;16(4):350-2. (PMID: 9672448)
Arch Trauma Res. 2012 Summer;1(2):58-62. (PMID: 24396744)
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172750. (PMID: 28235069)
Crit Care Med. 1996 May;24(5):785-90. (PMID: 8706454)
Pediatrics. 2006 Jun;117(6):e1170-8. (PMID: 16702250)
Can J Anaesth. 1996 Aug;43(8):862-6. (PMID: 8840067)
Anesth Analg. 2013 Jul;117(1):91-100. (PMID: 23733842)
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;111(3):395-404. (PMID: 26902229)
J Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;45(1):130-5. (PMID: 23375221)
J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Feb;30(1):33-9. (PMID: 25735263)
Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jun;55(7):826-31. (PMID: 12024135)
J Clin Anesth. 2011 May;23(3):189-96. (PMID: 21497076)
BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):61. (PMID: 28446134)
J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Apr;29(2):223-30. (PMID: 25037938)
J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Feb;31(1):53-57. (PMID: 26628270)
Anesth Analg. 2014 Jul;119(1):49-55. (PMID: 24836471)
المشرفين على المادة: 0 (Hypnotics and Sedatives)
142M471B3J (Carbon Dioxide)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20170630 Date Completed: 20171002 Latest Revision: 20240326
رمز التحديث: 20240326
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC5491149
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180187
PMID: 28662195
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0180187