دورية أكاديمية
Comparison between Primary and Secondary Tracheoesophageal Puncture Prosthesis: A Systematic Review.
| العنوان: | Comparison between Primary and Secondary Tracheoesophageal Puncture Prosthesis: A Systematic Review. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Barauna Neto JC; Palmas Oncologic Center, Palmas, Brazil., Dedivitis RA, Aires FT, Pfann RZ, Matos LL, Cernea CR |
| المصدر: | ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties [ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec] 2017; Vol. 79 (4), pp. 222-229. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jul 29. |
| نوع المنشور: | Comparative Study; Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Review; Systematic Review |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Karger Country of Publication: Switzerland NLM ID: 0334721 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1423-0275 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 03011569 NLM ISO Abbreviation: ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: Basel, New York, Karger. |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Larynx, Artificial*, Laryngectomy/*rehabilitation, Esophagus/surgery ; Humans ; Laryngeal Neoplasms/surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; Prosthesis Failure ; Prosthesis Implantation ; Punctures ; Trachea/surgery ; Tracheal Stenosis/etiology ; Tracheostomy/adverse effects |
| مستخلص: | Introduction: Since the introduction of tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) and placement of voice prosthesis, this has become the method of choice to achieve speech rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Objective: To compare the complications and success in speech rehabilitation of patients undergoing rehabilitation after primary and secondary TEP (TEP1 and TEP2) through a systematic review. Methods: The literature survey included research in MedLine, Scielo, Lilacs, Cochrane and Websco until June 2016. Results: The rate of leakage around the prosthesis was higher in TEP1 (22.5 vs. 6.9%, p = 0.03). There were higher rates of wound infection (9.1 vs. 3.9%) and tracheal stenosis (8.5 vs. 4.5%) in the TEP1 group compared to TEP2, however with no statistical significance. The evaluation of speech quality was not possible due to the heterogeneity of the studies. Conclusion: There is a reduction in the risk of leakage around the prosthesis among TEP2 patients. (© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Carcinoma; Complications; Laryngeal prosthesis; Laryngectomy; Meta-analysis; Rehabilitation; Squamous cell; Systematic review |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20170803 Date Completed: 20180503 Latest Revision: 20181202 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20221213 |
| DOI: | 10.1159/000477970 |
| PMID: | 28768272 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1423-0275 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1159/000477970 |